Tau truncation during neurofibrillary tangle evolution in Alzheimer’s disease
Abstract
The microtubule-associated protein, tau, is a highly soluble molecule that is nonetheless capable of self-association into filamentous deposits characteristic of a number of neurodegenerative diseases. This state change is thought to be driven by phosphorylation and/or C-terminal truncation events resulting in intracellular inclusions, such as the neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previously, we reported the existence of a novel truncation event, cleavage at aspartic acid(421), presumably by a caspase, and also described a monoclonal antibody (Tau-C3) specific for tau cleaved at this site. Here, we report the timing of this cleavage event relative to other antibody-targeted alterations in the tau molecule during the course of NFT evolution in AD. Immunohistochemical studies indicate that cleavage at aspartic acid(421) occurs after formation of the Alz50 epitope but prior to formation of the Tau-66 epitope and truncation at glutamic acid(391) (formation of the MN423 epitope). Thus, creation of the Tau-C3 epitope appears to occur relatively early in the disease state, contemporaneous with the initial Alz50 folding event that heralds the appearance of filamentous tau in NFTs, neuropil threads, and the dystrophic neurites surrounding amyloid plaques.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tau truncation is particularly involved in the onset/progression of Alzheimer's disease due to its capacity to induce both misfolding/aggregation and neurodegeneration.
“Truncation, among tau post-translational modifications, is particularly involved in the onset/progression of AD due to its capacity to induce both misfolding/aggregation and neurodegeneration [54].”
From Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Medicinal Plants for Alzheimer’s Disease: Preclinical to Clinical Trial Insights (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 256
- Authors
- Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Garcia-Sierra, F., Reynolds, M. R., Horowitz, P. M., Fu, Y., Wang, T., Cahill, M. E., Bigio, E. H., Berry, R. W., & Binder, L. I.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1015-1022
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112874709
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (AG13854, AG021661, R01AG021661, AG09466, AG-020506, P01AG009466, P30AG013854, T32AG020506)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, tau truncation, caspase cleavage, tau phosphorylation, neuropil threads, dystrophic neurites, amyloid plaques
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Antigens, Aspartic Acid, Brain, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Postmortem Changes, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Blotting, Western, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Gene Deletion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review