The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NIRS in clinical neurology — a ‘promising’ tool?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858 · cited 6×
“Its extremely wide use in in- and outpatient settings additionally builds on the fact that for decades it was the one technique available, although the clinical Please cite this article as: Obrig, H., NIRS in clinical neurology — a j.neuroimage.2013.03.045 validity as a routine-check for functional abnormalities of th…”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation
Chaudhary, U., Birbaumer, N., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113 · Cited by 928
Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: introduction for the special issue
Boas, D. A., Elwell, C. E., Ferrari, M., & Taga, G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.033 · Cited by 561
Herold, F., Wiegel, P., Scholkmann, F., & Müller, N. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm7120466 · Cited by 482
Chen, W.-L., Wagner, J., Heugel, N., Sugar, J., Lee, Y.-W., Conant, L., Malloy, M., Heffernan, J., Quirk, B., Zinos, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00724 · Cited by 382
Brain–computer interface–based communication in the completely locked-in State
Chaudhary, U., Xia, B., Silvoni, S., Cohen, L. G., & Birbaumer, N. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002593 · Cited by 235
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Obrig, H.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 535-546
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041829367
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NIRS in clinical neurology — a ‘promising’ tool? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.045
- The paper
- Obrig, H. (2014). NIRS in clinical neurology — a ‘promising’ tool? NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
