The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG
Open accessAbstract
Neuronally plausible, generative or forward models are essential for understanding how event-related fields (ERFs) and potentials (ERPs) are generated. In this paper, we present a new approach to modeling event-related responses measured with EEG or MEG. This approach uses a biologically informed model to make inferences about the underlying neuronal networks generating responses. The approach can be regarded as a neurobiologically constrained source reconstruction scheme, in which the parameters of the reconstruction have an explicit neuronal interpretation. Specifically, these parameters encode, among other things, the coupling among sources and how that coupling depends upon stimulus attributes or experimental context. The basic idea is to supplement conventional electromagnetic forward models, of how sources are expressed in measurement space, with a model of how source activity is generated by neuronal dynamics. A single inversion of this extended forward model enables inference about both the spatial deployment of sources and the underlying neuronal architecture generating them. Critically, this inference covers long-range connections among well-defined neuronal subpopulations. In a previous paper, we simulated ERPs using a hierarchical neural-mass model that embodied bottom-up, top-down and lateral connections among remote regions. In this paper, we describe a Bayesian procedure to estimate the parameters of this model using empirical data. We demonstrate this procedure by characterizing the role of changes in cortico-cortical coupling, in the genesis of ERPs. In the first experiment, ERPs recorded during the perception of faces and houses were modeled as distinct cortical sources in the ventral visual pathway. Category-selectivity, as indexed by the face-selective N170, could be explained by category-specific differences in forward connections from sensory to higher areas in the ventral stream. We were able to quantify and make inferences about these effects using conditional estimates of connectivity. This allowed us to identify where, in the processing stream, category-selectivity emerged. In the second experiment, we used an auditory oddball paradigm to show that the mismatch negativity can be explained by changes in connectivity. Specifically, using Bayesian model selection, we assessed changes in backward connections, above and beyond changes in forward connections. In accord with theoretical predictions, there was strong evidence for learning-related changes in both forward and backward coupling. These examples show that category- or context-specific coupling among cortical regions can be assessed explicitly, within a mechanistic, biologically motivated inference framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as David et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Dynamic causal models (DCMs)1 have also been implemented for a range of measurement techniques other than fMRI, including electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and local field potentials (LFPs) obtained from invasive recordings in humans or animals, both in the time domain (Daunizeau et al., 2009b; David et al., 2006; Kiebel et al., 2006) and frequency domain (Chen et al., 2”
From Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling (2010) · cites this paper as David et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1994) · Cited by 15,411
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations
Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5 · Cited by 5,131
Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations
Kloeden, P. E. 1., & Platen, E. (2016) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-45-rc1 · Cited by 5,119
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationDistributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex
Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063736 · Cited by 3,940
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
A cortical representation of the local visual environment
Epstein, R. A., & Kanwisher, N. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33402 · Cited by 3,083
Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00328-2 · Cited by 1,664
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Press, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 618
Accelerating Computation of DCM for ERP with GPU-Based Parallel Strategy
Wang, W.-J., Hsieh, I.-F., & Chen, C. (2012) · Autonomic and Trusted Computing · doi:10.1109/uic-atc.2012.74 · Cited by 1
4.2 Clinical Applications: Epilepsy
Laufs, H., & Thornton, R. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372731.003.0018 · Cited by 1
Neurophysiologische Untersuchungsmethoden in der Psychiatrie
Pogarell, O. M., & Karch, S. (2017) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45028-0_28-2 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Causal Modelling of Dynamic Dysfunction in NMDA-Receptor Antibody Encephalitis
Rosch, R. E., Cooray, G., & Friston, K. J. (2017) · Springer series in bio-/neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49959-8_6 · Cited by 1
Self-citationKarameh, F. N., & Nahas, Z. H. (2018) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-018-0666-3 · Cited by 1
Iyer, K. K., Copland, D. A., & Angwin, A. J. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2020.0867 · Cited by 1
Quinn, C. J., Coleman, T. P., & Kiyavash, N. (2010) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
An Introduction to MEG Connectivity Measurements
Brookes, M. J., Woolrich, M. W., & Price, D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_16-1 · Cited by 1
A primer on predictive coding and network modeling
Eggermont, J. J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15548-2.00001-6 · Cited by 1
Nikouei, M., & Abdali-Mohammadi, F. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2023.2244110 · Cited by 1
Optimising a computational model of human auditory cortex with an evolutionary algorithm
Tomana, E., Härtwich, N., Rozmarynowski, A., König, R., May, P., & Sielużycki, C. (2023) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2023.108879 · Cited by 1
Popescu, A., & Buiu, C. (2023) · Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics · doi:10.61416/ceai.v25i4.8846 · Cited by 1
Niedernhuber, M., Fardo, F., Allen, M., & Bekinschtein, T. A. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.149 · Cited by 1
