Cited by 47Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

An intrinsic diffusion response function for analyzing diffusion functional MRI time series

Aso, Toshihiko, Urayama, Shin-ichi, Poupon, Cyril, Sawamoto, Nobukatsu, Fukuyama, Hidenao, Bihan, Denis Le·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

To disentangle the temporal profiles of the diffusion and BOLD components of diffusion-weighted functional MRI (DfMRI) during visual activation, we extracted the raw signal from an anatomically defined volume of interest encompassing the visual cortex of 16 subjects. Under the assumption of a linear, time invariant system we were able to define an intrinsic diffusion response function (DRF) from neural tissue, as a counterpart to the hemodynamic response function (HRF) commonly used in BOLD-fMRI. The shape of the DRF response was found to be very similar to the time courses of optical imaging transmittance signals, thought to originate from local geometric changes in brain tissue at the microscopic scale. The overall DfMRI signal response was modeled as the convolution of the stimulation paradigm time course with a DhRF, which is the sum of the DRF and a fractional HRF resulting from residual tissue T2-BOLD contrast. The contribution of the HRF to the DfMRI signal was found to be 26% at peak amplitude, but the DRF component which has a much steeper onset contributed solely at beginning of the response onset. The suitability of this model over the canonical HRF to process DfMRI data was then demonstrated on datasets acquired in 5 other subjects using a rapid event-related design. Some non-linearities in the responses were observed, mainly after the end of the stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T2-weighted spin-echo diffusion MRI retains residual vascular effects related to BOLD.

    “T2-weighted spin-echo diffusion MRI retains residual vascular effects related to BOLD (Aso et al., 2009; de Riedmatten, Spencer, Olszowy, et al., 2025; Kershaw et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2007).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Aso et al., 2009

  • T2-related effects are largely independent of b-value, so that, when echo time is matched, their contributions can be substantially reduced or eliminated by calculating an ADC or sADC derived from two b-values.

    “T2-related effects (which are weaker than T2*-weighted BOLD) are largely independent of b-value, so that, when echo time is matched, their contributions can be substantially reduced or eliminated by calculating an ADC or, better, sADC derived from two b-values (Aso et al., 2009; de Riedmatten, Spencer, Olszowy, et al., 2025; Le Bihan et al., 2006; Spencer et al., 2025).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Aso et al., 2009

  • Once confounds are carefully controlled, an intrinsic diffusion response function should be used in place of the canonical hemodynamic response function used in BOLD fMRI.

    “Once these confounds are carefully controlled, an intrinsic diffusion response function should be used in place of the canonical hemodynamic response function used in BOLD fMRI (Aso et al., 2009).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Aso et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aso, T., Urayama, S.-I., Poupon, C., Sawamoto, N., Fukuyama, H., & Bihan, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Corresponding author
Aso, Toshihiko
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1487-1495
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994857646
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21613004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
hemodynamic response function, visual cortex activation, BOLD signal, visual stimulation, linear time-invariant systems, event-related design
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Visual Cortex, Reproducibility of Results, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review