The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure
Open accessAbstract
Neuropsychological and neurophysiological evidence point to a role for the left fusiform gyrus in visual word recognition, but the specific nature of this role remains a topic of debate. The aim of this study was to measure the sensitivity of this region to sublexical orthographic structure. We measured blood oxygenation (BOLD) changes in the brain with functional magnetic resonance imaging while fluent readers of English viewed meaningless letter strings. The stimuli varied systematically in their approximation to English orthography, as measured by the probability of occurrence of letters and sequential letter pairs (bigrams) comprising the string. A whole-brain analysis showed a single region in the lateral left fusiform gyrus where BOLD signal increased with letter sequence probability; no other brain region showed this response pattern. The results suggest tuning of this cortical area to letter probabilities as a result of perceptual experience and provide a possible neural correlate for the 'word superiority effect' observed in letter perception research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“led to suggestions that learning to read tuned the receptive properties of the underlying neurons to combinations of letters (such as bigrams and trigrams) that are found within familiar words (Cohen and Dehaene, 2004; Binder et al., 2006).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Binder et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · Cited by 5,500
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889
Handbook of perception and human performance
Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J. P. (1986) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 4,033
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
A cortical representation of the local visual environment
Epstein, R. A., & Kanwisher, N. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33402 · Cited by 3,083
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 286
Numbers are not like words: Different pathways for literacy and numeracy
Carreiras, M., Monahan, P. J., Lizarazu, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Molinaro, N. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.021 · Cited by 41
“This region responds more to real words and pseudowords than consonant strings or false fonts (Baker et al., 2007; Binder et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2002; Reinke et al., 2008).”
BackgroundConant, L. L., Liebenthal, E., Desai, A., & Binder, J. R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.055 · Cited by 37
“, 2001, 2004; Polk and Farah, 2002), while showing significant sensitivity to statistical familiarity of letter sequences (Binder et al., 2006).”
Self-citationHertrich, I., Dietrich, S., Moos, A., Trouvain, J., & Ackermann, H. (2009) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554790802709054 · Cited by 37
“This region has been found to be engaged in phonological operations ( Binder, Medler, Westbury, Liebenthal, & Buchanan, 2006 ; Cone, Burman, Bitan, Bolger, & Booth, 2008 ; Dietz, Jones, Gareau, Zeffiro, & Eden, 2005 ), ie, the processing of speech sound sequences such as required, eg, in rhyming tasks.”
BackgroundHow the brain composes morphemes into meaning
Gwilliams, L. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0311 · Cited by 41
Brain mechanisms of recovery from pure alexia: A single case study with multiple longitudinal scans
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., McCormick, S. F., Durant, S., & Zanker, J. M. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.009 · Cited by 38
“It is unclear whether the VWFA acts as a unique bottleneck for reading, or whether alternative routes are available for recovery.”
InfluentialSabsevitz, D. S., Middlebrooks, E. H., Tatum, W. O., Grewal, S. S., Wharen, R. E., & Ritaccio, A. L. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.012 · Cited by 37
Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding
Whitney, C. (2007) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.002 · Cited by 35
Pathways of the inferior frontal occipital fasciculus in overt speech and reading
Rollans, C., Cheema, K., Georgiou, G. K., & Cummine, J. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.011 · Cited by 40
“…investigating the role of the visual word form area in reading have noted that this region is sensitive to sub-lexical orthographic structure (Binder et al., 2006), such that there are increases in activity in this region as a function of familiar letter combinations, and not just whole…”
BackgroundSimos, P. G., Rezaie, R., Fletcher, J. M., Juranek, J. J., Passaro, A. D., Li, Z., Cirino, P. T., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2011) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0022550 · Cited by 35
The syllabic bridge: the first step in learning spelling-to-sound correspondences*
Doignon‐Camus, N., & Zagar, D. (2013) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000913000305 · Cited by 33
“These results are in line with recent imaging data (Binder et al., 2006; Turk-Browne et al., 2008; Vinckier et al., 2007) and the proposal of Dehaene et al. (2005), and highlight the power and the efficiency of the statistical learning mechanism in perceiving letter clusters in prereaders.”
