Cited by 36Barrier Structure and Function StudiesGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Analysis of a simulation algorithm for direct brain drug delivery

Open access
Rosenbluth, Kathryn Hammond, Eschermann, Jan Felix, Mittermeyer, Gabriele, Thomson, Rowena, Mittermeyer, Stephan, Bankiewicz, Krystof S.·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

Convection enhanced delivery (CED) achieves targeted delivery of drugs with a pressure-driven infusion through a cannula placed stereotactically in the brain. This technique bypasses the blood brain barrier and gives precise distributions of drugs, minimizing off-target effects of compounds such as viral vectors for gene therapy or toxic chemotherapy agents. The exact distribution is affected by the cannula positioning, flow rate and underlying tissue structure. This study presents an analysis of a simulation algorithm for predicting the distribution using baseline MRI images acquired prior to inserting the cannula. The MRI images included diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to estimate the tissue properties. The algorithm was adapted for the devices and protocols identified for upcoming trials and validated with direct MRI visualization of gadoinium in 20 infusions in non-human primates. We found strong agreement between the size and location of the simulated and gadolinium volumes, demonstrating the clinical utility of this surgical planning algorithm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.107

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Convection-enhanced delivery increases the vector volume that can be delivered to the target site and enhances cell transduction in the targeted CNS substructure.

    “This has the advantage of increased vector volume that can be delivered to the target site, which enhances cell transduction in the targeted CNS substructure”

    From AAVrh.10-Mediated APOE2 Central Nervous System Gene Therapy for APOE4-Associated Alzheimer's Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction describes CED as a means of distributing viral vectors to brain targets, and Methods §2.1 reports vector co-infusions of 30–300 μL. The paper does not show that CED increases the volume of vector that can be delivered relative to another method or that a larger volume enhances cell transduction in the targeted CNS structure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fiandaca MS Varenika V 2009 Real-time MR imaging of adeno-associated viral vector delivery to the primate brain Neuroimage 47 Suppl 2 T27 35 19095069 PMC2730220

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenbluth, K. H., Eschermann, J. F., Mittermeyer, G., Thomson, R., Mittermeyer, S., & Bankiewicz, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Brainlab (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Rosenbluth, Kathryn Hammond
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
2423-2429
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034095106
Cited by
36
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01CA118816)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
convection-enhanced delivery, simulation algorithms, diffusion tensor imaging, tissue anisotropy, surgical planning, gadolinium-enhanced MRI, non-human primates, blood-brain barrier bypass, gene therapy vectors, chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Catheterization, Computer Simulation, Contrast Media, Gadolinium, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Injections, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pressure, Stereotaxic Techniques, Reproducibility of Results, Drug Delivery Systems, Gene Transfer Techniques, Convection, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review