Cited by 256Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Tau truncation during neurofibrillary tangle evolution in Alzheimer’s disease

Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L., Garcia-Sierra, Francisco, Reynolds, Matthew R., Horowitz, Peleg M., Fu, Yifan, Wang, Tianyi, Cahill, Michael E., Bigio, Eileen H. +2 more·2005·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

The microtubule-associated protein, tau, is a highly soluble molecule that is nonetheless capable of self-association into filamentous deposits characteristic of a number of neurodegenerative diseases. This state change is thought to be driven by phosphorylation and/or C-terminal truncation events resulting in intracellular inclusions, such as the neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previously, we reported the existence of a novel truncation event, cleavage at aspartic acid(421), presumably by a caspase, and also described a monoclonal antibody (Tau-C3) specific for tau cleaved at this site. Here, we report the timing of this cleavage event relative to other antibody-targeted alterations in the tau molecule during the course of NFT evolution in AD. Immunohistochemical studies indicate that cleavage at aspartic acid(421) occurs after formation of the Alz50 epitope but prior to formation of the Tau-66 epitope and truncation at glutamic acid(391) (formation of the MN423 epitope). Thus, creation of the Tau-C3 epitope appears to occur relatively early in the disease state, contemporaneous with the initial Alz50 folding event that heralds the appearance of filamentous tau in NFTs, neuropil threads, and the dystrophic neurites surrounding amyloid plaques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 256

Authors
Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Garcia-Sierra, F., Reynolds, M. R., Horowitz, P. M., Fu, Y., Wang, T., Cahill, M. E., Bigio, E. H., Berry, R. W., & Binder, L. I.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1015-1022
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112874709
Cited by
256
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG13854, AG021661, R01AG021661, AG09466, AG-020506, P01AG009466, P30AG013854, T32AG020506)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, tau truncation, caspase cleavage, tau phosphorylation, neuropil threads, dystrophic neurites, amyloid plaques
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Antigens, Aspartic Acid, Brain, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Postmortem Changes, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Blotting, Western, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Gene Deletion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review