The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Maunsell, J., & van Essen, D. (1983) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.03-12-02563.1983 · Cited by 1,602
Angelucci (2002) · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002203 · Cited by 1,170
Jansen, B. H., & Rit, V. G. (1995) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00199471 · Cited by 1,159
On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing “drivers” from “modulators”
Sherman, S. M., & Guillery, R. W. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.7121 · Cited by 746 · cited 1×
“The distinction between dynamic and structural inputs speaks immediately to the difference between ‘drivers’ from ‘modulators’ (Sherman and Guillery, 1998).”
BackgroundDynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG
David, O., Kiebel, S. J., Harrison, L. M., Mattout, J., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.045 · Cited by 620
Self-citationEvent-related brain potentials: an introduction
Coles, M. G. H., & Rugg, M. D. (1996) · Electrophysiology of Mind · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524168.003.0001 · Cited by 396
Constraints on cortical and thalamic projections: the no-strong-loops hypothesis
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34584 · Cited by 353
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Friston, K. J. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700510 · Cited by 141 · cited 1×
“See Friston (2001) for a fuller discussion.”
Self-citation
Cited by
Thut, G., Schyns, P. G., & Gross, J. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00170 · Cited by 560
Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior
Cohen, M. X., & Donner, T. H. (2013) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00479.2013 · Cited by 494
Great Expectations: Is there Evidence for Predictive Coding in Auditory Cortex?
Heilbron, M., & Chait, M. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.061 · Cited by 428
Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain
Sanz-Leon, P., Knock, S. A., Spiegler, A., & Jirsa, V. K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.002 · Cited by 356
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns
Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- David, O., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1580-1591
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131856072
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.034
- The paper
- David, O., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J. (2006). Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
