A novel measure of reliability in Diffusion Tensor Imaging after data rejections due to subject motion
Open accessAbstract
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is commonly challenged by subject motion during data acquisition, which often leads to corrupted image data. Currently used procedure in DTI analysis is to correct or completely reject such data before tensor estimations, however assessing the reliability and accuracy of the estimated tensor in such situations has evaded previous studies. This work aims to define the loss of data accuracy with increasing image rejections, and to define a robust method for assessing reliability of the result at voxel level. We carried out simulations of every possible sub-scheme (N=1,073,567,387) of Jones30 gradient scheme, followed by confirming the idea with MRI data from four newborn and three adult subjects. We assessed the relative error of the most commonly used tensor estimates for DTI and tractography studies, fractional anisotropy (FA) and the major orientation vector (V1), respectively. The error was estimated using two measures, the widely used electric potential (EP) criteria as well as the rotationally variant condition number (CN). Our results show that CN and EP are comparable in situations with very few rejections, but CN becomes clearly more sensitive to depicting errors when more gradient vectors and images were rejected. The error in FA and V1 was also found depend on the actual FA level in the given voxel; low actual FA levels were related to high relative errors in the FA and V1 estimates. Finally, the results were confirmed with clinical MRI data. This showed that the errors after rejections are, indeed, inhomogeneous across brain regions. The FA and V1 errors become progressively larger when moving from the thick white matter bundles towards more superficial subcortical structures. Our findings suggest that i) CN is a useful estimator of data reliability at voxel level, and ii) DTI preprocessing with data rejections leads to major challenges when assessing brain tissue with lower FA levels, such as all newborn brain, as well as the adult superficial, subcortical areas commonly traced in precise connectivity analyses between cortical regions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motion in the scanner can significantly influence measures of cortical thickness and surface area, DTI parameters, and resting-state networks.
“It is increasingly recognized that motion in the scanner can significantly influence measures of cortical thickness and surface area27, 218, as well as DTI parameters (Box 2)219 and resting-state networks (Box 3)220,219.”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [219]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Sairanen, V., Kuusela, L., Sipilä, O., Savolainen, S., & Vanhatalo, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Sairanen, Viljami
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2557680703
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland (288220, 276523)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- diffusion tensor imaging, subject motion, data rejection, reliability analysis, condition number, fractional anisotropy, tractography, white matter, neonatal brain, subcortical structures
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Newborn, Male, Motion, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Anisotropy, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review