ResultProtopapas, A., Orfanidou, E., Taylor, J. S. H., Karavasilis, E., Kapnoula, E. C., Panagiotaropoulou, G., Velonakis, G., Poulou, L. S., Smyrnis, N., & Kelekis, D. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.013 · Cited by 39
“, 2008), for more familiar pseudoword strings (compared to less familiar strings; Binder et al., 2006), or for case-deviant and letter-deviant stimuli (compared to non-deviant; Kronbichler et al.”
Chan, S., Tang, S., Tang, K.-W., Lee, W.-K., Lo, S.-S., & Kwong, K. K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.078 · Cited by 32
“In our study, the gradual shift of the brain activations in the orthographic recognition from Korean characters to non-pronounceable pseudo-characters with Chinese radicals was in line with the findings in alphabetic languages of Vinckier et al. (2007) and Binder et al. (2006).”
InfluentialReading Increases the Compositionality of Visual Word Representations
Agrawal, A., Hari, K., & Arun, S. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1177/0956797619881134 · Cited by 24
“Evidence in favor of this account comes from the increased activation of VWFA as letter strings become orthographically similar to real words (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundA general-purpose mechanism of visual feature association in visual word identification and beyond
Vidal, Y., Viviani, E., Zoccolan, D., & Crepaldi, D. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.017 · Cited by 36
Early Top-Down Modulation in Visual Word Form Processing: Evidence From an Intracranial SEEG Study
Liu, Y., Shi, G., Li, M., Xing, H., Song, Y., Xiao, L., Guan, Y., & Han, Z. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2288-20.2021 · Cited by 31
“Visual word form information is coded in the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007; Bruno et al., 2008; Woolnough et al., 2021), whereas nonvisual lexical information is processed in multiple cortices (e.g., semantics, anterior temporal gyrus, inferior…”
BackgroundAn fMRI meta-analysis of the role of the striatum in everyday-life vs laboratory-developed habits
Guida, P., Michiels, M., Redgrave, P., Luque, D., & Obeso, I. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104826 · Cited by 32
You, H., Gaab, N., Wei, N., Cheng‐Lai, A., Wang, Z., Jian, J., Song, M., Meng, X., & Ding, G. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.003 · Cited by 33
“…suggest that this area is responsible for the extraction of abstract visual word form, i.e., feature-invariant, pre-lexical, visual word recognition (Binder et al., 2006; Dehaene et al., 2005); some argue that it is more likely to be involved in lexical processing (Kronbichler et al., 2006, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialYablonski, M., Karipidis, I. I., Kubota, E. C., & Yeatman, J. D. (2024) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26655 · Cited by 31
“…studies have reported a hierarchy in the VTC, where sensitivity to lexical features and abstract language information increases along the posterior – anterior axis (Binder et al., 2006; Olulade et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2019; van der Mark et al., 2009; Vinckier et al., 2007; Zhan et al., 2023).”
BackgroundShort-term language experience shapes the plasticity of the visual word form area
Song, Y., Bu, Y., Hu, S., Luo, Y., & Jia Liu, B. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.086 · Cited by 31
Learning to Read Increases the Informativeness of Distributed Ventral Temporal Responses
Nordt, M., Gomez, J., Natu, V. S., Jeska, B., Barnett, M., & Kalanit Grill-spector, A. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy178 · Cited by 35
Telling the world’s least funny jokes: On the quantification of humor as entropy
Westbury, C. F., Shaoul, C., Moroschan, G., & Ramscar, M. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.001 · Cited by 30
Self-citationA normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
Izura, C., & Playfoot, D. R. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8 · Cited by 36
“Although bigram frequency effects are not commonly found in measures of word-naming performance, its influence has been detected when measuring brain activity (Binder, Medler, Westbury, Liebenthal, & Buchanan, 2006; Hauk, Davis, Ford, Pulvermüller & Marslen-Wilson, 2006; Hauk, Patterson et al., 2006) .”
