Cited by 62Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Ceftriaxone mediated rescue of nigral oxidative damage and motor deficits in MPTP model of Parkinson's disease in rats

Bisht, Rohit, Kaur, Baninder, Gupta, Hitu, Prakash, Atish·2014·NeuroToxicology

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta along with decreased striatal dopamine levels, and consequent extra pyramidal motor dysfunctions occur. It has been reported that Ceftriaxone, a β-lactam antibiotic recently had shown to have neuroprotective effects in various neurodegenerative disorder. Therefore the present study was designed to investigate the effects of Ceftriaxone (CFX) in a MPTP model of Parkinson in rats. MPTP was administered intranigrally for the induction of PD in Male Wistar rats. Ceftriaxone (100 and 200mg/kg) and Ropinirole (1.5 and 3mg/kg) were given intraperitonially, after induction of Parkinson's disease for 14 days. Different behavioral performance was carried on 1st, 14th, 21st, 28th consecutive days and biochemical parameters were estimated on 28th day. Central administration of MPTP showed significant impairment of motor behavior and marked increase of oxidative damage and neuro-inflammmation in rats. However, post treatment with Ceftriaxone (100 and 200mg/kg) significantly improved the motor deficits and attenuated the oxidative damage indicating decreased rise of LPO and nitrite concentration and restored the decreased activities of endogenous antioxidant enzyme (Glutathione, Catalase, SOD). In addition Ceftriaxone also attenuates the pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-β in striatum region of MPTP induced PD in rats. Ropinirole (1.5mg/kg) pret…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.05.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 62

Authors
Bisht, R., Kaur, B., Gupta, H., & Prakash, A.
Affiliations
Indo Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy (IN)
Corresponding author
Prakash, Atish
Venue
NeuroToxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
44
Pages
71-79
ISSN
0161-813X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012925996
Cited by
62
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroToxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
ISF College of Pharmacy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
ceftriaxone, Parkinson's disease, MPTP, substantia nigra, neuroprotection, oxidative stress, motor impairment, neuroinflammation, antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation, inflammatory cytokines, ropinirole, dopaminergic pathways, glutamatergic pathways
MeSH terms
Animals, Ceftriaxone, Encephalitis, Indoles, Male, Motor Activity, Substantia Nigra, Rats, Wistar, Oxidative Stress, Neuroprotective Agents, MPTP Poisoning, Rotarod Performance Test, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review