Olivier David, A. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00333-x · Cited by 2
State space models and their spectral decomposition in dynamic causal modeling
Moran, R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.006 · Cited by 1
Dawuni, M., & K, F. D. (2015) · African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research · doi:10.5897/ajmcsr2014.0569 · Cited by 1
Improved Back-Projection Cortical Potential Imaging by Multi-resolution Optimization Technique
Haor, D., Joffe, R., Shavit, R., Peremen, Z., Stern, Y., & Geva, A. (2018) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-018-0668-1
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.003 · Cited by 1
Ross, A., Paulk, A. C., Cash, S. S., Widge, A. S., & Basu, I. (2022) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871719 · Cited by 1
Portnova, G. V., Oknina, L. B., Masherov, E. L., Slezkin, A. A., & Подлепич, В. В. (2023) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-023-01409-5 · Cited by 1
Popescu, A., & Buiu, C. (2024) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62520-6_12 · Cited by 1
An information theoretic approach to EEG-fMRI integration
Ostwald, D. (2010) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 1
Neuronal activity and ion homeostasis in the hypoxic brain
Zandt, B. (2013) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036535991 · Cited by 1
Variational Bayesian parameter estimation techniques for the general linear modelPreprint
Starke, L., & Ostwald, D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/077461 · Cited by 1
Dynamic causal modeling of layered magnetoencephalographic event-related responsesPreprint
Ihle, S. J., Bonaiuto, J. J., Bestmann, S., Stephan, K. E., Barnes, G. R., & Heinzle, J. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.20.208504 · Cited by 2
Instruction Cues Increase Brain Network Complexity During Movement Preparation
Wang, N., Zhang, L.-P., Zhang, R., Ma, L.-Y., Niu, D., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., & Hu, Y.-X. (2021) · Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) · doi:10.1007/s12204-021-2342-0
Knösche, T. R. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_65-1 · Cited by 1
Knösche, T. R. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_65-2 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Causal Modeling in Probabilistic Programming LanguagesPreprint
Baldy, N., Woodman, M., Jirsa, V., & Hashemi, M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.06.622230 · Cited by 1
Decoding Cognitive Performance from EEG Using Energy-Based and Biophysical ModelsPreprint
Anwar, A., & Rizvi, N. Z. (2025) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8yqxp_v1 · Cited by 1
Ziaeemehr, A., Woodman, M., Domide, L., Petkoski, S., Jirsa, V., & Hashemi, M. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106194.2 · Cited by 1
Ziaeemehr, A., Woodman, M., Domide, L., Petkoski, S., Jirsa, V., & Hashemi, M. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106194.3 · Cited by 2
Diminishing Arousal Shifts the Balance of Cortical Networks Supporting Spatial AttentionPreprint
Niedernhuber, M., Carmel, D. P., Bekinschtein, T. A., & Bareham, C. A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.08.692359 · Cited by 1
Peraza, J. A., Martínez-Montes, E., Aubert, E., Valdes-Hernandez, P. A., & Mulet, R. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.11.014 · Cited by 8
Semantic Feature Type Constrains the Organization and Computation of Concrete Conceptual Knowledge
Amsel, B. D. (2011) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Prediction error dependent changes in brain connectivity during associative learning
den Ouden, H. E. M. (2009) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
System Models for Inference on Mechanisms of Neuronal Dynamics
Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Wiley-VCH eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100042
Self-citationElectrophysiological Events Related to Top-Down Contrast Sensitivity Control
Mišić, B., Schneider, B., de la Rosa, S., Alain, C., & McIntosh, A. R. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70033-3
Reliability of Dynamic Causal Modeling using the Statistical Parametric Mapping Toolbox
Hosseini, P. T., Wang, S., Brinton, J., Bell, S. L., & Simpson, D. M. (2014) · International Journal of System Dynamics Applications · doi:10.4018/ijsda.2014040101
Neural mass model parameter identification for MEG/EEG
Kybic, J., Faugeras, O. D., Clerc, M., & Papadopoulo, T. (2007) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.709146
Performance bounds for dynamic causal modeling of brain connectivity
Wu, S. C., & Swindlehurst, A. L. (2012) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2012.6346111
A Connectionist Perspective on Attentional Effects in Neurodynamics Data
Olivier David, A. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70573-4_8
Jones, S., & Pritchett, D. L. (2007)
So, K. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Inferring Effective Connectivity from fMRI Data
Stephan, K. E., Baojuan Li, A., Iglesias, S., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · Biological magnetic resonance · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7591-1_13
Self-citationAbbas Babajani-feremi, A., & Hamid Soltanian-zadeh, A. (2007) · Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
State space methods for MEG source reconstruction
Fukushima, M., Yamashita, O., & Sato, M.-A. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.004
Hu, Z., Ni, P., Wan, Q., Zhang, Y., Shi, P., & Lin, Q. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep29426
3.8 Analyzing Effective Connectivity with EEG and MEG
Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372731.003.0015
Self-citationAutoregressive modeling of fMRI time series: state space approaches and the general linear model
Galka, A., Siniatchkin, M., Stephani, U., Groening, K., Wolff, S., Bosch‐Bayard, J., & Ozaki, T. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.005
Yusoff, A. N., Mohamad, M., Hamid, K. A., Ismafairus, A., Hamid, A., Zamratol-Mai, S., & Mukari, S. (2011)
The neurobiological basis of inter-individual variability in visual perception
Song, C. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Michalopoulos, K. (2014) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Algoritmos para inferência de conectividade neural em potenciais evento-relacionados.
