Cited by 1,039Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFace Recognition and Perception

Change blindness.

Simons, Daniel J., Levin, Daniel T.·1997·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Although at any instant we experience a rich, detailed visual world, we do not use such visual details to form a stable representation across views. Over the past five years, researchers have focused increasingly on 'change blindness' (the inability to detect changes to an object or scene) as a means to examine the nature of our representations. Experiments using a diverse range of methods and displays have produced strikingly similar results: unless a change to a visual scene produces a localizable change or transient at a specific position on the retina, generally, people will not detect it. We review theory and research motivating work on change blindness and discuss recent evidence that people are blind to changes occurring in photographs, in motion pictures and even in real-world interactions. These findings suggest that relatively little visual information is preserved from one view to the next, and question a fundamental assumption that has underlain perception research for centuries: namely, that we need to store a detailed visual representation in the mind/brain from one view to the next.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(97)01080-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
1
Issue
7
Pages
261-267
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234969819
Cited by
1,039
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
change blindness, visual scene representation, visual perception, visual memory, object recognition, scene perception, visual constancy, cinema, photographs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review