BackgroundAdaptation of the human visual system to the statistics of letters and line configurations
Chang, C. H. C., Pallier, C., Wu, D. H., Nakamura, K., Jobert, A., Kuo, W., & Dehaene, S. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.028 · Cited by 30
“Consistent with this observation, previous studies found a larger activation for frequent letters and their combinations than for infrequent ones, an effect which grew from posterior to anterior occipital regions (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
ResultBaeck, A., Kravitz, D. J., Baker, C. I., & de Beeck, H. O. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.060 · Cited by 28
“characters and sublexical letter combinations (Binder et al., 2006; Dehaene et al., 2002, 2005; Vinckier et al., 2007), or does VWFA contain neurons tuned to entire words (Glezer et al.”
InfluentialTransposed letter priming with horizontal and vertical text in Japanese and English readers.
Witzel, N., Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0022194 · Cited by 30
Neurofunctionally dissecting the reading system in children
Liebig, J., Froehlich, E., Morawetz, C., Braun, M., Jacobs, A., Heekeren, H., & Ziegler, J. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.002 · Cited by 20
“(2010) found peak activation in the FG located posterior to the coordinates of the VWFA reported in adults (Binder et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2002; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHoversten, L. J., Brothers, T. A., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.026 · Cited by 28
“…have suggested that the area of the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex known as the visual word form area (VWFA) as well as an area in the right posterior occipital cortex are sensitive to the bigram frequency of pseudowords in a native language (Binder et al., 2006; Oganian et al., 2015).”
BackgroundDeep Learning of Orthographic Representations in Baboons
Hannagan, T., Ziegler, J. C., Dufau, S., Fagot, J., & Grainger, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084843 · Cited by 30
“However cognitive neuroscience has provided direct evidence [9,10] that letter combinations, so-called n-grams, are processed in the Visual Word Form Area - VWFA hereafter, a brain region that specifically responds to orthographic information in humans [11].”
BackgroundWang, K., Li, X., Huang, R., Ding, J., Song, L., & Zaizhu Han, A. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104721 · Cited by 27
Gagl, B., Richlan, F., Ludersdorfer, P., Sassenhagen, J., Eisenhauer, S., Gregorová, K., & Fiebach, C. J. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009995 · Cited by 27
Cognitive outcome of parietooccipital resection in children with epilepsy
Lippé, S., Bulteau, C., Dorfmüller, G., Audren, F., Delalande, O., & Jambaqué, I. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02651.x · Cited by 27
Skill dependent audiovisual integration in the fusiform induces repetition suppression
McNorgan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.12.002 · Cited by 26
“Previous work (Binder et al., 2006; Graves, Grabowski, Mehta, & Gupta, 2008; McNorgan, Awati, et al., 2013) lead us to predict that sub-additivity would be seen in left STG, and left FG, as primary phonological and orthographic processing regions, respectively.”
