Cited by 190Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Boosting power for clinical trials using classifiers based on multiple biomarkers

Open access
Kohannim, Omid, Hua, Xue, Hibar, Derrek P., Lee, Suh, Chou, Yi-Yu, Toga, Arthur W., Jack, Clifford R., Weiner, Michael W. +1 more·2010·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Machine learning methods pool diverse information to perform computer-assisted diagnosis and predict future clinical decline. We introduce a machine learning method to boost power in clinical trials. We created a Support Vector Machine algorithm that combines brain imaging and other biomarkers to classify 737 Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) subjects as having Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or normal controls. We trained our classifiers based on example data including: MRI measures of hippocampal, ventricular, and temporal lobe volumes, a PET-FDG numerical summary, CSF biomarkers (t-tau, p-tau, and Abeta(42)), ApoE genotype, age, sex, and body mass index. MRI measures contributed most to Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification; PET-FDG and CSF biomarkers, particularly Abeta(42), contributed more to MCI classification. Using all biomarkers jointly, we used our classifier to select the one-third of the subjects most likely to decline. In this subsample, fewer than 40 AD and MCI subjects would be needed to detect a 25% slowing in temporal lobe atrophy rates with 80% power--a substantial boosting of power relative to standard imaging measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.022

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kohannim et al. (2010) demonstrated that combining MRI, FDG-PET, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers yielded 5-10% accuracy gains over MRI alone.

    “Kohannim et al. (2010) demonstrated that combining MRI, FDG-PET, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers yielded 5–10% accuracy gains over MRI alone”

    From Multimodal neuroimaging and AI integration in cognitive disorders: advances, challenges, and future directions for precision medicine (2026) · cites this paper as Kohannim et al., 2010

    Results §3.2 reports higher training-set leave-one-out accuracy when both FDG-PET and CSF biomarkers were added: 11.6% for AD versus controls and 4.6% for MCI versus controls. Those gains are not the stated 5–10%, and the baseline classifier included ApoE and age as well as MRI. The section also says the improvement in independent-test ROC AUC was not statistically significant (page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alzheimer’s Association Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures Alzheimer’s and Dementia 2009 5 3 234 70 19426951
  2. Carlsson CM Gleason CE Puglielli L Asthana S Halter JB Ouslander JG Tinetti ME Studenski S High KP Asthana S Chapter 65. Dementia Including Alzheimer’s Disease Hazzard’s Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 2009 6e The McGraw-Hill Companies URL: http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=5122625
  3. Cummings JL Doody R Clark C Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease: challenges to early intervention Neurology 2007 69 16 1622 34 17938373
  4. Freund Y Schapire RE A Short Introduction to Boosting Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 1999 14 5 771 780
  5. Ho AJ Stein JL Hua X Lee S Hibar DP Leow AD Dinov ID Toga AW Saykin AJ Shen L Foroud T Pankratz N Huentelman MJ Craig DW Gerber JD Allen A Corneveaux J Stephan DA Webster J DeChairo BM Potkin SG Jack CR Weiner MW Raji CA Lopez OL Becker JT Thompson PM Commonly carried allele within FTO, an obesity-associated gene, relates to accelerated brain degeneration in the elderly Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010a in press PMC2889537 20404173
  6. Ho AJ Raji CA Becker JT Lopez OL Kuller LH Hua X Lee S Hibar D Dinov ID Stein JL Jack CR Weiner MW Toga AW Thompson PM Obesity and brain structure in 700 MCI and AD patients Neurobiology of Aging 2010b in press PMC3197833 20570405
  7. Stein JL Hua X Morra JH Lee S Hibar DP Ho AJ Leow AD Toga AW Sul JH Kang H Eskin E Saykin AJ Shen L Foroud T Pankratz N Huentelman MJ Craig DW Gerber JD Allen AN Corneveaux JJ Stephan DA Webster J DeChairo BM Potkin SG Jack CR Jr. Weiner MW Thompson PM Genome-wide association study of temporal lobe structure identifies novel quantitative trait loci for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease NeuroImage 2010 in press PMC2856746 20197096
  8. Zhang H Wu T Bae M Reiman EM Alexander GE Jack CR Jr. Thompson PM Chen K Use Of The Support Vector Machine And Sensitivity Of an AD-related Region-of-interest Gray Matter Classifier In Identifying Amnestic MCI Subjects Who Convert To AD: Preliminary Findings From The AD Neuroimaging Initiative 26-31 July Presented at The International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease Chicago 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohannim, O., Hua, X., Hibar, D. P., Lee, S., Chou, Y.-Y., Toga, A. W., Jack, C. R., Weiner, M. W., & Thompson, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Paul M.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1429-1442
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167638846
Cited by
190
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  • Pfizer
  • Merck
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Medpace
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, P30AG010129, K01AG030514, U19AG010483)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, support vector machine, combined biomarker detection, brain MRI, FDG-PET, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta 42, APOE genotype, temporal lobe atrophy, computer-aided diagnosis, ADNI
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Artificial Intelligence, Cognition Disorders, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Biomarkers, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review