Cited by 205Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsAction Observation and Synchronization

An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body

Thierry, Guillaume, Pegna, Alan J., Dodds, Chris, Roberts, Mark, Basan, Sébastien, Downing, Paul·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

One of the critical functions of vision is to provide information about other individuals. Neuroimaging experiments examining the cortical regions that analyze the appearance of other people have found partially overlapping networks that respond selectively to human faces and bodies. In event-related potential (ERP) studies, faces systematically elicit a negative component peaking 170 ms after presentation - the N170. To characterize the electrophysiological response to human bodies, we compared the ERPs elicited by faces, bodies and various control stimuli. In Experiment 1, a comparison of ERPs elicited by faces, bodies, objects and places showed that pictures of the human body (without the head) elicit a negative component peaking at 190 ms (an N190). While broadly similar to the N170, the N190 differs in both spatial distribution and amplitude from the N1 components elicited by faces, objects and scenes and peaks significantly later than the N170. The difference between N190 and N170 was further supported using topographic analyses of ERPs and source localization techniques. A unique, stable map topography was found to characterize human bodies between 130 and 230 ms. In Experiment 2, we tested the four conditions from Experiment 1, as well as intact and scrambled silhouettes and stick figures of the human body. We found that intact silhouettes and stick figures elicited significantly greater N190 amplitudes than their scrambled counterparts. Thus, the N190 generalizes to some degree to schematic depictions of the human form. Overall, our findings are consistent with intertwined, but functionally distinct, neural representations of the human face and body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 205

Authors
Thierry, G., Pegna, A. J., Dodds, C., Roberts, M., Basan, S., & Downing, P.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Thierry, Guillaume
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
871-879
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115567738
Cited by
205
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royal Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
N170, face perception, body image, event-related potentials, body shape, stick figures, face-selective neural responses, topographic mapping, source localization
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Contingent Negative Variation, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Occipital Lobe, Parietal Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Human Body

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review