CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Visual perception and processing mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond the Edges of a View: Boundary Extension in Human Scene-Selective Visual Cortex

Open access
Park, Soojin, Intraub, Helene, Yi, Do-Joon, Widders, David, Chun, Marvin M.·2007·Neuron
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To allow perception of a continuous world, cortical mechanisms extrapolate missing information with highly constrained predictions about the environment just beyond the edges of a view. Here, we report functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for extrapolation of scene layout information beyond what was physically presented, an illusion known as boundary extension. Consistent with behavioral reports, we observed boundary extension for scene-selective attenuation in the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC), but no such extrapolation of object representations in the lateral occipital complex (LOC). These results demonstrate that scene layout representations are extrapolated beyond the confines of the perceptual input. Such extrapolation may facilitate perception of a continuous world from discontinuous views.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.006

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Park, S., Intraub, H., Yi, D.-J., Widders, D., & Chun, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Intraub, Helene
  • Chun, Marvin M.
ORCID
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
335-342
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.006
OpenAlex
W2170597025
Cited by
144
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
boundary extension, parahippocampal place area, retrosplenial cortex, lateral occipital complex, perceptual prediction, object representation, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Illusions, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Occipital Lobe, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review