Cited by 276Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

CX3CR1 in Microglia Regulates Brain Amyloid Deposition through Selective Protofibrillar Amyloid-β Phagocytosis

Open access
Liu, Zhiqiang, Condello, Carlo, Schain, Aaron, Harb, Roa, Grutzendler, Jaime·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyloid-β (Aβ) deposits are frequently surrounded by activated microglia but the precise role of these cells in disease progression remains unclear. The chemokine receptor CX3CR1 is selectively expressed in microglia and is thought to modulate their activity. To study the specific effects of microglia activation on amyloid pathology in vivo, we crossbred mice lacking CX3CR1 with the Alzheimer's mouse model CRND8. Surprisingly, we found that CX3CR1-deficient mice had lower brain levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 and reduced amyloid deposits. Quantification of Aβ within microglia and time-lapse two-photon microscopy in live mice revealed that these cells were highly effective at the uptake of protofibrillar amyloid but were incapable of phagocytosis of fibrillar congophilic Aβ. CX3CR1 deletion was associated with increased phagocytic ability, which led to greater amyloid content within microglial phagolysosomes. Furthermore, CX3CR1-deficient mice had an increased number of microglia around individual plaques because of higher proliferative rates, which likely contributed to an overall greater phagocytic capacity. CX3CR1 deletion did not affect the degree of neuronal or synaptic damage around plaques despite increased microglia density. Our results demonstrate that microglia can regulate brain Aβ levels and plaque deposition via selective protofibrillar Aβ phagocytosis. Modulation of microglia activity and proliferation by CX3CR1 signaling may represent a therapeutic strategy for AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4403-10.2010

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

12 of 24 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Microglia may only be able to remove fibrillar amyloid from plaques during heightened levels of activation such as in injury models or after Aβ immunization.

    “Thus microglia may only be able to remove fibrillar amyloid from plaques during heightened levels of activation such as in injury models (DiCarlo et al., 2001) or after Aβ immunization (Bacskai et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites DiCarlo et al., 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bacskai et al., 2002 source

      The introduction links microglial activation after topical antibody treatment to a possible Fc-mediated clearance mechanism, and the Results report clearance of some dense-core plaques after antibody treatment. But the paper does not establish that microglia themselves cleared those plaques or that heightened activation is required; it also finds evidence for non-Fc-mediated clearance. Its experiments used topical antibodies, not Aβ immunization. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    CX3CR1 modulation of phagocytosis may involve the indirect effect of proinflammatory cytokines which can attenuate phagocytosis.

    “Thus, CX3CR1 modulation of phagocytosis may involve the indirect effect of some proinflammatory cytokines which can attenuate phagocytosis (Koenigsknecht-Talboo and Landreth, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koenigsknecht-Talboo and Landreth, 2005 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Fractalkine through its receptor CX3CR1 acts as a repressor of microglia activation.

    “Our findings support the concept that fractalkine through its receptor CX3CR1 (Harrison et al., 1998) acts as a repressor of microglia activation (Cardona et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harrison et al., 1998 source
    • cites Cardona et al., 2006 source
    • Rests on an assumption: CX3CR1 is specifically expressed in microglia in the brain.
  • Findingown data

    There was complete stability of the Aβ42 (HiLyte)-555 label in plaques at least over a 90 day interval.

    “However, we found complete stability of the label at least over this 90 day interval (Figure 3B, C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Fluorescently labeled Aβ42 (HiLyte-555) behaves like endogenous Aβ42 in binding, stability, and phagocytosis.
  • Findingown data

    Once bound to plaques, Aβ42 was highly stable over many weeks.

    “Once bound to plaques, we found by time-lapse imaging that Aβ42 was highly stable over many weeks like we observed with methoxy-XO4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Fluorescently labeled Aβ42 (HiLyte-555) behaves like endogenous Aβ42 in binding, stability, and phagocytosis.
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CX3CR1 is selectively expressed in microglia and modulates microglial activity in response to fractalkine.

