Predictive coding feedback results in perceived illusory contours in a recurrent neural network
Open accessAbstract
Modern feedforward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can now solve some computer vision tasks at super-human levels. However, these networks only roughly mimic human visual perception. One difference from human vision is that they do not appear to perceive illusory contours (e.g. Kanizsa squares) in the same way humans do. Physiological evidence from visual cortex suggests that the perception of illusory contours could involve feedback connections. Would recurrent feedback neural networks perceive illusory contours like humans? In this work we equip a deep feedforward convolutional network with brain-inspired recurrent dynamics. The network was first pretrained with an unsupervised reconstruction objective on a natural image dataset, to expose it to natural object contour statistics. Then, a classification decision head was added and the model was finetuned on a form discrimination task: squares vs. randomly oriented inducer shapes (no illusory contour). Finally, the model was tested with the unfamiliar "illusory contour" configuration: inducer shapes oriented to form an illusory square. Compared with feedforward baselines, the iterative "predictive coding" feedback resulted in more illusory contours being classified as physical squares. The perception of the illusory contour was measurable in the luminance profile of the image reconstructions produced by the model, demonstrating that the model really "sees" the illusion. Ablation studies revealed that natural image pretra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pang et al. (2021) found that a predictive coding network, but not the initial feedforward model, was sensitive to the Kanizsa illusion.
“Pang et al. (2021) used a technique for adding feedback predictive coding connections to a feedforward DCNN and found further evidence that this predictive coding network, but not the initial feedforward model, was sensitive to the Kanizsa illusion.”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Pang et al. 2021
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To guide the implementation of the feedback connections, we follow the principles of "predictive coding" as introduced by Rao and Ballard [9], a popular framework in neuroscience for characterizing cortical function: in the hierarchical network, the higher layers try to predict the ∗correspondence: rufin.vanrullen@cnr…”
MethodInfluentialDeep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation
Khaligh-Razavi, S.-M., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003915 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: II The role of cortico-cortical loops
Mumford, D. (1992) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00198477 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop
Mumford, D. (1991) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202389 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Cichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27755 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Kanizsa, G. (1976) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0476-48 · Cited by 503 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Figure 1 shows an example of Kanizsa illusory contour (or subjective contour) [1, 2].”
BackgroundWhat visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia
Notredame, C.-E., Pins, D., Deneve, S., & Jardri, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00063 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Predictive Coding Approximates Backprop Along Arbitrary Computation Graphs
Millidge, B., Tschantz, A., & Buckley, C. L. (2022) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01497 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Perception science in the age of deep neural networks.
VanRullen, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00142 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S. M., Frith, C., Ji, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08708 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationBrucklacher, M., Bohté, S. M., Mejias, J. F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2023.1207361 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Context-sensitive conscious interpretation and layer-5 pyramidal neurons in multistable perception
Bachmann, T. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70393 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pang, Z., O’May, C. B., Choksi, B., & VanRullen, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- VanRullen, Rufin
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 164-175
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3162322270
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 279 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Neural Networks (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE37-0007, ANR-19-P3IA-0004, ANR-19-NEUC-0004, ANR‐19, PI3A-0004, 19-PI3A-0004, ANR18, ANR-19-PI3A-0004)
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- illusory contours, predictive coding, recurrent neural networks, feedback connections, Kanizsa square, visual perception, unsupervised pre-training, natural image statistics, form discrimination, brain-inspired models, VGG
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Form Perception, Humans, Illusions, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review