Rodrigues, P. L. C. (2017) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.3.2017.tde-17032017-094453
Detecting Resting-state Neural Connectivity Using Dynamic Network Analysis on Multiband fMRI DataPreprint
Zhuang, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10713
Causal Modeling: Methods and Their Application to Speech and Language
Baojuan Li, A., Ahlfors, S. P., Pinotsis, D. A., Friston, K. J., & Mody, M. (2017) · Innovations in cognitive neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7325-5_8
Self-citationHybrid Active InferencePreprint
Ofner, A., & Stober, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.02647
Shortcuts for fear in hierarchical visual systems
McFadyen, J. (2019) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2019.269
Data-driven neural mass modelling
Poole, E. I., & Sofia, L. (2019) · TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
Dynamic Parameter Estimation of Brain MechanismsPreprint
Hsu, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11899
Computation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from network models of point neuronsPreprint
Martínez‐Cañada, P., Ness, T. V., Einevoll, G. T., Fellin, T., & Panzeri, S. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.02.364802 · Cited by 1
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.006
Penny, W. D. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_449-1
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.002
Series Expansion of Connectivity Matrices
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.013
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.009
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.014
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.015
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.001
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.007
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.004
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.010
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.008
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.011
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.005
Combinatorial Inferences for Networks
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.012
Zhao, Y., Boley, M., Pelentritou, A., Karoly, P. J., Freestone, D. R., Liu, Y., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., William, W., Liley, D. T. J., & Kuhlmann, L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.03.490402
Chung, M. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882610.016
Kahan, J., & Foltynie, T. (1998) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0374
XueQing, J. I., LanXiang, L. I. U., Dong, C. U. I., & Xiaoli Li, A. (2011) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/zf2011-41-8-978
Neuroimaging, Neural Population Models for
Bojak, I., & Breakspear, M. J. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1006-0_70
Penny, W. D. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1006-0_449
Knösche, T. R. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1006-0_65
Knösche, T. R., & Haueisen, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74918-7_4
Knösche, T. R., & Haueisen, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74918-7_6
Iyer, K. K., Bell, N., Copland, D. A., Arnott, W. L., Wilson, W. J., & Angwin, A. J. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108532
Ihalainen, R., Annen, J., Gosseries, O., Cardone, P., Panda, R., Martial, C., Thibaut, A., Laureys, S., & Chennu, S. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.07.544105
Brain networks involved in deviance and novelty detection: Are they sensory modality specific?
Eggermont, J. J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15548-2.00010-7
Data-driven neural mass modelling
Sofia, L. (2019) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-131745
Nuzuliyah, L., Hanani, N., Toiba, H., & Sujarwo, S. (2024) · Asian Economic and Financial Review · doi:10.55493/5002.v14i7.5111
Dynamic causal modeling of P300 processing in schizophrenia
Zhang, S., Jiang, L., Wang, G., Yao, D., Xu, P., & Li, F. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA) · doi:10.1109/civemsa58715.2024.10586544
Dunstan, D. M., Chan, S. Y. S., & Goodfellow, M. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.07.15.24310128
Ketamine and Psilocybin Differentially Impact Sensory Learning During the Mismatch NegativityPreprint
Allohverdi, S. G., Soltanzadeh, M., Schmidt, A., Charlton, C. E., Hauke, D. J., Karvelis, P., Vollenweider, F. X., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4492873/v1
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Brain Activity
de Steen, F. V., Friston, K. J., Zeidman, P., Pinotsis, D. A., Nagels, G., & Marinazzo, D. (2025) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-4438-6_8
Self-citationStatistics, Data Science, and the Connectome
Lindquist, M. A., Caffo, B. S., Kang, J., Simpson, S. L., Pinto-Orellana, M. A., Ting, C., Shojaie, A., Guindani, M., & Ombao, H. (2025) · Statistics and data science in imaging. · doi:10.1080/29979676.2025.2569894
Testing for Interactions in Multivariate DataPreprint
Penny, W. D., Sambrook, T., & Renoult, L. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.26.690868
Extended Dynamical Causal Modelling for Phase Coupling (eDCM PC)
Yeldesbay, A., & Daun, S. (2025) · Journal of Open Research Software · doi:10.5334/jors.412
Penny, W. D. (2015) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6675-8_449
Applications to Brain Networks
Sparacino, L. (2026) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05416-6_6
Metadata
- Authors
- David, O., Kiebel, S. J., Harrison, L. M., Mattout, J., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kiebel, Stefan J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1255-1272
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053773581
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inserm.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, event-related potentials, event-related fields, corticocortical connections, source localization, Bayesian model selection, N170, face perception, ventral stream, mismatch negativity, auditory oddball paradigm
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Pathways, Bayes Theorem, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Pitch Perception, Visual Pathways, Magnetoencephalography, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