    “The chemokine receptor CX3CR1 is selectively expressed in microglia and is thought to modulate their activity.”
    • Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
      “In the brain, this receptor is exclusively expressed in microglia and selectively modulates microglial activity in response to its ligand the chemokine fractalkine (Harrison et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison et al., 1998 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Microglia have been shown to be capable of phagocytosis of amyloid fibrils.

    “Microglia have been shown to be capable of phagocytosis of amyloid fibrils (2)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      The Results and Discussion passages address neutrophil chemokine receptors and migration during sepsis, not microglia or amyloid fibrils. Searches for microglial phagocytosis and amyloid-fibril uptake found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Conflicting evidence suggests either neurotoxic or neuroprotective effects of CX3CR1 deletion in various disease models.

    “Conflicting evidence in the literature suggests either neurotoxic or neuroprotective effects of CX3CR1 deletion in various disease models (Cardona et al., 2006; Fuhrmann et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cardona et al., 2006 source
    • cites Fuhrmann et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous in vivo results range from showing that microglia are effective at phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid to suggesting that microglia play no role in the control of amyloid deposition.

    “Previous in vivo results range from showing that microglia are effective at phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid (Frautschy et al., 1991; Bacskai et al., 2002; Bolmont et al., 2008) to suggesting that microglia play no role in the control of amyloid deposition (Grathwohl et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Frautschy et al., 1991 source

      The indexed Abstract describes neuronal responses to amyloid cores injected into rat brain, but does not report microglial phagocytosis. Searches for microglia and phagocytosis returned only the abstract and references; the available indexed text does not establish the finding attributed to Frautschy et al. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Bacskai et al., 2002 source

      The Results report in vivo clearance of dense-core amyloid plaques after antibody treatment, and the Discussion treats microglial phagocytosis as a possible clearance mechanism. But the paper attributes direct evidence of microglial phagocytosis to ex vivo work; its own in vivo experiments also found effective Fc-independent clearance. It therefore does not show that microglia phagocytosed fibrillar amyloid in vivo. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Grathwohl et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Microglia exhibit an increasing capacity for Aβ phagocytosis as Aβ adopts protofibrillar conformations but fail to phagocytose fibrillar deposits in vivo.

    “Thus, the long-term persistence of methoxy-XO4 and Aβ42 (HiLyte)-555 plaque labeling coupled with the absence of TS label inside microglia strongly suggests that little phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid takes place in vivo.”
    • Also stated in: § Microglia are effective at phagocytosis of protofibrillar amyloid in vivo · hedged
      “Together, these data indicate that microglia exhibit an increasing capacity for Aβ phagocytosis as it gradually adopts protofibrillar conformations but fail to phagocytose fibrillar deposits that have adopted a β-pleated sheet conformation.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “However, in contrast to recent imaging studies (Bolmont et al., 2008) we found that microglia, while highly effective at phagocytosis of oligomeric and protofibrillar Aβ, were incapable of removing fibrillar amyloid from preexisting plaques in vivo.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bolmont et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that microglia may phagocytose protofibrils at plaque edges, but does not report increasing phagocytic capacity as Aβ changes conformation. It also says further study is needed to determine whether the material taken up is soluble or fibrillar Aβ, so it does not establish that microglia fail to phagocytose fibrillar deposits in vivo. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    It remains unclear to what extent microglia are capable of removing amyloid from pre-existing fibrillar congophilic plaques or of preventing the deposition of smaller protofibrillar Aβ aggregates.

    “it remains unclear to what extent microglia are capable of removing amyloid from pre-existing fibrillar congophilic plaques (Stalder et al., 2001) or of preventing the deposition of smaller protofibrillar Aβ aggregates (Grathwohl et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stalder et al., 2001 source
    • cites Grathwohl et al., 2009 source

      The citation to Grathwohl et al. attaches to the claim about preventing deposition of smaller protofibrillar Aβ aggregates, not to the preceding claim about removing pre-existing plaques. In the Introduction (page unavailable), the paper reports that microglial ablation did not prevent plaque formation or change the extent of Aβ deposition in APP mouse models. It does not specifically assess smaller protofibrillar aggregates, so it supports the broader uncertainty about microglia and deposition but not that specific form. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A11 and 4G8 antibodies detect oligomeric and other protofibrillar conformations respectively.

