The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient correction of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion in Echo Planar Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Single-shot Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) is one of the most efficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition schemes, producing relatively high-definition images in 100 ms or less. These qualities make it desirable for Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), functional MRI (fMRI), and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI (DSC-MRI). However, EPI suffers from severe spatial and intensity distortion due to B0 field inhomogeneity induced by magnetic susceptibility variations. Anatomically accurate, undistorted images are essential for relating DTI and fMRI images with anatomical MRI scans, and for spatial registration with other modalities. We present here a fast, robust, and accurate procedure for correcting EPI images from such spatial and intensity distortions. The method involves acquisition of scans with opposite phase encoding polarities, resulting in opposite spatial distortion patterns, and alignment of the resulting images using a fast nonlinear registration procedure. We show that this method, requiring minimal additional scan time, provides superior accuracy relative to the more commonly used, and more time consuming, field mapping approach. This method is also highly computationally efficient, allowing for direct ‘real-time’ implementation on the MRI scanner. We further demonstrate that the proposed method can be used to recover dropouts in gradient echo (BOLD and DSC-MRI) EPI images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347
Cited by
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005 · Cited by 1,216
SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049 · Cited by 752
Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal
Caballero-Gaudes, C., & Reynolds, R. C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018 · Cited by 542
Neuroanatomical Assessment of Biological Maturity
Brown, T. T., Kuperman, J. M., Chung, Y., Erhart, M., McCabe, C., Hagler, D. J., Venkatraman, V. K., Akshoomoff, N., Amaral, D. G., Bloss, C. S., et al. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.002 · Cited by 332
Self-citationSocioeconomic status, white matter, and executive function in children
Ursache, A., Noble, K. G., & the Pediatric Imaging, N. A. G. S. (2016) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.531 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, D., Kuperman, J. M., & Dale, A. M.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-183
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046696576
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.