Age- and sex-related effects on the neuroanatomy of healthy elderly
Abstract
Effects of age and sex, and their interaction on the structural brain anatomy of healthy elderly were assessed thanks to a cross-sectional study of a cohort of 662 subjects aged from 63 to 75 years. T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans were acquired in each subject and further processed using a voxel-based approach that was optimized for the identification of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Analysis of covariance revealed a classical neuroanatomy sexual dimorphism, men exhibiting larger gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and CSF compartment volumes, together with larger WM and CSF fractions, whereas women showed larger GM fraction. GM and WM were found to significantly decrease with age, while CSF volume significantly increased. Tissue probability map analysis showed that the highest rates of GM atrophy in this age range were localized in primary cortices, the angular and superior parietal gyri, the orbital part of the prefrontal cortex, and in the hippocampal region. There was no significant interaction between "Sex" and "Age" for any of the tissue volumes, as well as for any of the tissue probability maps. These findings indicate that brain atrophy during the seventh and eighth decades of life is ubiquitous and proceeds at a rate that is not modulated by "Sex".
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies using ROI or VBM have yielded contradictory results regarding whether the hippocampus is preserved or deteriorates with aging.
“In spite of the objectivity of this method, studies led to somewhat contradictory results regarding the hippocampus: some authors have found this structure to be preserved with aging [29,31], whereas others have reported structural deterioration [38,81,84,87].”
From Voxel-based mapping of brain gray matter volume and glucose metabolism profiles in normal aging (2009) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 280
- Authors
- Lemaître, H., Crivello, F., Grassiot, B., Alpérovitch, A., Tzourio, C., & Mazoyer, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Mazoyer, Bernard
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 900-911
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041959662
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- brain aging, sex differences, gray matter atrophy, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, tissue probability maps, healthy older adults, hippocampus, primary cortex, prefrontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Blood Vessels, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review