    “We obtained high resolution confocal images of brain slices from CRND8 mice stained with A11 and 4G8 antibodies, which detect oligomeric and other protofibrillar conformations respectively (Lesné et al., 2006; Kayed et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lesné et al., 2006 source
    • cites Kayed et al., 2007 source

      The Background and Results (pages not provided) support A11 as a detector of prefibrillar oligomers. But the Results report that 4G8 reacts with both fibrillar and prefibrillar samples, including monomer-sized material; they do not support describing it as a detector of a distinct protofibrillar conformation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was no significant difference between CX3CR1 genotypes in APP concentrations, mRNA expression of APP processing enzymes (BACE1 and 2; PS1 and 2), or levels of APP cleavage products.

    “there was no significant difference in amyloid precursor protein (APP) concentrations (Figure 1E), mRNA expression of APP processing enzymes (BACE1 and 2; PS1 and 2) (Figure 1F) or levels of APP cleavage products (Figure 1G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CRND8 mouse model of amyloid deposition is relevant to human Alzheimer's disease.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Microglia cell bodies can remain stable over months, and no significant difference in stability between mice of different CX3CR1 genotypes was observed.

    “Microglia cell bodies however, can remain stable over months (Supplementary figure 4) but no significant difference in stability between mice of different CX3CR1 genotypes was observed (Figures 7E, F).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Deletion of CX3CR1 leads to a significant reduction in the total levels of brain Aβ and in the number of amyloid plaques in a mouse model of AD.

    “We show that deletion of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which in the brain is specifically expressed in microglia, leads to a significant reduction in the total levels of brain Aβ and in the number of amyloid plaques in a mouse model of AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Non-plaque areas show substantially lower overall proliferation rates and no significant differences between CX3CR1 genotypes.

    “Interestingly, we found that the overall proportion of microglia that were BrdU-labeled was significantly greater in CRND8/CX3CR1−/− mice than in CRND8/CX3CR1+/+ littermates (Figure 7C, D), while non-plaque areas showed substantially lower overall proliferation rates and no significant differences between genotypes (Figure 7D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pre-incubation with anti-CX3CR1 neutralizing antibody increases microsphere phagocytosis in CX3CR1+/+ microglia but not in CX3CR1−/− microglia.

    “Pre incubation with anti-CX3CR1 neutralizing antibody 2 hours prior to the phagocytosis assay led to increased microsphere phagocytosis in CX3CR1+/+ microglia but not those lacking CX3CR1 (Figure 6E) demonstrating rapid and specific modulation of phagocytosis by the reduction of CX3CR1 activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Results were validated by manual counting in a subset of stacks.

    “Results were validated by manual counting in a subset of stacks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Microglia density around plaques was quantified in blindly selected plaques of the same average size to eliminate size as a variable.

    “Microglia density around plaques was quantified in blindly selected plaques of the same average size to eliminate size as a variable which can lead to differences in microglia number unrelated to the CX3CR1 genotype..”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    It is not clear how or to what extent microglia control brain amyloid levels or deposition.

    “Thus, it is not clear how or to what extent microglia control brain amyloid levels or deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CX3CR1 deletion was associated with increased phagocytic ability which led to greater amyloid content within microglial phagolysosomes.

    “CX3CR1 deletion was associated with increased phagocytic ability which led to greater amyloid content within microglial phagolysosomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Microglia play an important role in selective phagocytosis of oligomeric and protofibrillar Aβ but not of preexisting congophilic amyloid plaques.

