The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG
Open accessAbstract
Neuronally plausible, generative or forward models are essential for understanding how event-related fields (ERFs) and potentials (ERPs) are generated. In this paper, we present a new approach to modeling event-related responses measured with EEG or MEG. This approach uses a biologically informed model to make inferences about the underlying neuronal networks generating responses. The approach can be regarded as a neurobiologically constrained source reconstruction scheme, in which the parameters of the reconstruction have an explicit neuronal interpretation. Specifically, these parameters encode, among other things, the coupling among sources and how that coupling depends upon stimulus attributes or experimental context. The basic idea is to supplement conventional electromagnetic forward models, of how sources are expressed in measurement space, with a model of how source activity is generated by neuronal dynamics. A single inversion of this extended forward model enables inference about both the spatial deployment of sources and the underlying neuronal architecture generating them. Critically, this inference covers long-range connections among well-defined neuronal subpopulations. In a previous paper, we simulated ERPs using a hierarchical neural-mass model that embodied bottom-up, top-down and lateral connections among remote regions. In this paper, we describe a Bayesian procedure to estimate the parameters of this model using empirical data. We demonstrate this procedure by characterizing the role of changes in cortico-cortical coupling, in the genesis of ERPs. In the first experiment, ERPs recorded during the perception of faces and houses were modeled as distinct cortical sources in the ventral visual pathway. Category-selectivity, as indexed by the face-selective N170, could be explained by category-specific differences in forward connections from sensory to higher areas in the ventral stream. We were able to quantify and make inferences about these effects using conditional estimates of connectivity. This allowed us to identify where, in the processing stream, category-selectivity emerged. In the second experiment, we used an auditory oddball paradigm to show that the mismatch negativity can be explained by changes in connectivity. Specifically, using Bayesian model selection, we assessed changes in backward connections, above and beyond changes in forward connections. In accord with theoretical predictions, there was strong evidence for learning-related changes in both forward and backward coupling. These examples show that category- or context-specific coupling among cortical regions can be assessed explicitly, within a mechanistic, biologically motivated inference framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as David et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Dynamic causal models (DCMs)1 have also been implemented for a range of measurement techniques other than fMRI, including electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and local field potentials (LFPs) obtained from invasive recordings in humans or animals, both in the time domain (Daunizeau et al., 2009b; David et al., 2006; Kiebel et al., 2006) and frequency domain (Chen et al., 2”
From Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling (2010) · cites this paper as David et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1994) · Cited by 15,411
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations
Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5 · Cited by 5,131
Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations
Kloeden, P. E. 1., & Platen, E. (2016) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-45-rc1 · Cited by 5,119
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationDistributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex
Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063736 · Cited by 3,940
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
A cortical representation of the local visual environment
Epstein, R. A., & Kanwisher, N. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33402 · Cited by 3,083
Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00328-2 · Cited by 1,664
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Press, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 618
Dynamic causal modelling of anticipatory skin conductance responses
Bach, D. R., Jean Daunizeau, A., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.007 · Cited by 107
Self-citationVariational Bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG
Kiebel, S. J., Jean Daunizeau, A., Phillips, C. L. M., & Friston, K. J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.005 · Cited by 105
Self-citationDistributed processing; distributed functions?
