Imitation components in the human brain: An fMRI study
Open accessAbstract
Human ability to imitate movements is instantiated in parietal, premotor and opercular structures, often referred to as the human homologue of the macaque mirror neuron system. As most studies employed imitation of specular models (participants imitated the seen movement as their mirror reflection), it is unclear whether the structures implicated code for the anatomical compatibility between the performer and the model or the spatial compatibility between the location at which both movements occur. We used fMRI to disentangle the neural mechanisms underlying anatomical and spatial components of imitation. Participants moved one finger which was either spatially or anatomically compatible with the finger moved in a video-display. In keeping with the existent behavioral literature, we found that during the spatial task, participants' responses were faster when the seen movement was also anatomically compatible, whereas in the anatomical task, responses were faster when the seen movement was also spatially compatible. Critically, the activity of the parietal opercula bilaterally was associated with the anatomical compatibility effect. Furthermore, increased activity of the left middle frontal gyrus and right superior temporal sulcus (extending to the temporo-parietal junction) was found in those trials in which the spatial mapping between the seen and executed movements was detrimental for the anatomical task. Our findings extend current understanding of the role played by spati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of studies showed engagement of regions associated with the MD network, including dorsal frontoparietal cortex, supplementary motor area, and anterior insula, during imitation control.
“In addition, a number of studies showed engagement of regions associated with the MD network, including dorsal frontoparietal cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA) and anterior insula (Marsh, Bird, & Catmur, 2016;Cross & Iacoboni, 2013;Mengotti, Corradi-Dell'Acqua, & Rumiati, 2012;Crescentini, Mengotti, Grecucci, & Rumiati, 2011;Bien, Roebroeck, Goebel, & Sack, 2009).”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Mengotti, Corradi-Dell'Acqua, & Rumiati, 2012
Cites
Perception and Action Planning
Prinz, W. (1997) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/713752551 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816 · see citing works
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1225 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1996) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.321 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01261 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“In addition, a number of studies showed engagement of regions associated with the MD network including dorsal frontoparietal cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA) and anterior insula (Bien, Roebroeck, Goebel, & Sack, 2009; Crescentini, Mengotti, Grecucci, & Rumiati, 2011; Cross & Iacoboni, 2013; Marsh, Bird, & Catmur…”
BackgroundThe inhibition of automatic imitation: a meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies
Darda, K. M., & Ramsey, R. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/334938
“, 2009), whereas others show engagement of the MD network (Bien et al., 2009; Crescentini et al., 2011; Cross and Iacoboni, 2013; Mengotti et al., 2012; Marsh et al., 2016).”
- Authors
- Mengotti, P., Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., & Rumiati, R. I.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mengotti, Paola
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1622-1630
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049314799
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SDL (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Friuli–Venezia-Giulia Government
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- imitation, mirror neuron system, spatial compatibility, premotor cortex, mirror movements, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, middle frontal gyrus, motor mapping
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review