The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population
Schneidman, E., Berry, M. J., Segev, R., & Bialek, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04701 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationNeural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743
Predictive information in a sensory population
Palmer, S. E., Marre, O., Berry, M. J., & Bialek, W. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506855112 · Cited by 257
Self-citationInformation decomposition and the informational architecture of the brain
Luppi, A. I., Rosas, F. E., Mediano, P. A. M., Menon, D. K., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.005 · Cited by 140
Reconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells
Brackbill, N., Rhoades, C., Kling, A., Shah, N. P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58516 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Puchalla, J. L., Schneidman, E., Harris, R. A., & Berry, M. J.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493-504
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102866130
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.026
- The paper
- Puchalla, J. L., Schneidman, E., Harris, R. A., & Berry, M. J. (2005). Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