Fox, P. T., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.051 · Cited by 99
Self-citationChallenges and Future Perspectives on Electroencephalogram-Based Biometrics in Person Recognition
Chan, H.-L., Kuo, P., Cheng, C., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2018.00066 · Cited by 104
Dynamic causal modeling with neural fields
Pinotsis, D. A., Moran, R., & Friston, K. J. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.020 · Cited by 106
Self-citationReading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
Woodhead, Z., Barnes, G. R., Penny, W. D., Moran, R., Teki, S., Price, C. J., & Leff, A. P. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs365 · Cited by 103
Dynamic causal modelling of distributed electromagnetic responses
Jean Daunizeau, A., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.062 · Cited by 103
Self-citationMechanisms of hemispheric specialization: Insights from analyses of connectivity
Stephan, K. E., Fink, G. R., & Marshall, J. C. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.002 · Cited by 101
Moran, R. J., Jung, F., Kumagai, T., Endepols, H., Graf, R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., & Tittgemeyer, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022790 · Cited by 88
Self-citationCausal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging
Weichwald, S., Meyer, T., Özdenizci, O., Schölkopf, B., Tonio Ball, A., & Grosse‐Wentrup, M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.036 · Cited by 95
Computational models of epilepsy
Stefanescu, R. A., Shivakeshavan, R. G., & Talathi, S. S. (2012) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2012.08.012 · Cited by 99
Brain Imaging Techniques and Their Applications in Decision-Making Research
Xue, G., Chen, C., Lu, Z., & Dong, Q. (2010) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2010.00120 · Cited by 109
A brain atlas of axonal and synaptic delays based on modelling of cortico-cortical evoked potentials
Lemaréchal, J.-D., Jedynak, M., Trébaul, L., Boyer, A., Tadel, F., Bhattacharjee, M., Deman, P., Tuyisenge, V., Ayoubian, L., Hugues, E., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab362 · Cited by 114
Predictive Coding and Pitch Processing in the Auditory Cortex
Kumar, S., Sedley, W., Nourski, K. V., Kawasaki, H., Oya, H., Patterson, R. D., Howard, M. A., Friston, K. J., & Griffiths, T. D. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00021 · Cited by 91
Self-citationStructural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection
Sokolov, A. A., Zeidman, P., Erb, M., Ryvlin, P., Friston, K. J., & Pavlova, M. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1812859115 · Cited by 94
Self-citationDisconnection's renaissance takes shape: Formal incorporation in group-level lesion studies
Rudrauf, D., MEHTA, S., & Grabowski, T. J. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.005 · Cited by 92
Circadian dynamics in measures of cortical excitation and inhibition balance
Chellappa, S. L., Gaggioni, G., Ly, J. Q. M., Papachilleos, S., Borsu, C., Brzozowski, A., Rosanova, M., Sarasso, S., Luxen, A., Middleton, B., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep33661 · Cited by 84
Population dynamics under the Laplace assumption
Marreiros, A. C., Kiebel, S. J., Jean Daunizeau, A., Harrison, L. M., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.008 · Cited by 85
Self-citationStudying Network Mechanisms Using Intracranial Stimulation in Epileptic Patients
Olivier David, A., Bastin, J., Chabardès, S., Minotti, L., & Kahane, P. (2010) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00148 · Cited by 102
Schendan, H. E., & Maher, S. M. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.061 · Cited by 88
The Rise and Fall of the Recent Past
Huber, D. E. (2013) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00005-6 · Cited by 86
Dietz, M. J., Friston, K. J., Mattingley, J. B., Roepstorff, A., & Garrido, M. I. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3765-13.2014 · Cited by 86
Self-citationImpaired short-term memory for pitch in congenital amusia.
