The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
The high-dimensional pattern classification methods, e.g., support vector machines (SVM), have been widely investigated for analysis of structural and functional brain images (such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) to assist the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) including its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Most existing classification methods extract features from neuroimaging data and then construct a single classifier to perform classification. However, due to noise and small sample size of neuroimaging data, it is challenging to train only a global classifier that can be robust enough to achieve good classification performance. In this paper, instead of building a single global classifier, we propose a local patch-based subspace ensemble method which builds multiple individual classifiers based on different subsets of local patches and then combines them for more accurate and robust classification. Specifically, to capture the local spatial consistency, each brain image is partitioned into a number of local patches and a subset of patches is randomly selected from the patch pool to build a weak classifier. Here, the sparse representation-based classification (SRC) method, which has shown effective for classification of image data (e.g., face), is used to construct each weak classifier. Then, multiple weak classifiers are combined to make the final decision. We evaluate our method on 652 subjects (including 198 AD patients, 225 MCI and 229 normal controls) from Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database using MR images. The experimental results show that our method achieves an accuracy of 90.8% and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 94.86% for AD classification and an accuracy of 87.85% and an AUC of 92.90% for MCI classification, respectively, demonstrating a very promising performance of our method compared with the state-of-the-art methods for AD/MCI classification using MR images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
(2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,370
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Ferrari, V. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,122
Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation
Wright, J., Yang, A. Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.79 · Cited by 9,388
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
Ho, T. K. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.709601 · Cited by 6,842
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (2001) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450037906x · Cited by 5,085
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347
Cited by
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968
“To tackle these limitations, recently, Liu et al. proposed a patch-basedmethod that first dissected brain areas into small 3D patches, extracted features from each selected patch individually, and then combined the features hierarchically in a classifier level (Liu et al., 2012, 2013).”
InfluentialSelf-citationA Review of Feature Reduction Techniques in Neuroimaging
Mwangi, B., Tian, T. S., & Soares, J. C. (2014) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9204-3 · Cited by 559
Liu, M., Li, F., Yan, H., Wang, K., Ma, Y., Shen, L., & Xu, M. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459 · Cited by 568
Self-citationShi, J., Zheng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., & Ying, S. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2655720 · Cited by 444
Dual attention multi-instance deep learning for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis with structural MRI
Zhu, W., Sun, L., Huang, J., Han, L., & Zhang, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3077079 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, M., Zhang, D., & Shen, D.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1106-1116
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054540100
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.055
- The paper
- Liu, M., Zhang, D., & Shen, D. (2012). Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.