Cited by 444Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Multimodal neuroimaging feature learning with multimodal stacked deep polynomial networks for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

Shi, Jun, Zheng, Xiao, Li, Yan, Zhang, Qi, Ying, Shihui·2018·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its early stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment, is essential for timely treatment and possible delay of AD. Fusion of multimodal neuroimaging data, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), has shown its effectiveness for AD diagnosis. The deep polynomial networks (DPN) is a recently proposed deep learning algorithm, which performs well on both large-scale and small-size datasets. In this study, a multimodal stacked DPN (MM-SDPN) algorithm, which MM-SDPN consists of two-stage SDPNs, is proposed to fuse and learn feature representation from multimodal neuroimaging data for AD diagnosis. Specifically speaking, two SDPNs are first used to learn high-level features of MRI and PET, respectively, which are then fed to another SDPN to fuse multimodal neuroimaging information. The proposed MM-SDPN algorithm is applied to the ADNI dataset to conduct both binary classification and multiclass classification tasks. Experimental results indicate that MM-SDPN is superior over the state-of-the-art multimodal feature-learning-based algorithms for AD diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2017.2655720

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, J., Zheng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., & Ying, S.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2018-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
173-183
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2574038793
Cited by
444
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 9
FWCI
36.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471231, 81627804, 61401267, U1201256, 61471245, 11471208)
  • Projects of Guangdong R/D Foundation and the Fundamental Science Projects of Shenzhen City (JCYJ20140418091413514, ZDSYS20140508141148477, JCYJ20160308095019383)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, mild cognitive impairment, multimodal neuroimaging, magnetic resonance imaging, PET, multimodal fusion, representation learning, ADNI dataset, binary classification, multi-class classification
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Neuroimaging, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review