Cited by 1,073Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion

Open access
Li, Xiangrui, Morgan, Paul S., Ashburner, John, Smith, Jolinda, Rorden, Christopher·2016·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Background Clinical imaging data are typically stored and transferred in the DICOM format, whereas the NIfTI format has been widely adopted by scientists in the neuroimaging community. Therefore, a vital initial step in processing the data is to convert images from the complicated DICOM format to the much simpler NIfTI format. While there are a number of tools that usually handle DICOM to NIfTI conversion seamlessly, some variations can disrupt this process.New method We provide some insight into the challenges faced with image conversion. First, different manufacturers implement the DICOM format differently which complicates the conversion. Second, different modalities and sub-modalities may need special treatment during conversion. Lastly, the image transferring and archiving can also impact the DICOM conversion.Results We present results in several error-prone domains, including the slice order for functional imaging, phase encoding direction for distortion correction, effect of diffusion gradient direction, and effect of gantry correction for some imaging modality.Comparison with existing methods Conversion tools are often designed for a specific manufacturer or modality. The tools and insight we present here are aimed at different manufacturers or modalities.Conclusions The imaging conversion is complicated by the variation of images. An understanding of the conversion basics can be helpful for identifying the source of the error. Here we provide users with simple methods for detecting and correcting problems. This also serves as an overview for developers who wish to either develop their own tools or adapt the open source tools created by the authors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Source data files were converted to NifTI format using dcm2niix and organized and named following the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS).

    “To provide a single standard format, the sources data files were converted to NifTI format files using the dcm2niix 54 conversion program and are organized and named following the Brain Imaging Data Structure 55 (BIDS).”
  • Converting DICOM to NIfTI files eliminates all patient-identifiable metadata from the header portion of the DICOM format.

    “The conversion of DICOM to NIfTI files has the benefit of eliminating all patient-identifiable metadata from the header portion of the DICOM format80,81.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Descamps B, Roggeman C, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Image Acquisition Order and Input Order of BOLD- fMRI Data for Slice Time Correction in fMRI Data Processing Tools. Abstract presented at First Benelux In Vivo MR Methods Symposium.2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, X., Morgan, P. S., Ashburner, J., Smith, J., & Rorden, C.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
264
Pages
47-56
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290321704
Cited by
1,073
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 174 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (091593)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neuroimaging data processing, image format conversion, phase-encoding direction, distortion correction, image archiving
MeSH terms
Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neuroimaging, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review