The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of rTMS effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, has emerged as a promising treatment for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, however, the effectiveness of this therapy is unclear because of the low statistical power and heterogeneity of previous trials. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to systematically characterize the effectiveness of various combinations of rTMS parameters on different cognitive domains in patients with MCI and AD. Thirteen studies comprising 293 patients with MCI or AD were included in this analysis. Random-effects analysis revealed an overall medium-to-large effect size (0.77) favoring active rTMS over sham rTMS in the improvement of cognitive functions. Subgroup analyses revealed that (1) high-frequency rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and low-frequency rTMS at the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex significantly improved memory functions; (2) high-frequency rTMS targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus significantly enhanced executive performance; and (3) the effects of 5-30 consecutive rTMS sessions could last for 4-12 weeks. Potential mechanisms of rTMS effects on cognitive functions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Evidence supports the pro-cognitive effects of TMS in healthy individuals (Luber & Lisanby, 2014) and in patients with neurologic and psychiatric illnesses such as mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Cheng et al., 2018;Chou et al., 2020;Lin et al., 2019;Wang et al., 2020), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; Chou et al., 2020;Drumond Marra et al., 2015;Jiang et al., 2021), stroke (M.Liu et al., 2021”
From Neurocognitive effects of theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: A systematic review and recommendations for future research (2025) · cites this paper as Chou et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · Cited by 4,808
NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 · Cited by 4,466
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Rind, D., Devereaux, P. J., Montori, V. M., Freyschuss, B., Vist, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 · Cited by 2,693
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–315 of 315
Zhang, D., Yang, Y., Xu, G., Wang, L., Zhang, G., Song, W., Ye, M., Luo, J., & Li, D. (2026) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-026-02081-9
Lu, L., Lan, S., Lan, S., & Hsieh, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1782521
Zhou, Y., Xue, Q., Hou, S., Zhang, K., Pan, W., Zeng, T., Wang, Y.-G., Ma, D., Zhao, C., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.76611
Dai, W., Canhuan, L. I. U., CHENG, Y., Xu, G., Wang, X., Ding, H., Zhu, Q., Zhao, Z., Fang, L., Li, C., et al. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122159
Udoratina, A., Maksimenko, V., & Gordleeva, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1906284
Lin, Y., Chen, X., Li, D., Luo, J., He, L., Chen, Y., & Huang, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1826010
Merhy, R. M. B., Cavaleri, R., Alhassani, G., Oxenham, V., Metri, N., Hochstrasser, D., Hohenberg, M. I., Nagaratnam, K., Singh, K., & Steiner, G. Z. (2026) · Methods and Protocols · doi:10.3390/mps9050130
Neuromodulation: Current Knowledge and Future Priorities
Krystal, A. D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31497-0_5
Zhou, X., Hu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1883995
Ren, H., Jiao, J., Lan, X., Tan, C., Wang, Z., Pei, H., Yao, D., Liu, T., & Dong, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1894724
Hyun, M., Park, Y., Park, S. Y., & Kim, K. W. (2026) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-026-02564-6
Selective memory modulation following its reactivation in virtual reality
Zil-Bar, R., Schrift, G., Kozak, S., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Censor, N. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101365
Qiao, Y., Chen, H., Fan, K., Yang, X., Yu, Y., Wang, R., Xing, Y., & Tang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877261492561
Meng, J., Gao, Y., Li, H., Feng, L., Li, X., Zhou, Z., Hu, X., Li, H., He, Y., Guo, Y., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1931880
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, Y.-H., Ton That, V., & Sundman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chou, Ying-hui
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6995441
- OpenAlex
- W2970043376
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Arizona
- Shell United States (PI: Y-hC)
- National Institutes of Health (Y-hC)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive enhancement, high-frequency rTMS, low-frequency rTMS, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, memory, executive function, treatment duration
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review