Cited by 13Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAction Observation and Synchronization

Brain networks of social action-outcome contingency: the role of the ventral striatum in integrating signals from the sensory cortex and medial prefrontal cortex

Open access
Sumiya, Motofumi, Koike, Takahiko, Okazaki, Shuntaro, Kitada, Ryo, Sadato, Norihiro·2017·Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Social interactions can be facilitated by action-outcome contingency, in which self-actions result in relevant responses from others. Research has indicated that the striatal reward system plays a role in generating action-outcome contingency signals. However, the neural mechanisms wherein signals regarding self-action and others' responses are integrated to generate the contingency signal remain poorly understood. We conducted a functional MRI study to test the hypothesis that brain activity representing the self modulates connectivity between the striatal reward system and sensory regions involved in the processing of others' responses. We employed a contingency task in which participants made the listener laugh by telling jokes. Participants reported more pleasure when greater laughter followed their own jokes than those of another. Self-relevant listener's responses produced stronger activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Laughter was associated with activity in the auditory cortex. The ventral striatum exhibited stronger activation when participants made listeners laugh than when another did. In physio-physiological interaction analyses, the ventral striatum showed interaction effects for signals extracted from the mPFC and auditory cortex. These results support the hypothesis that the mPFC, which is implicated in self-related processing, gates sensory input associated with others' responses during value processing in the ventral striatum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neures.2017.04.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional MRI studies show that experiencing partial components of positive social interactions-such as real-time eye gaze sharing, hearing laughter after a joke, or observing videos from someone with a shared intention-activates neural reward systems in ways similar to non-social rewards like monetary rewards.

    “Functional MRI studies have shown that experiencing partial components of positive social interactions such as real time sharing of eye gaze,67 hearing someone laugh after a telling a joke,68 and observing videos from someone who has a shared intention,69 activates neural reward systems in similar ways as do non-social rewards (eg, monetary rewards).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 13

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jones, E.E., Gerard, H., 1967. Dyadic interaction: a conceptual framework. In: Foun- dations of Social Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 505-536.
  2. Lancaster, J.L., Woldorff, M.G., Parsons, L.M., Liotti, M., Freitas, C.S., Rainey, L., Kochunov, P.V., Nickerson, D., Mikiten, S.A., Fox, P.T., 2000. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum. Brain Mapp. 10 (3), 120-131.

Authors
Sumiya, M., Koike, T., Okazaki, S., Kitada, R., & Sadato, N.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Kitada, Ryo
  • Sadato, Norihiro
Venue
Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
123
Pages
43-54
ISSN
0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610465246
Cited by
13
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • KAKENHI (15H05875, 15K12775, 23119727, 15H01846)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  • Nanyang Technological University to RK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
action-outcome contingency, ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, auditory cortex, social interaction, self-relevance, reward processing, listener responses, laughter, functional connectivity
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Reward, Social Behavior, Somatosensory Cortex, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review