The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL
Abstract
Typically in neuroimaging we are looking to extract some pertinent information from imperfect, noisy images of the brain. This might be the inference of percent changes in blood flow in perfusion FMRI data, segmentation of subcortical structures from structural MRI, or inference of the probability of an anatomical connection between an area of cortex and a subthalamic nucleus using diffusion MRI. In this article we will describe how Bayesian techniques have made a significant impact in tackling problems such as these, particularly in regards to the analysis tools in the FMRIB Software Library (FSL). We shall see how Bayes provides a framework within which we can attempt to infer on models of neuroimaging data, while allowing us to incorporate our prior belief about the brain and the neuroimaging equipment in the form of biophysically informed or regularising priors. It allows us to extract probabilistic information from the data, and to probabilistically combine information from multiple modalities. Bayes can also be used to not only compare and select between models of different complexity, but also to infer on data using committees of models. Finally, we mention some analysis scenarios where Bayesian methods are impractical, and briefly discuss some practical approaches that we have taken in these cases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The activation map of the group mean of the parametric contrast was cluster corrected at a voxel threshold of z>4.5 and cluster probability of P<0.001 (Woolrich et al, 2009).”
From Lisdexamfetamine Effects on Executive Activation and Neurochemistry in Menopausal Women with Executive Function Difficulties (2017) · cites this paper as Woolrich et al, 2009
In the citing paper
“Although the parametric activation map used to identify ROIs was corrected for multiple comparisons using Gaussian Random Field Theory (Woolrich et al, 2009), we did not further correct for the number of ROIs examined and P-values reported are uncorrected.”
From Lisdexamfetamine Effects on Executive Activation and Neurochemistry in Menopausal Women with Executive Function Difficulties (2017) · cites this paper as Woolrich et al, 2009
Citations
Cites
Robust group analysis using outlier inference
Woolrich, M. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.042 · Cited by 504 · cited 4×
“the false positive rate validity, the approach is less sensitive when compared with the MOG outlier approach (Woolrich, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn exploration of aspects of Bayesian multiple testing
Scott, J. G., & Berger, J. O. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2005.08.031 · Cited by 330
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Attias, 2000, A Variational Bayesian framework for graphical models, Adv. Neur. Info. Proc. Sys., 12
- Bartsch, 2006, Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 23, 921, 10.1002/jmri.20579 · DOI
- Beckmann, 2005, Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis, Neuroimage, 25, 294, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.043 · DOI
- Beckmann, 2004, Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 23, 137, 10.1109/TMI.2003.822821 · DOI
- Behrens, 2003, Characterisation and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion weighted MR imaging, Magn. Reson. Med., 50, 1077, 10.1002/mrm.10609 · DOI · Paper page
- Behrens, 2007, Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain?, Neuroimage, 34, 144, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Chappell, M., Grove, A., Whitcher, B., and Woolrich, M. (2008). Variational Bayesian inference for a non-linear forward model. IEEE Sig Proc. In Submission.
- Cox, 1946, Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation, Am. J. Phys., 14, 1, 10.1119/1.1990764 · DOI
- Friston, 2007, Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation, Neuroimage, 34, 220, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035 · DOI · Paper page
- Green, 1995, Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika, 82, 711, 10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · DOI
- Jbabdi, 2007, A Bayesian framework for global tractography, Neuroimage, 37, 116, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.039 · DOI
- Jenkinson, 2003, A fast, automated, n-dimensional phase unwrapping algorithm, Magn. Reson. Med., 49, 193, 10.1002/mrm.10354 · DOI
- Jenkinson, 2001, A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images, Med. Image Anal., 5, 143, 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6 · DOI
- Makni, 2008, Bayesian deconvolution of fMRI data using bilinear dynamical system, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.052 · DOI
- Makni, S., Beckmann, C., Smith, S., and Woolrich, M. (2008b). Combining ICA and GLM for fMRI data analysis. In Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain.
- Patenaude, B., Smith, S., Kennedy, D., and Jenkinson, M. (2007). FIRST — FMRIB's integrated registration and segmentation tool. In Thirteenth Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain.
- Penny, 2003, Variational Bayesian inference for fMRI time series, NeuroImage, 19, 1477, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00071-5 · DOI
- Penny, 2004, Comparing dynamic causal models, Neuroimage, 22, 1157, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 2002, Fast robust automated brain extraction, Hum. Brain Mapp., 17, 143, 10.1002/hbm.10062 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 2006, Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data, Neuroimage, 31, 1487, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 · DOI
- Woolrich, 2006, Variational bayes inference of spatial mixture models for segmentation, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 25, 1380, 10.1109/TMI.2006.880682 · DOI
- Woolrich, 2004, Multi-level linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference, NeuroImage, 21, 1732, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023 · DOI
- Woolrich, 2004, Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes, NeuroImage, 21, 1748, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.024 · DOI
- Woolrich, 2005, Mixture models with adaptive spatial regularisation for segmentation with an application to FMRI data, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 24, 1, 10.1109/TMI.2004.836545 · DOI
- Woolrich, 2006, Bayesian inference of haemodynamic changes in functional ASL data, Magn. Reson. Med., 56, 891, 10.1002/mrm.21039 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Reveley, C., Ye, F. Q., & Leopold, D. A. (2024) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00368 · Cited by 14
A distributed subcortical circuit linked to instrumental information-seeking about threat
Trier, H. A., Khalighinejad, N., Hamilton, S., Harbison, C., Priestley, L., Laubach, M., Klein-Flügge, M., Scholl, J., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2410955121 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Woolrich, M. W., Jbabdi, S., Patenaude, B., Chappell, M., Makni, S., Behrens, T., Beckmann, C., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- S173-S186
- ISSN
- 1053-8119
- Cited by
- 2,385
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review