Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Reduced capacity to cognitively regulate emotional responses is a common impairment across major neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain systems supporting one such strategy, cognitive reappraisal of emotion, have been investigated extensively in the healthy population, a research focus that has led to influential meta-analyses and literature reviews. However, the emerging literature on neural substrates underlying cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations is yet to be systematically reviewed. Therefore, the goal of the current review was to summarize the literature on cognitive reappraisal and highlight common and distinct neural correlates of impaired emotion regulation in clinical populations. We performed a two-stage systematic literature search, selecting 32 studies on cognitive reappraisal in individuals with mood disorders (n=12), anxiety disorders (n=14), addiction (n=2), schizophrenia (n=2), and personality disorders (n=5). Comparing findings across these disorders allowed us to determine underlying mechanisms that were either disorder-specific or common across disorders. Results showed that across clinical populations, individuals consistently demonstrated reduced recruitment of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) during downregulation of negative emotion, indicating that there may be a core deficit in selection, manipulation and inhibition during reappraisal. Further, in individuals with mood disorders, amygdala responses were enhanced during downregulation of emotion, suggesting hyperactive bottom-up responses or reduced modulatory capacity. In individuals with anxiety disorders, however, emotion regulation revealed reduced activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and inferior/superior parietal cortex, possibly indicating a deficit in allocation of attention. The reviewed studies thus provide evidence for both disorder-specific and common deficits across clinical populations. These findings highlight the role of distinct neural substrates as targets for developing/assessing novel therapeutic approaches that are geared towards cognitive regulation of emotion, as well as the importance of transdiagnostic research to identify both disorder specific and core mechanisms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across studies, a general pattern emerges of disrupted prefrontal activity in individuals with social anxiety disorder compared to healthy controls when they are explicitly instructed to use a regulatory strategy.
“Across these studies, there is a general trend for disrupted (increased or decreased) levels of activity in prefrontal regions (dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dl/vlPFC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC) among individuals with SAD, relative to healthy control participants when explicitly instructed to engage in a regulatory strategy (for recent meta-analyses, see Brühl et”
From Treatment for social anxiety disorder alters functional connectivity in emotion regulation neural circuitry (2017) · cites this paper as Zilverstand et al., 2016
The Results (§3, §3.2) include five social anxiety disorder studies and report altered dlPFC, vlPFC, and dACC activity during cognitive reappraisal compared with healthy controls, including one study with increased dlPFC activity. However, the reported cross-study pattern is for anxiety disorders as a group, not specifically for social anxiety disorder; the paper does not establish that the same pattern holds across the SAD studies alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAtypical recruitment of cortical regions, including dl/vl/mPFC and ACC, in SAD may be associated with emotion regulation deficits.
“Moreover, aberrant recruitment of cortical regions in SAD, including dorsolateral, ventrolateral, and medial prefrontal cortex (dl/vl/mPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), may be linked to deficits in emotion regulation (Brühl, Delsignore, et al., 2014; Picó-Pérez, Radua, Steward, Menchón, & Soriano-Mas, 2017; Zilverstand, Parvaz, & Goldstein, 2017).”
From Changes in functional connectivity with cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder predict outcomes at follow-up (2020) · cites this paper as Zilverstand, Parvaz, & Goldstein, 2017
The Results (§3.2; page not provided) report reduced dlPFC, vlPFC, and dACC recruitment during emotion regulation in anxiety disorders, and the Discussion (§4.1) links the dACC finding to a possible regulatory deficit. The review includes SAD studies but reports these findings for anxiety disorders as a group, not specifically SAD; the cited passages also do not establish atypical mPFC recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDuring cognitive reappraisal tasks, depressed patients have shown decreased activation in lateral and medial PFC coupled with increases in amygdalar response, and altered mPFC-amygdalar connectivity, suggesting impaired volitional PFC regulation of the amygdala.
“During 'cognitive reappraisal' tasks, in which volitional attempts are made to down-regulate subjective negative responses to negative stimuli 62 , depressed patients have shown decreased activation in lateral and medial PFC coupled with increases in amygdalar response 63,64 , and altered mPFC-amygdalar connectivity 65 , suggesting impaired volitional PFC regulation of the amygdala.”
From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is thought critical for top-down conscious reappraisal when reprocessing emotionally latent memories, such as traumatic experiences, in order to dampen the negative affect associated with them.
“In particular, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is thought critical for top-down conscious reappraisal when reprocessing emotionally latent memories, such as traumatic experiences, in order to dampen the negative affect associated with them (Picó-Pérez et al., 2017; Ligeza et al., 2016; Zilverstand et al., 2017).”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Zilverstand et al., 2017
The Introduction (§1.2; page not provided) describes the dlPFC as part of a cognitive-control network involved in reappraisal and suggests that it helps manipulate appraisals. The Results (§3.2; page not provided) link reduced dlPFC recruitment with downregulation of negative emotion. The paper does not establish this role specifically for reprocessing emotionally latent or traumatic memories. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe dorsal attentional network and the default-mode network work in tandem to facilitate further activation of the central executive network necessary to carry out higher-order cognitive tasks, including emotional regulatory processes, which are typically altered among individuals with PTSD.
“The dorsal attentional network and the default-mode network are thought to work in tandem to facilitate further activation of the central executive network necessary to carry out higher-order cognitive tasks, including emotional regulatory processes (Picó-Pérez et al., 2017; Zilverstand et al., 2017) typically altered among individuals with PTSD (Steinvorth et al., 2006; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Zilverstand et al., 2017
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Prior findings disagree about which prefrontal subregions are involved and whether activation is increased or decreased relative to healthy controls.
“However, findings have been inconsistent regarding the specific prefrontal sub-regions as well as direction of effects (both relatively increased (Brühl, Delsignore, et al., 2014; Goldin et al., 2009) or decreased activation (Zilverstand et al., 2017) compared to healthy individuals).”
From Changes in functional connectivity with cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder predict outcomes at follow-up (2020) · cites this paper as Zilverstand et al., 2017
Disruptions in this inhibitory control mechanism may underlie deficient emotion regulation across diagnostic categories.
“Disruptions in this inhibitory control mechanism may underlie deficient emotion regulation across diagnostic categories (McTeague et al., 2020, Zilverstand et al., 2017).”
From Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder (2020) · cites this paper as Zilverstand et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 360
- Authors
- Zilverstand, A., Parvaz, M. A., & Goldstein, R. Z.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldstein, Rita Z.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 105-116
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5145785
- OpenAlex
- W2414922822
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Rubicon 446-14-015)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1F32DA033088, 1U01DA041174-01, 1R01DA041528-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, neural correlates, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, addiction, schizophrenia, personality disorders, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, amygdala, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, transdiagnostic mechanisms, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Affective Symptoms, Mental Disorders, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review