Cited by 235EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Brain–computer interface–based communication in the completely locked-in State

Open access
Chaudhary, Ujwal, Xia, Bin, Silvoni, Stefano, Cohen, Leonardo G., Birbaumer, Niels·2017·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Despite partial success, communication has remained impossible for persons suffering from complete motor paralysis but intact cognitive and emotional processing, a state called complete locked-in state (CLIS). Based on a motor learning theoretical context and on the failure of neuroelectric brain-computer interface (BCI) communication attempts in CLIS, we here report BCI communication using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and an implicit attentional processing procedure. Four patients suffering from advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-two of them in permanent CLIS and two entering the CLIS without reliable means of communication-learned to answer personal questions with known answers and open questions all requiring a "yes" or "no" thought using frontocentral oxygenation changes measured with fNIRS. Three patients completed more than 46 sessions spread over several weeks, and one patient (patient W) completed 20 sessions. Online fNIRS classification of personal questions with known answers and open questions using linear support vector machine (SVM) resulted in an above-chance-level correct response rate over 70%. Electroencephalographic oscillations and electrooculographic signals did not exceed the chance-level threshold for correct communication despite occasional differences between the physiological signals representing a "yes" or "no" response. However, electroencephalogram (EEG) changes in the theta-frequency band correlated with inferior communication performance, probably because of decreased vigilance and attention. If replicated with ALS patients in CLIS, these positive results could indicate the first step towards abolition of complete locked-in states, at least for ALS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002593This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It may be hard to obtain sufficiently large patient populations for concrete and statistically significant conclusions.

    “Additionally, it is apparent from previous work that access to sufficiently large patient populations for concrete and statistically significant conclusions may be difficult to obtain (1–5, 8, 11, 29, 39).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Ball LJB. Duration of AAC technology use by persons with ALS. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2007; 15(4): 371.
  2. [32]Kübler a., Nijboer F, Mellinger J, Vaughan TM, Pawelzik H, Schalk G, et al Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface. Neurology. 2005; 64(10): 1775– 7. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D 15911809 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [37]Pavlov IP. Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press 1927. 448 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaudhary, U., Xia, B., Silvoni, S., Cohen, L. G., & Birbaumer, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Chaudhary, Ujwal
  • Birbaumer, Niels
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
e1002593
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2584955774
Cited by
235
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 20
FWCI
21.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Bi195, Kosellek)
  • Stiftung Volkswagenwerk
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (MOTOR-BIC (FKZ 136W0053))
  • Baden-Württemberg Stiftung (524-4013-16SV7196)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61550110252)
  • EU grant LUMINOUS (686764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
brain-computer interface, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, motor learning, theta oscillations, EEG, electrooculography, support vector machine classification, motor paralysis
MeSH terms
Communication, Electroencephalography, Humans, Oxyhemoglobins, Quadriplegia, ROC Curve, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review