Cited by 155Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

Cornichon proteins determine the subunit composition of synaptic AMPA receptors

Open access
Herring, Bruce E., Shi, Yun, Suh, Young Ho, Zheng, Chan-Ying, Blankenship, Sabine M., Roche, Katherine W., Nicoll, Roger A.·2013·Neuron

Abstract

Cornichon-2 and cornichon-3 (CNIH-2/-3) are AMPA receptor (AMPAR) binding proteins that promote receptor trafficking and markedly slow AMPAR deactivation in heterologous cells, but their role in neurons is unclear. Using CNIH-2 and CNIH-3 conditional knockout mice, we find a profound reduction of AMPAR synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. This deficit is due to the selective loss of surface GluA1-containing AMPARs (GluA1A2 heteromers), leaving a small residual pool of synaptic GluA2A3 heteromers. The kinetics of AMPARs in neurons lacking CNIH-2/-3 are faster than those in WT neurons due to the fast kinetics of GluA2A3 heteromers. The remarkably selective effect of CNIHs on the GluA1 subunit is probably mediated by TARP γ-8, which prevents a functional association of CNIHs with non-GluA1 subunits. These results point to a sophisticated interplay between CNIHs and γ-8 that dictates subunit-specific AMPAR trafficking and the strength and kinetics of synaptic AMPAR-mediated transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNIH and TARPs likely compete for the same AMPAR binding sites, and one possible function of CNIH is to regulate the stoichiometry of TARP interaction, tuning the channel properties of associated AMPARs.

    “CNIH and TARPs likely compete for the same AMPAR binding sites (Straub and Tomita, 2012, Herring et al., 2013), and so one possible function of CNIH is to regulate the stoichiometry of TARP interaction, tuning the channel properties of the associated AMPARs.”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Herring et al., 2013

    The Results section (‘TARP γ-8 reverses…’; page unavailable) says that unchanged γ-8/AMPAR stoichiometry strongly argues CNIH-2 does not displace γ-8 and that the two can co-occupy GluA1 subunits. The Discussion (‘A model for the interaction…’; page unavailable) proposes four γ-8 molecules on the receptor combinations examined, contrary to CNIH regulating TARP stoichiometry by competing for those sites. The paper does report a different, subunit-specific interaction: γ-8 prevents CNIH from interacting with non-GluA1 subunits. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TARP γ-8 effectively prevented CNIH2/3 interaction with GluA2/3 heteromeric receptors, suggesting CNIH proteins may control the subunit composition of synaptic AMPARs.

    “TARP γ-8 effectively prevented CNIH2/3 interaction with GluA2/3 heteromeric receptors suggesting that CNIH proteins may control the subunit composition of synaptic AMPARs (Herring et al., 2013).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Herring et al., 2013

