Cited by 58Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionRetinal Development and Disorders

Reconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells

Open access
Brackbill, Nora, Rhoades, Colleen, Kling, Alexandra, Shah, Nishal P, Sher, Alexander, Litke, Alan M, Chichilnisky, EJ·2020·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The visual message conveyed by a retinal ganglion cell (RGC) is often summarized by its spatial receptive field, but in principle also depends on the responses of other RGCs and natural image statistics. This possibility was explored by linear reconstruction of natural images from responses of the four numerically-dominant macaque RGC types. Reconstructions were highly consistent across retinas. The optimal reconstruction filter for each RGC – its visual message – reflected natural image statistics, and resembled the receptive field only when nearby, same-type cells were included. ON and OFF cells conveyed largely independent, complementary representations, and parasol and midget cells conveyed distinct features. Correlated activity and nonlinearities had statistically significant but minor effects on reconstruction. Simulated reconstructions, using linear-nonlinear cascade models of RGC light responses that incorporated measured spatial properties and nonlinearities, produced similar results. Spatiotemporal reconstructions exhibited similar spatial properties, suggesting that the results are relevant for natural vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.58516

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brackbill, N., Rhoades, C., Kling, A., Shah, N. P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Brackbill, Nora
Venue
eLife
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
9
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095078854
Cited by
57
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF IGERT 0801700, GRFP DGE-114747, CRCNS Grant IIS-1430348)
  • National Eye Institute (F31EY027166, R01-EY029247)
  • Pew Charitable Trusts (Fellowship in Biomedical Sciences)
  • John Chen (Donation)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01EY017992, R01-EY029247, CRCNS Grant IIS-1430348)
  • Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
retinal ganglion cells, natural image reconstruction, receptive fields, macaque retina, ON and OFF cells, parasol cells, midget cells, linear reconstruction, natural image statistics, correlated neuronal activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Microelectrodes, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review