Cited by 167Memory and Neural MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Hippocampal volume is as variable in young as in older adults: Implications for the notion of hippocampal atrophy in humans

Abstract

Previous studies in humans have shown the presence of an age-related reduction of hippocampal (HC) volume, as well as the presence of reduced HC volume in psychiatric populations suffering from schizophrenia, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. Altogether, these data suggested that aging or psychiatric disease can have neurotoxic effects on the hippocampus, and lead to HC atrophy. However, these two sets of findings imply that HC volume in young healthy adults should present less variability than HC volume in older adults and psychiatric populations. In the present study, we assessed HC volume in 177 healthy men and women aged from 18 to 85 years of age. We show that the dispersion around the mean of HC volume is not different in young and older adults, so that 25% of young healthy adults present HC volume as small as the average participants aged 60 to 75 years. This shows that HC volume is as variable in young as in older adults and suggests that smaller HC volume attributed to the aging process in previous studies could in fact represent HC volume determined early in life. We also report that within similar age groups, the percentage of difference in HC volume between the individuals with the smallest HC volume (smallest quartile) and the group average is greater than the percentage of difference reported to exist between psychiatric populations and normal control in recent meta-analyses. Taken together, these results confront the notion of hippocampal atrophy in humans and raise the possibility that pre-determined inter-individual differences in HC volume in humans may determine the vulnerability for age-related cognitive impairments or psychopathology throughout the lifetime.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 167

Metadata

Authors
Lupien, S. J., Evans, A., Lord, C., Miles, J., Pruessner, M., Pike, B., & Pruessner, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Lupien, S.J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
479-485
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041402469
Cited by
167
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
hippocampal volume, hippocampal atrophy, interindividual variability, aging, healthy adults, age-related cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Atrophy, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review