Tillmann, B., Lévêque, Y., Fornoni, L., Albouy, P., & Caclin, A. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.035 · Cited by 76
Jin, S., Lin, P. T., & Hallett, M. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.033 · Cited by 82
Losing Control Under Ketamine: Suppressed Cortico-Hippocampal Drive Following Acute Ketamine in Rats
Moran, R., Jones, M. W., Blockeel, A. J., Adams, R. A., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.184 · Cited by 76
Self-citationBiophysical network models and the human connectome
Woolrich, M. W., & Stephan, K. E. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.059 · Cited by 78
Understanding DCM: Ten simple rules for the clinician
Kahan, J., & Foltynie, T. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.008 · Cited by 78
Seizure prediction in hippocampal and neocortical epilepsy using a model-based approach
Aarabi, A., & He, B. (2013) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.051 · Cited by 76
Phillips, H. N., Blenkmann, A. O., Hughes, L. E., Bekinschtein, T. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5095-14.2015 · Cited by 83
Phillips, H. N., Blenkmann, A. O., Hughes, L. E., Kochen, S. S., Bekinschtein, T. A., Cam‐CAN, & Rowe, J. B. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.001 · Cited by 77
Ranlund, S., Adams, R. A., Díez, Á., Constante, M., Dutt, A., Hall, M., Maestro Carbayo, A., McDonald, C., Petrella, S., Schulze, K., et al. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23035 · Cited by 77
Self-citationSumner, R. L., Spriggs, M. J., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Kirk, I. J. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.013 · Cited by 83
Quantitative theory of driven nonlinear brain dynamics
Roberts, J. A., & Robinson, P. A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.054 · Cited by 77
A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem
Lamus, C., Hämäläinen, M. S., Temereanca, S., Brown, E. N., & Purdon, P. L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.020 · Cited by 71
Network Perspectives on Epilepsy Using EEG/MEG Source Connectivity
van Mierlo, P., Höller, Y., Focke, N. K., & Vulliémoz, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00721 · Cited by 79
Nonlinear System Identification of Neural Systems from Neurophysiological Signals
He, F., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.001 · Cited by 76
Stochastic models of neuronal dynamics
Harrison, L. M., Olivier David, A., & Friston, K. J. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1648 · Cited by 77
Self-citationAlbouy, P., Mattout, J., Sanchez, G., Tillmann, B., & Caclin, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00020 · Cited by 76
Self-citationTimmermann, C., Spriggs, M. J., Kaelen, M., Leech, R., Nutt, D., Moran, R., Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. (2017) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.039 · Cited by 75
Dynamic causal modeling of touch-evoked potentials in the rubber hand illusion
Zeller, D., Friston, K. J., & Claßen, J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.065 · Cited by 78
Self-citationDynamic Causal Models for phase coupling
Penny, W. D., Vladimir Litvak, A., Fuentemilla, L., Düzel, E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.06.029 · Cited by 73
Self-citationMulti-subject analyses with dynamic causal modeling
Kasess, C. H., Stephan, K. E., Weissenbacher, A., Pezawas, L., Moser, E., & Windischberger, C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.037 · Cited by 70
The Unpredictive Brain Under Threat: A Neurocomputational Account of Anxious Hypervigilance
Cornwell, B. R., Garrido, M. I., Overstreet, C. M., Pine, D. S., & Grillon, C. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.031 · Cited by 73
Schendan, H. E., & Ganis, G. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00329 · Cited by 73
Axonal Velocity Distributions in Neural Field Equations
Bojak, I., & Liley, D. T. J. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000653 · Cited by 71
Ishii, R., Canuet, L., Herdman, A. T., Gunji, A., Iwase, M., Takahashi, H., Nakahachi, T., Hirata, M., Robinson, S. E., Pantev, C., et al. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.023 · Cited by 67
Legon, W., Punzell, S., Dowlati, E. P., Adams, S. E., Stiles, A. B., & Moran, R. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv200 · Cited by 69
Garrido, M. I., Barnes, G. R., Kumaran, D., Maguire, E. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.016 · Cited by 72
Stefanics, G., & Czigler, I. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.068 · Cited by 69
Dynamic Causal Modelling of epileptic seizure propagation pathways: A combined EEG–fMRI study
Murta, T., Leal, A., Garrido, M. I., & Figueiredo, P. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.053 · Cited by 66
Brovelli, A., Chicharro, D., Badier, J., Wang, H., & Jirsa, V. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4892-14.2015 · Cited by 61
