Neural activity related to productive vocabulary knowledge effects during second language comprehension
Open accessAbstract
Second language learners and educators often believe that improving one's listening ability hinges on acquiring an extensive vocabulary and engaging in thorough listening practice. Our previous study suggested that listening comprehension is also impacted by the ability to produce vocabulary. Nevertheless, it remained uncertain whether quick comprehension could be attributed to a simple acceleration of processing or to changes in neural activity. To identify neural activity changes during sentence listening comprehension according to different levels of lexical knowledge (productive, only comprehensive, uncomprehensive), we measured participants' electrical activity in the brain via electroencephalography (EEG) and conducted a time-frequency-based EEG power analysis. Additionally, we employed a decoding model to verify the predictability of vocabulary knowledge levels based on neural activity. The decoding results showed that EEG activity could discriminate between listening to sentences containing phrases that include productive knowledge and ones without. The positive impact of productive vocabulary knowledge on sentence comprehension, driven by distinctive neural processing during sentence comprehension, was unequivocally evident. Our study emphasizes the importance of productive vocabulary knowledge acquisition to enhance the process of second language listening comprehension.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our findings contrast with earlier research which found that technology-based vocabulary instruction primarily benefited receptive knowledge rather than production.
“Interestingly, our findings contrast with earlier research (e.g., Allal-Sumoto et al., 2024;Bueno-Alastuey & Nemeth, 2020), which found that technology-based vocabulary instruction primarily benefited receptive knowledge rather than production.”
From Integrating ChatGPT for vocabulary learning and retention: A classroom-based study of Saudi EFL learners (2025) · cites this paper as Allal-Sumoto et al., 2024
Cites
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Listeners need to predict upcoming words on a constant basis in the first language (Clark, 2013).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdelhalim, S. M., & Alsehibany, R. (2025) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73635 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Interestingly, our findings contrast with earlier research (e.g., Allal-Sumoto et al., 2024; Bueno-Alastuey & Nemeth, 2020), which found that technology-based vocabulary instruction primarily benefited receptive knowledge rather than production.”
- Authors
- Allal-Sumoto, T. K., Şahin, D., & Mizuhara, H.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Mizuhara, Hiroaki
- ORCID
- Mizuhara, Hiroaki
- Venue
- Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 203
- Pages
- 8-17
- ISSN
- 0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391056034
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K12610, 22H03913, 23H01648)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- second language listening comprehension, productive vocabulary knowledge, vocabulary knowledge, neuronal activity, EEG decoding, sentence comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, time-frequency analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Speech Perception, Vocabulary, Multilingualism, Comprehension, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review