Alcauter, S., García-Mondragón, L., Gracia-Tabuenca, Z., Moreno, M. B., Ortiz, J. J., & Barrios, F. A. (2017) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.007 · Cited by 27
Sensory modality and spoken language shape reading network in blind readers of Braille
Tian, M., Saccone, E. J., Kim, J. S., Kanjlia, S., & Bedny, M. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac216 · Cited by 26
Cummine, J., Cribben, I., Luu, C., Kim, E., Bakhtiari, R., Georgiou, G. K., & Boliek, C. A. (2015) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000236 · Cited by 25
Dębska, A., Wójcik, M., Chyl, K., Dzięgiel-Fivet, G., & Jednoróg, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1199366 · Cited by 24
“There is an ongoing debate about whether LS-VOT processes whole-word (lexical) forms or whether LS-VOT is sensitive primarily to smaller orthographic parts like letters or bigrams (Dehaene et al., 2005; Binder et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe dynamics of language-related high-gamma activity assessed on a spatially-normalized brain
Kunii, N., Kamada, K., Ota, T., Greenblatt, R. E., Kawai, K., & Saito, N. (2012) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.06.006 · Cited by 25
“…depend on the cognitive function being performed, for example, various areas of the brain have been found to be associated with orthography (Binder et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2002; Tsapkini and Rapp, 2010), phonology (Binder et al., 2000; Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Rauschecker,…”
BackgroundMano, Q. R. (2016) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1141210 · Cited by 27
“Such an implication is difficult to reconcile with neuroimaging data showing the pOTS region to be sensitive to SCORe (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMathematics and Reading Develop Together in Young Children: Practical and Policy Considerations
Purpura, D. J., Litkowski, E. C., & Knopik, V. S. (2019) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732218815923 · Cited by 26
Wang, F., Kaneshiro, B., Strauber, C., Hasak, L. R., Nguyen, Q., Yakovleva, A., Vildavski, V., Norcia, A., & McCandliss, B. D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95627-x · Cited by 23
Embodiment of action-related language in the native and a late foreign language – An fMRI-study
Monaco, E. L., Mouthon, M., Britz, J., Sato, S., Stefanos‐Yakoub, I., Annoni, J., & Jost, L. B. (2023) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105312 · Cited by 25
“This is in line with previous studies that have linked a higher activation of this area with an increased processing demand for unfamiliar word forms as well (Binder et al., 2006; de Zubicaray et al., 2021).”
ResultTask by stimulus interactions in brain responses during Chinese character processing
Yang, J., Wang, X., Shu, H., & Zevin, J. D. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.036 · Cited by 24
“…presented stream of stimuli (Vinckier et al., 2007), detecting repeated stimuli from trial to trial (Wang et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2011) or detecting the nonlinguistic feature (ascenders, color, size, etc.) of the stimuli (Binder et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2008; Starrfelt and Gerlach, 2007).”
BackgroundVisuospatial complexity modulates reading in the brain
Rao, C., & Singh, N. C. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.010 · Cited by 24
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300369.001.0001 · Cited by 25
Wang, F., Nguyen, Q. T. H., Kaneshiro, B., Hasak, L. R., Wang, A. M., Toomarian, E. Y., Norcia, A. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2022) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13352 · Cited by 23
“Previous studies on adults have been limited to examining orthographic regularity by comparing words with typical versus atypical orthography (different bigram or trigram frequency of letter combinations) (Binder et al., 2006; Woollams et al., 2011).”
