Cited by 620Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis.

Open access
Raffelt, David A., Tournier, J.-Donald, Smith, Robert E., Vaughan, David N., Jackson, Graeme, Ridgway, Gerard R., Connelly, Alan·2017·NeuroImage

Abstract

Voxel-based analysis of diffusion MRI data is increasingly popular. However, most white matter voxels contain contributions from multiple fibre populations (often referred to as crossing fibres), and therefore voxel-averaged quantitative measures (e.g. fractional anisotropy) are not fibre-specific and have poor interpretability. Using higher-order diffusion models, parameters related to fibre density can be extracted for individual fibre populations within each voxel ('fixels'), and recent advances in statistics enable the multi-subject analysis of such data. However, investigating within-voxel microscopic fibre density alone does not account for macroscopic differences in the white matter morphology (e.g. the calibre of a fibre bundle). In this work, we introduce a novel method to investigate the latter, which we call fixel-based morphometry (FBM). To obtain a more complete measure related to the total number of white matter axons, information from both within-voxel microscopic fibre density and macroscopic morphology must be combined. We therefore present the FBM method as an integral piece within a comprehensive fixel-based analysis framework to investigate measures of fibre density, fibre-bundle morphology (cross-section), and a combined measure of fibre density and cross-section. We performed simulations to demonstrate the proposed measures using various transformations of a numerical fibre bundle phantom. Finally, we provide an example of such an analysis by comparing a clinical patient group to a healthy control group, which demonstrates that all three measures provide distinct and complementary information. By capturing information from both sources, the combined fibre density and cross-section measure is likely to be more sensitive to certain pathologies and more directly interpretable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jackson G.D. Berkovic S.F. Duncan J.S. Connelly A. Optimizing the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis using MR imaging Am. J. Neuroradiol. 14 1993 753 762 8517369 PMC8333381
  2. Raffelt, D., Crozier, S., Connelly, A., Salvado, O., Tournier, J.-D., 2010. Apparent fibre density: a new measure for high angular resolution diffusion-weighted image analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Presented at the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm. Sweden, p. 575.
  3. Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., Connelly, A., 2013. A robust spherical deconvolution method for the analysis of low SNR or low angular resolution diffusion data. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raffelt, D. A., Tournier, J.-D., Smith, R. E., Vaughan, D. N., Jackson, G., Ridgway, G. R., & Connelly, A.
Affiliations
  • Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Raffelt, David A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
144
Issue
Pt A
Pages
58-73
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520744072
Cited by
620
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
19.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  • Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure
  • UK Medical Research Council (MR/J014257/2)
  • Wellcome Trust (091593/Z/10/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fixel-based analysis, crossing fibers, axon number
MeSH terms
Humans, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review