Campo, P., Garrido, M. I., Moran, R., Maestú, F., García‐Morales, I., Gil‐Nagel, A., del Pozo, F., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr201 · Cited by 64
Self-citationAttal, Y., Maeß, B., Friederici, A. D., & Olivier David, A. (2012) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/rns.2011.056 · Cited by 64
Dynamic causal modelling of lateral interactions in the visual cortex
Pinotsis, D. A., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Vladimir Litvak, A., Rees, G. E., Barnes, G. R., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.078 · Cited by 64
Self-citationBrain Signals of Face Processing as Revealed by Event-Related Potentials
Olivares, E. I., Iglesias, J., Saavedra, C., Trujillo‐Barreto, N. J., & Valdés-Sosa, M. J. (2015) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2015/514361 · Cited by 76
Nonlinear Coupling in the Human Motor System
Chen, C., Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., Kiebel, S. J., Jolly, R., & Ward, N. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1194-09.2010 · Cited by 62
Self-citationNeuroimaging of Cognition: Past, Present, and Future
Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.038 · Cited by 67
A data-driven framework for neural field modeling
Freestone, D. R., Aram, P., Dewar, M., Scerri, K., Grayden, D. B., & Kadirkamanathan, V. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.027 · Cited by 59
Cheyette, S., & Plaut, D. C. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.016 · Cited by 60
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Subcortical Connectivity of Language
Olivier David, A., Maeß, B., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3433-10.2011 · Cited by 63
Subjective Rating of Weak Tactile Stimuli Is Parametrically Encoded in Event-Related Potentials
Auksztulewicz, R., & Blankenburg, F. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4243-12.2013 · Cited by 61
Dynamic causal modeling of spontaneous fluctuations in skin conductance
Bach, D. R., Jean Daunizeau, A., Külzow, N., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01052.x · Cited by 60
Self-citationAgeing changes effective connectivity of motor networks during bimanual finger coordination
Loehrer, P. A., Nettersheim, F. S., Jung, F., Weber, I., Huber, C. A., Dembek, T. A., Pelzer, E. A., Fink, G. R., Tittgemeyer, M., & Timmermann, L. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.014 · Cited by 59
Taking the EEG Back Into the Brain: The Power of Multiple Discrete Sources
Scherg, M., Berg, P., Nakasato, N., & Beniczky, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00855 · Cited by 60
Djebbara, Z., Jensen, O. B., Parada, F. J., & Gramann, K. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104715 · Cited by 71
Schendan, H. E., & Lucia, L. C. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.062 · Cited by 59
Incorporating priors for EEG source imaging and connectivity analysis
Lei, X., Wu, T., & Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00284 · Cited by 56
Inverse problems in dynamic cognitive modeling
Graben, P. B., & Potthast, R. (2009) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.3097067 · Cited by 58
Auditory training changes temporal lobe connectivity in ‘Wernicke’s aphasia’: a randomised trial
Woodhead, Z. V., Crinion, J., Teki, S., Penny, W., Price, C. J., & Leff, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314621 · Cited by 56
Fukushima, M., Yamashita, O., Knösche, T. R., & Sato, M.-A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.066 · Cited by 56
Herz, D. M., Christensen, M. S., Reck, C., Florin, E., Barbe, M. T., Stahlhut, C., Pauls, K. A. M., Tittgemeyer, M., Siebner, H. R., & Timmermann, L. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.042 · Cited by 56
Tillmann, B., Albouy, P., & Caclin, A. (2015) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62630-1.00033-0 · Cited by 55
Gilbert, J. R., Yarrington, J. S., Wills, K. E., Nugent, A. C., & Zarate, C. A. (2018) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyy041 · Cited by 55
Neural mass model-based tracking of anesthetic brain states
Kuhlmann, L., Freestone, D. R., Manton, J. H., Heyse, B., Vereecke, H. E. M., Lipping, T., Struys, M. M. R. F., & Liley, D. T. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.039 · Cited by 52
EEG Mapping and Source Imaging
Michel, C. M., & He, B. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190228484.003.0045 · Cited by 56
A survey of brain network analysis by electroencephalographic signals
Luo, C., Li, F., Li, P., Yi, C., Li, C., Tao, Q., Zhang, X., Si, Y., Yao, D., Yin, G., et al. (2021) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-021-09689-8 · Cited by 54
Framework to study dynamic dependencies in networks of interacting processes
Chicharro, D., & Ledberg, A. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.041901 · Cited by 52
A dynamic causal model study of neuronal population dynamics
Marreiros, A. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.098 · Cited by 53