    “Thus, our data demonstrate that microglia play an important role in selective phagocytosis of oligomeric and protofibrillar Aβ but not of preexisting congophilic amyloid plaques.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The absence of intracellular Thioflavin-S labeling indicates lack of phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid rather than rapid degradation or masking of the label.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All images were obtained with standardized parameters of laser intensity, gain and pinhole size.

    “All images were obtained with standardized parameters of laser intensity, gain and pinhole size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CX3CR1 deletion increased microglia proliferation and numbers specifically around plaques, which coupled with increased phagocytic ability, resulted in decreased brain amyloid levels and deposition.

    “CX3CR1 deletion increased microglia proliferation and numbers specifically around plaques, which coupled with their increased phagocytic ability, resulted in decreased brain amyloid levels and deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    IBA1 labels all brain microglia but cannot differentiate them from infiltrating macrophages.

    “Thus IBA1 labels all brain microglia but cannot differentiate them from infiltrating macrophages given that macrophages also label with IBA1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All other experiments including quantification of Aβ within microglia and in vivo imaging were done in mixed gender mice but with equal gender distribution on each experimental group.

    “All other experiments including quantification of Aβ within microglia and in vivo imaging experiments were done in mixed gender mice but with equal gender distribution on each experimental group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A subset of images was counted manually by an unbiased individual to corroborate the accuracy of automated counting.

    “A subset of images was counted manually by an unbiased individual to corroborate the accuracy of our automated counting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Confocal images of plaques selected for similar size, location and cortical layer were obtained with standardized laser intensity, gain and pinhole sizes to allow inter-animal comparisons.

    “Confocal images of plaques selected for their similar size, location and cortical layer were obtained for quantitative imaging using an Olympus FV10i Confocal Microscope (60X objective N.A. 1.2). Image z-stacks were taken with standardized laser intensity, gain and pinhole sizes to allow inter-animal comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased fractalkine signaling in aging could in theory restrain microglia and predispose individuals to amyloid deposition and toxicity.

    “Increased fractalkine signaling in aging could in theory restrain microglia and predispose individuals to amyloid deposition and toxicity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Technical limitations of in vivo imaging make it unfeasible to quantify microglia cell body dynamics over longer intervals with sufficient precision.

    “However, technical limitations of in vivo imaging make it unfeasible to quantify microglia cell body dynamics over longer intervals with sufficient precision.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ablation of microglia is likely to induce marked astrocyte activation and could turn astrocytes into more effective phagocytes that compensate for the loss of microglia, explaining the apparent lack of effect of microglia ablation on Aβ levels.

    “Ablation is likely to induce marked astrocyte activation and could turn these cells into much more effective phagocytes which could compensate for the loss of microglia and thus explain the apparent lack of effect of microglia ablation on Aβ levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Ongoing microglial phagocytosis around growing fibrillar deposits could reduce levels of oligomeric and protofibrillar Aβ, which may change the equilibrium between monomers, oligomers and fibrils, altering nucleation-dependent polymerization that leads to fibrillar plaque formation.

    “Ongoing microglial phagocytosis around growing fibrillar deposits could reduce levels of oligomeric and protofibrillar Aβ, which may change the equilibrium between monomers, oligomers and fibrils, altering the process of nucleation-dependent polymerization that leads to fibrillar plaque formation (Harper and Lansbury Jr., 1997; Walsh et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harper and Lansbury Jr., 1997 source
    • cites Walsh et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Microglia activation is not an all-or-none process and its net effect may depend on the particular pathological scenario.

    “Thus it appears that microglia activation is not an all or none process and its net effect may depend on the particular pathological scenario (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Subtle variations in microglia recruitment/retention could contribute to the observed disparities in microglia number around plaques.

    “Thus we cannot rule out that subtle variations in microglia recruitment/retention could contribute to the observed disparities in microglia number around plaques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CX3CR1 deficiency has neither neuroprotective nor neurotoxic effects around individual plaques at least in this model of Alzheimer's-like pathology.

