Cited by 12Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Combining white matter diffusion and geometry for tract-specific alignment and variability analysis

Benou, Itay, Veksler, Ronel, Friedman, Alon, Raviv, Tammy Riklin·2019·NeuroImage

Abstract

We present a framework for along-tract analysis of white matter (WM) fiber bundles based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography. We introduce the novel concept of fiber-flux density for modeling fiber tracts' geometry, and combine it with diffusion-based measures to define vector descriptors called Fiber-Flux Diffusion Density (FFDD). The proposed model captures informative features of WM tracts at both the microscopic (diffusion-related) and macroscopic (geometry-related) scales, thus enabling improved sensitivity to subtle structural abnormalities that are not reflected by either diffusion or geometrical properties alone. A key step in this framework is the construction of an FFDD dissimilarity measure for sub-voxel alignment of fiber bundles, based on the fast marching method (FMM). The obtained aligned WM tracts enable meaningful inter-subject comparisons and group-wise statistical analysis. Moreover, we show that the FMM alignment can be generalized in a straight forward manner to a single-shot co-alignment of multiple fiber bundles. The proposed alignment technique is shown to outperform a well-established, commonly used DTI registration algorithm. We demonstrate the FFDD framework on the Human Connectome Project (HCP) diffusion MRI dataset, as well as on two different datasets of contact sports players. We test our method using longitudinal scans of a basketball player diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury, showing compatibility with structural MRI findin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most widely used streamline labeling approaches perform linear registration, while many studies have proposed non-linear approaches to enable deformations of the streamlines.

    “Most widely used approaches perform a linear registration (Garyfallidis et al., 2015; O’Donnell et al., 2012), while many studies have proposed to perform non-linear approaches to enable deformations of the streamlines (Benou et al., 2019; Chandio and Garyfallidis, 2020; Olivetti et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benou, I., Veksler, R., Friedman, A., & Raviv, T. R.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Raviv, Tammy Riklin
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
200
Pages
674-689
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946440603
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Defense
  • Israel Science Foundation (1638/16)
  • United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  • Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
white matter fiber bundles, diffusion tensor imaging, tractography, fast marching method, interindividual variability, traumatic brain injury, repetitive head impacts, football players, basketball players, Human Connectome Project, structural MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Humans, Male, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review