The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-source feature learning for joint analysis of incomplete multiple heterogeneous neuroimaging data
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of incomplete data is a big challenge when integrating large-scale brain imaging datasets from different imaging modalities. In the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), for example, over half of the subjects lack cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements; an independent half of the subjects do not have fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans; many lack proteomics measurements. Traditionally, subjects with missing measures are discarded, resulting in a severe loss of available information. In this paper, we address this problem by proposing an incomplete Multi-Source Feature (iMSF) learning method where all the samples (with at least one available data source) can be used. To illustrate the proposed approach, we classify patients from the ADNI study into groups with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and normal controls, based on the multi-modality data. At baseline, ADNI’s 780 participants (172 AD, 397 MCI, 211 NC), have at least one of four data types: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), FDG-PET, CSF and proteomics. These data are used to test our algorithm. Depending on the problem being solved, we divide our samples according to the availability of data sources, and we learn shared sets of features with state-of-the-art sparse learning methods. To build a practical and robust system, we construct a classifier ensemble by combining our method with four other methods for missing value estimation. Comprehensive experiments with various parameters show that our proposed iMSF method and the ensemble model yield stable and promising results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347
Linked independent component analysis for multimodal data fusion
Groves, A. R., Beckmann, C. F., Smith, S. M., & Woolrich, M. W. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.073 · Cited by 319
Structural MRI biomarkers for preclinical and mild Alzheimer's disease
Fennema‐Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., McEvoy, L. K., Fleisher, A. S., Wu, E. H., Karow, D. S., & Dale, A. M. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20744 · Cited by 233
Boosting power for clinical trials using classifiers based on multiple biomarkers
Kohannim, O., Hua, X., Hibar, D. P., Lee, S., Chou, Y.-Y., Toga, A. W., Jack, C. R., Weiner, M. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2010) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.022 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Cited by
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968
“…modalities helps enhance the diagnostic accuracy (Cui et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2007a; Hinrichs et al., 2011; Kohannim et al., 2010; Perrin et al., 2009; Suk and Shen, 2013;Walhovd et al., 2010;Wee et al., 2012; Westman et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2012; Zhang and Shen, 2012; Zhang et al., 2011).”
Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review
Kline, A., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dennis, S., Hutch, M., Xu, Z., Wang, F., Cheng, F., & Luo, Y. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00712-8 · Cited by 528
Latent feature representation with stacked auto-encoder for AD/MCI diagnosis
Initiative, T. A. D. N., Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-013-0687-3 · Cited by 526
Islam, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-018-0080-3 · Cited by 478
Deep Learning Based Imaging Data Completion for Improved Brain Disease Diagnosis
Li, R., Zhang, W., Suk, H.-I., Wang, L., Li, J., Shen, D., & Ji, S. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10443-0_39 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, L., Wang, Y., Thompson, P. M., Narayan, V. A., & Ye, J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 622-632
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095377654
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-source feature learning for joint analysis of incomplete multiple heterogeneous neuroimaging data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.059
- The paper
- Yuan, L., Wang, Y., Thompson, P. M., Narayan, V. A., & Ye, J. (2012). Multi-source feature learning for joint analysis of incomplete multiple heterogeneous neuroimaging data. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.