    “Thus it appears that CX3CR1 deficiency has neither neuroprotective nor neurotoxic effects around individual plaques at least in this model of Alzheimer’s-like pathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The main role played by microglia is likely to ameliorate the formation of new fibrillar plaques rather than to remove preexisting ones, with the most critical effect likely being at the earliest stages of plaque deposition.

    “Thus, it is likely that the main role played by microglia is to ameliorate the formation of new fibrillar plaques rather than to remove preexisting ones, with the most critical effect likely being at the earliest stages of plaque deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We cannot rule out that some of the effects we observed are at least partly due to peripheral macrophages entering the brain.

    “Thus we cannot rule out that some of the effects we observed are at least partly due to peripheral macrophages entering the brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The effect of CX3CR1 deletion on brain amyloid is mediated by a general enhancement of microglia phagocytic ability as demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo.

    “The effect of CX3CR1 deletion on brain amyloid was mediated by a general enhancement of microglia phagocytic ability as demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The disparity in Aβ uptake between CX3CR1 genotypes is mostly due to differential phagocytic capacity rather than macropinocytosis.
    • Rests on an assumption: CX3CR1 is specifically expressed in microglia in the brain.
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CRND8 mouse model of amyloid deposition is relevant to human Alzheimer's disease.

    “we crossbred mice lacking CX3CR1 with the Alzheimer’s mouse model CRND8”
    “CX3CR1−/− mice were crossbred with transgenic mice (CRND8) harboring the human amyloid precursor protein gene with the Indiana and Swedish mutations (Chishti et al., 2001).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluorescently labeled Aβ42 (HiLyte-555) behaves like endogenous Aβ42 in binding, stability, and phagocytosis.

    “we developed a method for subarachnoid infusion of fluorescently tagged Aβ peptides”
    “Aβ42 (HiLyte)-555 was being infused”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In vivo two-photon imaging through a thinned skull does not alter microglial phagocytic behavior or plaque stability.

    “GFP-labeled microglia and Methoxy-X04 (MX04) labeled plaques were imaged through a thinned skull preparation as previously described (Grutzendler et al., 2002).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of intracellular Thioflavin-S labeling indicates lack of phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid rather than rapid degradation or masking of the label.

    “Quantification of TS fluorescence within IBA1-immunolabeled cells revealed absence of any intracellular TS labeling (Figure 2C, D) regardless of the CX3CR1 genotype (Figure 2D).”
    “we found complete stability of the label at least over this 90 day interval (Figure 3B, C).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The disparity in Aβ uptake between CX3CR1 genotypes is mostly due to differential phagocytic capacity rather than macropinocytosis.

    “However, given that CX3CR1 deletion is able to modulate phagocytosis of polystyrene microspheres, we assume that the disparity in Aβ uptake between genotypes is mostly due to differential phagocytic capacity rather than macropinocytosis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CX3CR1 is specifically expressed in microglia in the brain.

    “We show that deletion of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which in the brain is specifically expressed in microglia, leads to a significant reduction in the total levels of brain Aβ and in the number of amyloid plaques in a mouse model of AD.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported final synaptophysin band exceeds ten-band scheme

    Minor

    Ten consecutive 3-μm bands starting at 2-5 μm would end at 29-32 μm. The stated final band at 32-35 μm would be an eleventh band.

  • Different antibody pretreatment times

    Minor

    The methods specify a 30-minute pretreatment with CX3CR1-neutralizing antibody, but the results describe it as occurring 2 hours before the phagocytosis assay.

2 of 2

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1038/nature04533

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2024-06-24 (notice 10.1038/s41586-024-07691-8), not before this paper was published (2010-12-15).

    Cited work 10.1038/nature04533 · retracted 2024-06-24 · notice 10.1038/s41586-024-07691-8 · this paper published 2010-12-15

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., Condello, C., Schain, A., Harb, R., & Grutzendler, J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
30
Issue
50
Pages
17091-17101
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2086776463
Cited by
276
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
CX3CR1, microglia, amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, phagocytosis, amyloid plaques, microglial activation, microglial proliferation
MeSH terms
CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1, Animals, Brain, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review