Savill, N. J., & Thierry, G. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.008 · Cited by 28
It's a word: Early electrophysiological response to the character likeness of pictographs
Zhang, M., Jiang, T., Mei, L., Yang, H., Chen, C., Xue, G., & Dong, Q. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01153.x · Cited by 25
“Both were in contrast with the leftlateralized orthographic and GPC effects on N170 based on alphabetic languages (Bentin et al., 1999; Binder et al., 2006; Simon et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
ResultRączy, K., Urbańczyk, A., Korczyk, M., Szewczyk, J., Sumera, E., & Marcin Szwed, A. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01407 · Cited by 24
“Similar to other reading studies (e.g., Glezer et al., 2015; Binder et al., 2006; Dehaene et al., 2002), we used pseudoword stimuli to minimize top–down semantic influences.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSigurdardottir, H. M., Ólafsdóttir, I. M., & Devillez, H. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111427 · Cited by 26
Letter order is not coded by open bigrams
Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. G. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.003 · Cited by 22
Ventura, P., Fernandes, T., Leite, I., Almeida, V. B., Casqueiro, I., & Wong, A. C. ‐. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01036 · Cited by 23
“…(Dehaene et al., 2004; Vinckier et al., 2007; Thesen et al., 2012): posterior parts respond to individual letters, irrespective of case (Dehaene et al., 2004; Thesen et al., 2012), whereas anterior parts respond to letter combinations such as bigrams (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMeng, X., You, H., Song, M., Desroches, A. S., Wang, Z., WEI, N., Tian, M., Gaab, N., & Ding, G. (2015) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000073 · Cited by 23
“Notably, this region is believed to be responsible for processing the orthographic structure of well-learned visual word forms (Puce, Allison, Asgari, Gore & McCarthy, 1996; Cohen, Dehaene, Naccache, Lehericy, Dehaene-Lambertz, Henaff & Michel, 2000; Kronbichler, Hutzler, Wimmer, Mair, Staffen & Ladurner, 2004; Kuo, Y…”
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.009 · Cited by 21
“Perhaps the context of the letters M and T helps to categorize stimulus 4 as a poor instance of letter A in ‘M4T3R14L’ ‐ internalized statistics about the transitional probabilities of letters, which are known to be represented in the left occipitotemporal visual word form system [ 6 ,7], might provide mutual support…”
Chen, S., Reichle, E. D., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101683 · Cited by 20
Is Developmental Dyslexia Due to a Visual and Not a Phonological Impairment?
Werth, R. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11101313 · Cited by 22
Sigurdardottir, H. M., Hjartarson, K. H., Gudmundsson, G. L., & Kristjansson, A. K. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.02.010 · Cited by 19
Doignon‐Camus, N., Seigneuric, A., Perrier, E., Sisti, A., & Zagar, D. (2012) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-012-0075-3 · Cited by 19
Busting a myth with the Bayes Factor
Schmalz, X., & Mulatti, C. (2017) · The Mental Lexicon · doi:10.1075/ml.17009.sch · Cited by 23
The SERIOL2 Model of Orthographic Processing.
Whitney, C., & Marton, Y. (2013) · Cited by 18
The Relation Between Alphabetic Basics, Word Recognition, and Reading
Adams, M. J. (2011) · International Reading Association eBooks · doi:10.1598/0829.01 · Cited by 18
“It barely registers scrambled or unpronounceable strings of letters, but it is highly responsive to words and also to well-spelled, pronounceable nonwords (Binder et al, 2006; Bruno et al, 2008; Kronbichler et al, 2007).”
BackgroundTemporal course of word recognition in skilled readers: A magnetoencephalography study
Simos, P. G., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, E., Frost, S. J., FLETCHER, J., Sarkari, S., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.038 · Cited by 18
Imaging of Cortical and White Matter Language Processing
Klein, A. P., Sabsevitz, D. S., Ulmer, J. L., & Mark, L. P. (2015) · Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI · doi:10.1053/j.sult.2015.05.011 · Cited by 17
Robust and Task-Independent Spatial Profile of the Visual Word Form Activation in Fusiform Cortex
Ma, L., Jiang, Y., Bai, J., Gong, Q., Liu, H., Chen, H.-C., He, S., & Weng, X. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026310 · Cited by 17
“, words or letter strings, see [10,11,12,13].”
Dien, J., & O’Hare, A. J. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.045 · Cited by 17
“The first is the visual word form area (VWFA), an area that has been implicated in orthographic analysis at the bigram level (Binder et al., 2006; Dehaene et al., 2005; Dien, in press(a,b); McCandliss et al., 2003).”
BackgroundHung, Y.-H., Frost, S. J., Molfese, P. J., Malins, J. G., Landi, N., Mencl, W. E., Rueckl, J. G., Bogaerts, L., & Pugh, K. R. (2018) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1451533 · Cited by 17
“…of these reading critical regions (e.g., the VWFA and IFG) are involved in statistical learning and sequence detection when linguistic stimuli are used (Binder et al. 2006; Frost et al., 2005; Fiez et al. 1999; Herbster et al. 1997; Graves et al., 2010; Mechelli et al. 2005; Vinckier et al. 2007).”
