Cited by 246Reading and Literacy DevelopmentHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceLanguage Development and Disorders

Socioeconomic status predicts hemispheric specialisation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in young children

Open access
Raizada, Rajeev D.S., Richards, Todd L., Meltzoff, Andrew, Kuhl, Patricia K.·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Reading is a complex skill that is not mastered by all children. At the age of 5, on the cusp of prereading development, many factors combine to influence a child's future reading success, including neural and behavioural factors such as phonological awareness and the auditory processing of phonetic input, and environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES). We investigated the interactions between these factors in 5-year-old children by administering a battery of standardised cognitive and linguistic tests, measuring SES with a standardised scale, and using fMRI to record neural activity during a behavioral task, rhyming, that is predictive of reading skills. Correlation tests were performed, and then corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure. It emerged that only one relationship linking neural with behavioural or environmental factors survived as significant after FDR correction: a correlation between SES and the degree of hemispheric specialisation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a region which includes Broca's area. This neural-environmental link remained significant even after controlling for the children's scores on the standardised language and cognition tests. In order to investigate possible environmental influences on the left IFG further, grey and white matter volumes were calculated. Marginally significant correlations with SES were found, indicating that environmental effects may manifest themselves in the brain anatomically as well as functionally. Collectively, these findings suggest that the weaker language skills of low-SES children are related to reduced underlying neural specialisation, and that these neural problems go beyond what is revealed by behavioural tests alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent evidence suggests that the interaction between SES and biological variables (e.g. side of hemispheric injury, genomics, neural imaging) may contribute to the relationship between SES and cognition.

    “While the association of SES with cognition has been well studied, recent evidence suggests that the interaction between SES and biological variables (e.g. side of hemispheric injury, genomics, neural imaging) may contribute to this relationship (Cohen-Zimerman et al., 2019; Noble et al., 2012; Raizada et al., 2008; Schneider et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024).”
  • Children exposed to neglect and poverty often have language deficits and accompanying differences in neural function supporting language.

    “children exposed to neglect and poverty often have deficits in language abilities (Farah et al., 2006; Hildyard and Wolfe, 2002) and accompanying differences in neural function supporting language function (Raizada, Richards, Meltzoff, & Kuhl, 2008).”

    From Childhood adversity and neural development: Deprivation and threat as distinct dimensions of early experience (2014) · cites this paper as Raizada, Richards, Meltzoff, & Kuhl, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 246

Authors
Raizada, R. D. S., Richards, T. L., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Raizada, Rajeev D.S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1392-1401
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047373182
Cited by
246
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
16.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P30DC04661, P30DC004661)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000166)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD002274)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
socioeconomic status, hemispheric specialisation, left inferior frontal gyrus, Broca's area, reading development, young children, rhyme, phonological awareness, gray matter volume, white matter volume, language skills
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Child, Preschool, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Social Class, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review