Identifying incipient dementia individuals using machine learning and amyloid imaging
Open accessAbstract
Identifying individuals destined to develop Alzheimer's dementia within time frames acceptable for clinical trials constitutes an important challenge to design studies to test emerging disease-modifying therapies. Although amyloid-β protein is the core pathologic feature of Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers of neuronal degeneration are the only ones believed to provide satisfactory predictions of clinical progression within short time frames. Here, we propose a machine learning-based probabilistic method designed to assess the progression to dementia within 24 months, based on the regional information from a single amyloid positron emission tomography scan. Importantly, the proposed method was designed to overcome the inherent adverse imbalance proportions between stable and progressive mild cognitive impairment individuals within a short observation period. The novel algorithm obtained an accuracy of 84% and an under-receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91, outperforming the existing algorithms using the same biomarker measures and previous studies using multiple biomarker modalities. With its high accuracy, this algorithm has immediate applications for population enrichment in clinical trials designed to test disease-modifying therapies aiming to mitigate the progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI can detect indicators of Alzheimer's disease in a patient's brain scans before clinicians can.
“AI can detect indicators of Alzheimer’s disease in a patient’s brain scans before clinicians can, according to a recent study published in Neurobiology of Aging”
From Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health (2021) · cites this paper as Mathotaarachchi et al. 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Mathotaarachchi, S., Pascoal, T. A., Shin, M., Benedet, A. L., Kang, M. S., Beaudry, T., Fonov, V. S., Gauthier, S., & Rosa-Neto, P.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 80-90
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735045133
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#MOP-11-51-31)
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, dementia prediction, amyloid PET, amyloid-beta, mild cognitive impairment, disease progression, machine learning, probabilistic prediction model, class imbalance, disease-modifying therapy, biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review