BackgroundIn cerebro unveiling unconscious mechanisms during reading
Lévy, J. (2010) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 17
Gould, L. A., Mickleborough, M., Ekstrand, C., Lorentz, E. J., & Borowsky, R. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1271135 · Cited by 20
Domain Generality and Specificity of Statistical Learning and its Relation with Reading Ability
Hung, Y.-H., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2018) · Literacy studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_2 · Cited by 16
Conant, L. L., Liebenthal, E., Desai, A., Seidenberg, M. S., & Binder, J. R. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107543 · Cited by 15
Self-citationfMRI of Language Systems: Methods and Applications
Binder, J. R. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0345-7_23 · Cited by 17
Self-citationVisual processing of words in a patient with visual form agnosia: A behavioural and fMRI study
Cavina‐Pratesi, C., Large, M., & Milner, A. D. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.017 · Cited by 16
“Previous research tells us that neurons in the VWFA are sensitive to knowledge of orthographic regularity derived from perceptual experience (Binder et al., 2006; Vinckier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPolspoel, B., Vandermosten, M., & Smedt, B. D. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107293 · Cited by 16
Cracking the neural code for word recognition in convolutional neural networks
Agrawal, A., & Dehaene, S. (2024) · PLoS Comput. Biol. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012430 · Cited by 11
Lévy, J., Peter Hagoort, A., & Démonet, J. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22589 · Cited by 13
Broken Symmetries in a Location-Invariant Word Recognition Network
Hannagan, T., Dandurand, F., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00064 · Cited by 15
“Interestingly it has been argued that because it supports the internal organization of the VWFA in a hierarchy of units of increasing complexity (Vinckier et al, 2007 ), this constraint could be sufficient to produce units that activate for specific open bigrams (Dehaene, Cohen, Sigman, & Vinckier, 2005 ), as observed…”
BackgroundA test of the role of the medial temporal lobe in single-word decoding
Osipowicz, K. Z., Rickards, T. A., Shah, A., Sharan, A. D., Sperling, M. R., Kahn, W., & Tracy, J. I. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.049 · Cited by 17
“(2005) demonstrated that within the left fusiform gyrus there may be important distinctions within the decoding network (see also: Deitz et al., 2005; Binder et al., 2005; Binder et al., 2006; Vinkier et al., 2007; Starrfelt & Gerlach, 2007).”
Boltzmann, M., Rüsseler, J., Ye, Z., & Münte, T. F. (2013) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/13.51.33 · Cited by 15
Probabilistic orthographic cues to grammatical category in the brain
Arciuli, J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2012) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.009 · Cited by 15
“Nor was any significant activity in either direction detected in the two left occipito-temporal ROIs adapted from Binder et al. (2006) and Vinckier et al. (2007), respectively, or in the left occipital ROI from Woollams et al. (2010) using SVC. Employing correction for multiple comparisons at the…”
InfluentialCulture is not destiny, for reading: highlighting variable routes to literacy within writing systems
Hirshorn, E. A., & Harris, L. N. (2022) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14768 · Cited by 13
Functional organization of the ventral occipitotemporal regions for Chinese orthographic processing
Tian, M., Li, H., Chu, M., & Ding, G. (2020) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100909 · Cited by 14
Dickson, D. S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.037 · Cited by 14
Implicit reading in Chinese pure alexia
Shan, C., Zhu, R., Xu, M., Luo, B., & Weng, X. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.05.006 · Cited by 14
The impact of inverted text on visual word processing: An fMRI study
Sussman, B. L., Reddigari, S., & Newman, S. D. (2018) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.004 · Cited by 15
Computational models of location-invariant orthographic processing
Dandurand, F., Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2013) · Connection Science · doi:10.1080/09540091.2013.801934 · Cited by 13
High-level Integrative Networks: A Resting-state fMRI Investigation of Reading and Spelling
Ellenblum, G., Purcell, J. J., Song, X., & Rapp, B. C. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01405 · Cited by 12
The beat goes on: the effect of rhythm on reading aloud
Gould, L. A., McKibben, T., Ekstrand, C., Lorentz, E. J., & Borowsky, R. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1089360 · Cited by 13
Demystifying visual word form area visual and nonvisual response properties with precision fMRI
Li, J., Hiersche, K., & Saygin, Z. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111481 · Cited by 19
“68,73 General lexical or visual semantics, interestingly, might be associated with an even more anterior cluster, 65 which we will discuss further below.”
