Cited by 280Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Age- and sex-related effects on the neuroanatomy of healthy elderly

Lemaître, Hervé, Crivello, Fabrice, Grassiot, Blandine, Alpérovitch, Annick, Tzourio, Christophe, Mazoyer, Bernard·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

Effects of age and sex, and their interaction on the structural brain anatomy of healthy elderly were assessed thanks to a cross-sectional study of a cohort of 662 subjects aged from 63 to 75 years. T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans were acquired in each subject and further processed using a voxel-based approach that was optimized for the identification of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Analysis of covariance revealed a classical neuroanatomy sexual dimorphism, men exhibiting larger gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and CSF compartment volumes, together with larger WM and CSF fractions, whereas women showed larger GM fraction. GM and WM were found to significantly decrease with age, while CSF volume significantly increased. Tissue probability map analysis showed that the highest rates of GM atrophy in this age range were localized in primary cortices, the angular and superior parietal gyri, the orbital part of the prefrontal cortex, and in the hippocampal region. There was no significant interaction between "Sex" and "Age" for any of the tissue volumes, as well as for any of the tissue probability maps. These findings indicate that brain atrophy during the seventh and eighth decades of life is ubiquitous and proceeds at a rate that is not modulated by "Sex".

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using ROI or VBM have yielded contradictory results regarding whether the hippocampus is preserved or deteriorates with aging.

    “In spite of the objectivity of this method, studies led to somewhat contradictory results regarding the hippocampus: some authors have found this structure to be preserved with aging [29,31], whereas others have reported structural deterioration [38,81,84,87].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 280

Authors
Lemaître, H., Crivello, F., Grassiot, B., Alpérovitch, A., Tzourio, C., & Mazoyer, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Mazoyer, Bernard
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
900-911
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041959662
Cited by
280
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
brain aging, sex differences, gray matter atrophy, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, tissue probability maps, healthy older adults, hippocampus, primary cortex, prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Blood Vessels, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review