PreprintCited by 3,317Natural Language Processing TechniquesTopic ModelingSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation

Open access
Cho, Kyunghyun, van Merrienboer, Bart, Gulcehre, Caglar, Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Bougares, Fethi, Schwenk, Holger, Bengio, Yoshua·2014·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model. Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recurrent neural networks, including long short-term memory and gated recurrent networks, are state-of-the-art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation.

    “Recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory [13] and gated recurrent [7] neural networks in particular, have been firmly established as state of the art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation [35, 2, 5].”

    From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [5]

  • It is not always optimal to use very large sequences in recurrent networks due to memory and training instability concerns.

    “Due to memory and training instability concerns [44] its not always optimal to use very large sequences in recurrent networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Le Mans Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Bahdanau, Dzmitry
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950635152
Cited by
3,317
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 335 · 2025: 348 · 2024: 369 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 434 · 2020: 495 · 2019: 436 · 2018: 296 · 2017: 172 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Compute Canada
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
statistical machine translation, phrase representation, recurrent neural networks, encoder-decoder architecture, log-linear models, joint training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review