Towards a universal neurobiological architecture for learning to read
Marcin Szwed, A., Vinckier, F., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000283 · Cited by 12
Evidence for rapid localist plasticity in the ventral visual stream: the example of words
Riesenhuber, M., & Glezer, L. S. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1210178 · Cited by 12
Rollans, C., & Cummine, J. (2018) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.009 · Cited by 12
Local response heterogeneity indexes experience-based neural differentiation in reading
Purcell, J. J., & Rapp, B. C. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.063 · Cited by 13
“Consistent with previous research identifying the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOTC) as a key site for orthographic representation in both reading and spelling (Dehaene et al., 2002; McCandliss et al., 2003; Binder et al., 2006; Gaillard et al., 2006; e.g., Baker et al., 2007; Rapp et al., 2015; Purcell et al…”
Featural and configural processing of faces and houses in matched dyslexic and typical readers
Jozranjbar, B., Kristjansson, A. K., & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108059 · Cited by 12
Wang, F., Kaneshiro, B., Toomarian, E. Y., Gosavi, R. S., Hasak, L. R., Moron, S., Nguyen, Q. T. H., Norcia, A. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2023) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13435 · Cited by 11
Yang, J., Wang, S., & Wu, T. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03528-x · Cited by 11
“The left supra-marginal gyrus is crucial for writing [53], and the left fusiform gyrus is required for visual word recognition [54].”
BackgroundDyslexia: Causes and Concomitant Impairments
Werth, R. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13030472 · Cited by 11
Perception of Ultra-Fast Speech by a Blind Listener - Does He Use His Visual System?
Moos, A., Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., Trouvain, J., & Ackermann, H. (2008) · Cited by 11
Working memory representation in atypical language dominance
Axmacher, N., Bialleck, K. A., Weber, B., Helmstaedter, C., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20645 · Cited by 13
“The activation of the inferior temporal cortex during verbal WM is likely due to the fact that concrete verbal stimuli, such as the ones used in our study, induce a more pronounced reactivation of objectrelated information; on the other hand, even sublexical sign strings have also been shown to elicit activity in infe…”
BackgroundZHANG, R., Zhenhu, W. A. N. G., Wang, X., & Yang, J. (2021) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00807 · Cited by 10
Lexical is as lexical does: computational approaches to lexical representation
Woollams, A. M. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1005637 · Cited by 10
Burgund, E. D., Guo, Y., & Aurbach, E. L. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1661-9 · Cited by 10
“lus demands, and is not dedicated to the processing of words per se (Binder et al. 2006; Joseph et al. 2003, 2006; Kronbichler et al. 2004; Mechelli et al. 2003; Price and Devlin 2003, 2004; Rogers et al. 2005; Starrfelt and Gerlach 2007; Xue et al. 2006).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Binder, Jeffrey R.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 739-748
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1634933
- OpenAlex
- W2070993882
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH51358, P01MH051358)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS033576, R01 NS33576)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00058, M01RR000058)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- fusiform gyrus, visual word recognition, bigrams, word superiority effect, letter perception, perceptual experience, English orthography, BOLD signal
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Educational Status, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review