Cited by 66Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and PerceptionLanguage Development and Disorders

“Mom called me!” Behavioral and prefrontal responses of infants to self-names spoken by their mothers

Imafuku, Masahiro, Hakuno, Yoko, Uchida-Ota, Mariko, Yamamoto, Jun-ichi, Minagawa, Yasuyo·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Development of a sense of self is a fundamental process needed for human social interaction. Although functional neuroimaging studies have revealed the importance of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in self-referencing, how this function develops in infancy remains poorly understood. To determine the cerebral basis underlying processing of self-related stimuli, we used behavioral measures and functional multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure prefrontal cortical responses in 6-month-old infants hearing their own names. We also investigated the influence of a mother's voice on name perception in infants - an ability that plays a crucial role in the recognition of social signals. Experiment 1 measured the behavioral preferences of infants for their own names and for other names, spoken either by their mothers or by strangers. Results showed that infants significantly preferred their own name to other names, regardless of speaker type. Experiment 2 examined hemodynamic responses to the same four conditions in the prefrontal cortex. Compared with other names, hearing their own names, especially when spoken by their mother, elicited greater activity in the infant's dorsal mPFC. Furthermore, the magnitude of the cerebral response correlated with the degree of behavioral preference only when involving their mother's voice. These findings suggest that, particularly in the context of their mothers' voice, the dorsal mPFC of infants is already sensitive to social signals related to self at 6 months. At the same time, familiarity and affection related processing are also discussed as possible factors modulating dorsal mPFC activation at this age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.034

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imafuku, M., Hakuno, Y., Uchida-Ota, M., Yamamoto, J.-I., & Minagawa, Y.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
103
Pages
476-484
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042646586
Cited by
66
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Keio University (24118508, 24300105)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
self-reference, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, infant language development, maternal voice, hemodynamic response, social signals, self-awareness development, near-infrared spectroscopy
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Self Concept, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Prefrontal Cortex, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review