Cited by 77Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Aberrant memory system connectivity and working memory performance in subjective cognitive decline

Open access
Viviano, Raymond P., Hayes, Jessica M., Pruitt, Patrick J., Fernandez, Zachary J., van Rooden, Sanneke, van der Grond, Jeroen, Rombouts, Serge A.R.B., Damoiseaux, Jessica S.·2019·NeuroImage

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline, a perceived worsening of cognitive functioning without objective deficit on assessment, could indicate incipient dementia. However, the neural correlates of subjective cognitive decline as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging remain somewhat unclear. Here, we evaluated differences in functional connectivity across memory regions, and cognitive performance, between healthy older adults aged 50 to 85 with (n = 35, Age = 68.5 ± 7.7, 22 female), and without (n = 48, Age = 67.0 ± 8.8, 29 female) subjective cognitive decline. We also evaluated neurite density, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity of the parahippocampal cingulum, cingulate gyrus cingulum, and uncinate fiber bundles in a subsample of participants (n = 37). Participants with subjective cognitive decline displayed lower average functional connectivity across regions of a putative posterior memory system, and lower retrosplenial-precuneus functional connectivity specifically, than those without memory complaints. Furthermore, participants with subjective cognitive decline performed poorer than controls on visual working memory. However, groups did not differ in cingulum or uncinate diffusion measures. Our results show differences in functional connectivity and visual working memory in participants with subjective cognitive decline that could indicate potential incipient dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.015

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjects with subjective cognitive decline exhibit higher functional connectivity in the retrosplenial cortex and precuneus and lower functional connectivity in the frontal-parietal cortex and putative posterior memory system.

    “Subjects with SCD exhibited higher FC in the retrosplenial cortex and precuneus and lower FC in the frontal-parietal cortex and putative posterior memory system [115, 136, 137].”
  • In individuals with SCD, significantly decreased FA and increased MD have been observed in the cerebrum, mainly in the hippocampal body, entorhinal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus, uncinated fasciculi, longitudinal fasciculi and corpus callosum, whereas some studies reported no statistically significant differences in diffusion metrics.

    “In individuals with SCD, significantly decreased FA and increased MD have been observed in the cerebrum, mainly in the hippocampal body, entorhinal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus, uncinated fasciculi, longitudinal fasciculi and corpus callosum [77, 78, 109–113], whereas Kiuchi et al. and Viviano et al. reported no statistically significant differences in diffusion metrics [114, 115].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viviano, R. P., Hayes, J. M., Pruitt, P. J., Fernandez, Z. J., van Rooden, S., van der Grond, J., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Damoiseaux, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Damoiseaux, Jessica S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
185
Pages
556-564
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896182767
Cited by
77
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (016.136.072)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
subjective cognitive decline, functional connectivity, visual working memory, uncinate fasciculus, white matter microstructure, diffusion MRI, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review