Cited by 69Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling

Changes in phagocytosis and potassium channel activity in microglia of 5xFAD mice indicate alterations in purinergic signaling in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

Wendt, Stefan, Maricos, Meron, Vana, Natascha, Meyer, Niklas, Guneykaya, Dilansu, Semtner, Marcus, Kettenmann, Helmut·2017·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

As the immunocompetent cells of the central nervous system, microglia accumulate at amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and acquire a morphological phenotype of activated microglia. Recent functional studies, however, indicate that in mouse models of amyloidosis and AD, these cells are rather dysfunctional indicated by a reduced phagocytic activity. Here, we report that this reduction in phagocytic activity is associated with perturbed purinergic receptor signaling, since phagocytosis could be stimulated by P2Y 6 receptor activation in control, but not in 5xFAD transgenic animals, an animal model of amyloid deposition. Impaired phagocytosis is not innate, and develops only at later stages of amyloidosis. Furthermore, we show that membrane currents induced by uridine diphosphate, a ligand activating P2Y 6 receptors, are altered in response rate and amplitude in microglia in close vicinity to plaques, but not in plaque-free areas of 5xFAD animals. These changes were accompanied by changes in membrane properties and potassium channel activity of plaque-associated microglia in early and late stages of amyloidosis. As a conclusion, the physiological properties of plaque-associated microglia are altered with a strong impact on purinergic signaling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.027

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wendt, S., Maricos, M., Vana, N., Meyer, N., Guneykaya, D., Semtner, M., & Kettenmann, H.
Affiliations
Max Delbrück Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Kettenmann, Helmut
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
58
Pages
41-53
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2621707445
Cited by
69
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 257 NeuroCure, SFB TRR43)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Keywords
microglia, phagocytosis, purinergic signaling, P2Y6 receptor, potassium channels, 5xFAD mice, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, amyloidosis, uridine diphosphate, membrane currents, microglial dysfunction
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Phagocytosis, Receptors, Purinergic, Potassium Channels, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review