The pulse: transient fMRI signal increases in subcortical arousal systems during transitions in attention
Open accessAbstract
Studies of attention emphasize cortical circuits for salience monitoring and top-down control. However, subcortical arousal systems have a major influence on dynamic cortical state. We hypothesize that task-related increases in attention begin with a "pulse" in subcortical arousal and cortical attention networks, which are reflected indirectly through transient fMRI signals. We conducted general linear model and model-free analyses of fMRI data from two cohorts and tasks with mixed block and event-related design. 46 adolescent subjects at our center and 362 normal adults from the Human Connectome Project participated. We identified a core shared network of transient fMRI increases in subcortical arousal and cortical salience/attention networks across cohorts and tasks. Specifically, we observed a transient pulse of fMRI increases both at task block onset and with individual task events in subcortical arousal areas including midbrain tegmentum, thalamus, nucleus basalis and striatum; cortical-subcortical salience network regions including the anterior insula/claustrum and anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area; in dorsal attention network regions including dorsolateral frontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule; as well as in motor regions including cerebellum, and left hemisphere hand primary motor cortex. The transient pulse of fMRI increases in subcortical and cortical arousal and attention networks was consistent across tasks and study populations, whereas sustained activity in these same networks was more variable. The function of the transient pulse in these networks is unknown. However, given its anatomical distribution, it could participate in a neuromodulatory surge of activity in multiple parallel neurotransmitter systems facilitating dynamic changes in conscious attention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fast-event-related design adopted here might be suboptimal to detect activity changes in the salience network, potentially underestimating some regions that might be involved in conscious processing.
“and that the fast-event-related design adopted here might be suboptimal to detect activity changes in the salience network120, that is, potentially underestimating some regions that might be involved in conscious processing.”
From Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [120]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Corbetta M, Shulman GL, 2002b. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 3, 201– 215. 11994752
- Faingold C, Blumenfeld H, 2013. Neuronal networks in brain function, CNS disorders, and Therapeutics. Academic Press.
- Laureys S, Gosseries O, Tononi G, 2015. The Neurology of Consciousness: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropathology, 2nd Edition Academic Press.
- Authors
- Li, R., Ryu, J. H., Vincent, P., Springer, M., Kluger, D., Levinsohn, E. A., Chen, Y., Chen, H., & Blumenfeld, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blumenfeld, Hal
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 232
- Pages
- 117873
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8278331
- OpenAlex
- W3134523506
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01NS055829)
- Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2019YFS0429)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61906034, 82072006)
- China Scholarship Council (CSC 201506070056)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- attention, salience network, dorsal attention network, midbrain tegmentum, thalamus, nucleus basalis of Meynert, striatum, anterior insula, claustrum, anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, cerebellum, primary motor cortex, neuromodulation, Human Connectome Project
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Attention, Child, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Thalamus, Cohort Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review