    The Discussion’s model for GluA2A3 heteromers says the receptors did not coimmunoprecipitate CNIH-2 and proposes that they contain γ-8 but no CNIH, supporting the proposed link to synaptic AMPAR subunit composition. It calls γ-8’s inhibition of CNIH interaction with GluA3 speculative, however, so the claim presents that mechanism more definitively than the paper does. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Andrasfalvy BK Smith MA Borchardt T Sprengel R Magee JC 2003 Impaired regulation of synaptic strength in hippocampal neurons from GluR1-deficient mice J Physiol 552 35 45 12878757 PMC2343312
  2. Bokel C Dass S Wilsch-Brauninger M Roth S 2006 Drosophila Cornichon acts as cargo receptor for ER export of the TGFalpha-like growth factor Gurken Development 133 459 470 16396907
  3. Castillon GA Watanabe R Taylor M Schwabe TM Riezman H 2009 Concentration of GPI-anchored proteins upon ER exit in yeast Traffic 10 186 200 19054390
  4. Coombs ID Cull-Candy SG 2009 Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins and AMPA receptor function in the cerebellum Neuroscience 162 656 665 19185052 PMC3217091
  5. Diaz E 2010 Regulation of AMPA receptors by transmembrane accessory proteins Eur J Neurosci 32 261 268 20946114
  6. Douyard J Shen L Huganir RL Rubio ME 2007 Differential neuronal and glial expression of GluR1 AMPA receptor subunit and the scaffolding proteins SAP97 and 4.1N during rat cerebellar development J Comp Neurol 502 141 156 17335044
  7. Gill MB Kato AS Roberts MF Yu H Wang H Tomita S Bredt DS 2011 Cornichon-2 modulates AMPA receptor-transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein assembly to dictate gating and pharmacology J Neurosci 31 6928 6938 21543622 PMC4562416
  8. Gill MB Kato AS Wang H Bredt DS 2012 AMPA receptor modulation by cornichon-2 dictated by transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein isoform Eur J Neurosci 35 182 194 22211840
  9. Goebbels S Bormuth I Bode U Hermanson O Schwab MH Nave KA 2006 Genetic targeting of principal neurons in neocortex and hippocampus of NEX-Cre mice Genesis 44 611 621 17146780
  10. Harmel N Cokic B Zolles G Berkefeld H Mauric V Fakler B Stein V Klocker N 2012 AMPA receptors commandeer an ancient cargo exporter for use as an auxiliary subunit for signaling PLoS ONE 7 e30681 22292017 PMC3265512
  11. Jackson AC Nicoll RA 2011 The expanding social network of ionotropic glutamate receptors: TARPs and other transmembrane auxiliary subunits Neuron 70 178 199 21521608 PMC3119519
  12. Kato AS Gill MB Ho MT Yu H Tu Y Siuda ER Wang H Qian YW Nisenbaum ES Tomita S Bredt DS 2010a Hippocampal AMPA receptor gating controlled by both TARP and cornichon proteins Neuron 68 1082 1096 21172611 PMC3034222
  13. Kato AS Gill MB Yu H Nisenbaum ES Bredt DS 2010b TARPs differentially decorate AMPA receptors to specify neuropharmacology Trends Neurosci 33 241 248 20219255
  14. Lu W Shi Y Jackson AC Bjorgan K During MJ Sprengel R Seeburg PH Nicoll RA 2009 Subunit composition of synaptic AMPA receptors revealed by a single-cell genetic approach Neuron 62 254 268 19409270 PMC3632349
  15. Roche KW Huganir RL 1995 Synaptic expression of the high-affinity kainate receptor subunit KA2 in hippocampal cultures Neuroscience 69 383 393 8552236
  16. Roth S Neuman-Silberberg FS Barcelo G Schupbach T 1995 Cornichon and the EGF receptor signaling process are necessary for both anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral pattern formation in Drosophila Cell 81 967 978 7540118
  17. Rouach N Byrd K Petralia RS Elias GM Adesnik H Tomita S Karimzadegan S Kealey C Bredt DS Nicoll RA 2005 TARP gamma-8 controls hippocampal AMPA receptor number, distribution and synaptic plasticity Nat Neurosci 8 1525 1533 16222232
  18. Schnell E Sizemore M Karimzadegan S Chen L Bredt DS Nicoll RA 2002 Direct interactions between PSD-95 and stargazin control synaptic AMPA receptor number Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 13902 13907 12359873 PMC129795
  19. Schwenk J Harmel N Zolles G Bildl W Kulik A Heimrich B Chisaka O Jonas P Schulte U Fakler B Klocker N 2009 Functional proteomics identify cornichon proteins as auxiliary subunits of AMPA receptors Science 323 1313 1319 19265014
  20. Shi Y Lu W Milstein AD Nicoll RA 2009 The stoichiometry of AMPA receptors and TARPs varies by neuronal cell type Neuron 62 633 640 19524523 PMC3119531
  21. Shi Y Suh YH Milstein AD Isozaki K Schmid SM Roche KW Nicoll RA 2010 Functional comparison of the effects of TARPs and cornichons on AMPA receptor trafficking and gating Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 16315 16319 20805473 PMC2941340
  22. Straub C Tomita S 2011 The regulation of glutamate receptor trafficking and function by TARPs and other transmembrane auxiliary subunits Curr Opin Neurobiol 22 488 495 21993243 PMC3265624
  23. von Engelhardt J Mack V Sprengel R Kavenstock N Li KW Stern-Bach Y Smit AB Seeburg PH Monyer H 2010 CKAMP44: a brain-specific protein attenuating short-term synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus Science 327 1518 1522 20185686
  24. Wang R Walker CS Brockie PJ Francis MM Mellem JE Madsen DM Maricq AV 2008 Evolutionary conserved role for TARPs in the gating of glutamate receptors and tuning of synaptic function Neuron 59 997 1008 18817737 PMC2754846
  25. Zamanillo D Sprengel R Hvalby O Jensen V Burnashev N Rozov A Kaiser KM Koster HJ Borchardt T Worley P 1999 Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning Science 284 1805 1811 10364547
  26. Zheng Y Mellem JE Brockie PJ Madsen DM Maricq AV 2004 SOL-1 is a CUB-domain protein required for GLR-1 glutamate receptor function in C. elegans Nature 427 451 457 14749834

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herring, B. E., Shi, Y., Suh, Y. H., Zheng, C.-Y., Blankenship, S. M., Roche, K. W., & Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Ajou University (KR)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Suh, Young Ho
  • Nicoll, Roger A.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1083-1096
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005465545
Cited by
155
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070957, R01MH080379)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS016033)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Keywords
AMPA receptors, GluR1, GluA2, receptor subunit composition, synaptic transmission, hippocampus, conditional knockout mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synaptic Transmission, Organ Culture Techniques, Synapses, Receptors, AMPA, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Protein Subunits, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review