The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI
Open accessAbstract
Exact timing is essential for functional MRI data analysis. Datasets are commonly measured using repeated 2D imaging methods, resulting in a temporal offset between slices. To compensate for this timing difference, slice-timing correction (i.e. temporal data interpolation) has been used as an fMRI pre-processing step for more than fifteen years. However, there has been an ongoing debate about the effectiveness and applicability of this method. This paper presents the first elaborated analysis of the impact of the slice-timing effect on simulated data for different fMRI paradigms and measurement parameters, taking into account data noise and smoothing effects. Here we show, depending on repetition time and paradigm design, slice-timing effects can significantly impair fMRI results and slice-timing correction methods can successfully compensate for these effects and therefore increase the robustness of the data analysis. In addition, our results from simulated data were supported by empirical in vivo datasets. Our findings suggest that slice-timing correction should be included in the fMRI pre-processing pipeline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
fMRIPrep: A robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI
Esteban, O., Markiewicz, C. J., Blair, R. W., Moodie, C. A., Isik, A. I., Erramuzpe, A., Kent, J. D., Goncalves, M., DuPre, E., Snyder, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 · Cited by 3,905
The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion
Li, X., Morgan, P. S., Ashburner, J., Smith, J., & Rorden, C. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001 · Cited by 1,073
Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal
Caballero-Gaudes, C., & Reynolds, R. C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018 · Cited by 542
Morales, J., Lau, H., & Fleming, S. M. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2360-17.2018 · Cited by 274
Tik, M., Hoffmann, A., Sladky, R., Tomova, L., Hummer, A., Navarro de Lara, L., Bukowski, H., Pripfl, J., Biswal, B., Lamm, C., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.022 · Cited by 245
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sladky, R., Friston, K. J., Tröstl, J., Cunnington, R., Moser, E., & Windischberger, C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 588-594
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051222601
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078
- The paper
- Sladky, R., Friston, K. J., Tröstl, J., Cunnington, R., Moser, E., & Windischberger, C. (2011). Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.