Self-citationYvert, G., Perrone‐Bertolotti, M., Baciu, M., & Olivier David, A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6434-11.2012 · Cited by 61
A Predictive Coding Perspective on Mismatch Negativity Impairment in Schizophrenia
Kirihara, K., Tada, M., Koshiyama, D., Fujioka, M., Usui, K., Araki, T., & Kasai, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00660 · Cited by 51
Efficient gradient computation for dynamical models
Sengupta, B., Friston, K. J., & Penny, W. D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.040 · Cited by 51
Self-citationRahmati, V., Kirmse, K., Marković, D., Holthoff, K., & Kiebel, S. J. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004736 · Cited by 53
Self-citationThe Computational Anatomy of Visual Neglect
Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx316 · Cited by 51
Self-citationBayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI
Wei, H., Jafarian, A., Zeidman, P., Vladimir Litvak, A., Razi, A., Hu, D., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116595 · Cited by 54
Self-citationReading therapy strengthens top–down connectivity in patients with pure alexia
Woodhead, Z., Penny, W. D., Barnes, G. R., Crewes, H., Wise, R. J. S., Price, C. J., & Leff, A. P. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt186 · Cited by 51
Sparse DCM for whole-brain effective connectivity from resting-state fMRI data
Prando, G., Zorzi, M., Bertoldo, A., Corbetta, M., Zorzi, M., & Chiuso, A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116367 · Cited by 50
Working Memory Load Modulates Neuronal Coupling
Pinotsis, D. A., Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy065 · Cited by 56
Preictal short-term plasticity induced by intracerebral 1 Hz stimulation
Olivier David, A., Woźniak-Kwaśniewska, A., Minotti, L., & Kahane, P. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.005 · Cited by 51
Multi-area neural mass modeling of EEG and MEG signals
Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., & Hamid Soltanian-zadeh, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.034 · Cited by 50
Freund, W., Wunderlich, A. P., Stuber, G., Mayer, F., Steffen, P. R. P., Mentzel, M., Weber, F., & Schmitz, B. (2010) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181cb4055 · Cited by 50
Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008045046-9.00308-9 · Cited by 50
Self-citationGeneric dynamic causal modelling: An illustrative application to Parkinson's disease
van Wijk, B. C. M., Cagnan, H., Vladimir Litvak, A., Kühn, A. A., & Friston, K. J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.039 · Cited by 47
Self-citationThe Brain Connectivity Workshops: Moving the frontiers of computational systems neuroscience
Stephan, K. E., Riera, J. J., Deco, G., & Horwitz, B. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.167 · Cited by 51
Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
Cooray, G., Sengupta, B., Douglas, P. K., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.063 · Cited by 47
Self-citationSanders, R. D., Banks, M. I., Darracq, M., Moran, R., SLEIGH, J. W., Gosseries, O., Bonhomme, V. L., Brichant, J. F., Rosanova, M., Raz, A., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.006 · Cited by 45
Dynamic causal modelling of fluctuating connectivity in resting-state EEG
de Steen, F. V., Almgren, H., Razi, A., Friston, K. J., & Marinazzo, D. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.055 · Cited by 47
Self-citationFlick, G., & Liina Pylkkänen, A. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.025 · Cited by 47
Wunderlich, A. P., Klug, R., Stuber, G., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Weber, F., & Freund, W. (2011) · The Open Neuroimaging Journal · doi:10.2174/1874440001105010001 · Cited by 47
Assessing functional connectivity of neural ensembles using directed information
So, K., Koralek, A. C., Ganguly, K., Gastpar, M., & Carmena, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026004 · Cited by 47
Role of white-matter pathways in coordinating alpha oscillations in resting visual cortex
Hindriks, R., Woolrich, M. W., Luckhoo, H., Joensson, M., Mohseni, H., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.057 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- David, O., Kiebel, S. J., Harrison, L. M., Mattout, J., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kiebel, Stefan J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1255-1272
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053773581
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inserm.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, event-related potentials, event-related fields, corticocortical connections, source localization, Bayesian model selection, N170, face perception, ventral stream, mismatch negativity, auditory oddball paradigm
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Pathways, Bayes Theorem, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Pitch Perception, Visual Pathways, Magnetoencephalography, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
