The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 261 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Networks of anatomical covariance
Abstract
Functional imaging or diffusion-weighted imaging techniques are widely used to understand brain connectivity at the systems level and its relation to normal neurodevelopment, cognition or brain disorders. It is also possible to extract information about brain connectivity from the covariance of morphological metrics derived from anatomical MRI. These covariance patterns may arise from genetic influences on normal development and aging, from mutual trophic reinforcement as well as from experience-related plasticity. This review describes the basic methodological strategies, the biological basis of the observed covariance as well as applications in normal brain and brain disease before a final review of future prospects for the technique.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Microscopic alterations in brain volume and anisotropy can be caused by changes in synaptogenesis, neuronal morphology, fiber density, and axonal branching as well as by extraneuronal changes, such as glial cell number or angiogenesis (65).”
From Neuroanatomic differences associated with stress susceptibility and resilience (2016) · cites this paper as [65]
In the citing paper
“Although changes in the cellular organization of a specific brain region can result from the molecular processes after neuronal activity (65,68)”
From Neuroanatomic differences associated with stress susceptibility and resilience (2016) · cites this paper as [65]
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · Cited by 10,910
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · Cited by 8,676
Strogatz, S. H. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065725 · Cited by 8,236
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Johansen‐Berg, H., Rueckert, D., Nichols, T. E., Mackay, C. E., Watkins, K. E., Ciccarelli, O., Cader, M. Z., Matthews, P. M., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 · Cited by 6,598
Error and attack tolerance of complex networksPreprint
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2000) · Cited by 6,554
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood
Gilmore, J. H., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Gao, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.1 · Cited by 1,013
Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI
Smith, S. M., Vidaurre, D., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Jenkinson, M., Miller, K. L., Nichols, T. E., Robinson, E. C., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Woolrich, M. W., et al. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.016 · Cited by 952
Hansen, J. Y., Shafiei, G., Markello, R. D., Smart, K., Cox, S. M. L., Nørgaard, M., Beliveau, V., Wu, Y., Gallezot, J.-D., Aumont, É., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01186-3 · Cited by 797
Small-world human brain networks: Perspectives and challenges
Liao, X., Vasilakos, A. V., & Yong He, A. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.018 · Cited by 443
Stoodley, C. J., D’Mello, A. M., Ellegood, J., Jakkamsetti, V., Liu, P., Nebel, M. B., Gibson, J. M., Kelly, E., Meng, F., Cano, C. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0004-1 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Alan C.
- ORCID
- Evans, Alan C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 489-504
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081828863
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 261
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- brain connectivity, morphometrics, anatomical MRI, brain development, brain aging, experience-dependent plasticity, brain disorders
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Brain Diseases, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Models, Statistical, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review