Cited by 42Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

Spatial Patterns of Persistent Neural Activity Vary with the Behavioral Context of Short-Term Memory

Open access
Daie, Kayvon, Goldman, Mark S., Aksay, Emre R.F.·2015·Neuron

Abstract

A short-term memory can be evoked by different inputs and control separate targets in different behavioral contexts. To address the circuit mechanisms underlying context-dependent memory function, we determined through optical imaging how memory is encoded at the whole-network level in two behavioral settings. Persistent neural activity maintaining a memory of desired eye position was imaged throughout the oculomotor integrator after saccadic or optokinetic stimulation. While eye position was encoded by the amplitude of network activity, the spatial patterns of firing were context dependent: cells located caudally generally were most persistent following saccadic input, whereas cells located rostrally were most persistent following optokinetic input. To explain these data, we computationally identified four independent modes of network activity and found these were differentially accessed by saccadic and optokinetic inputs. These results show how a circuit can simultaneously encode memory value and behavioral context, respectively, in its amplitude and spatial pattern of persistent firing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The connectome for the VPNI contains two weakly coupled three-block cycles that lead to a corresponding pair of large real eigenvalues, providing an anatomical basis for the low-dimensional neural activity observed in this network.

    “we found the connectome for the VPNI to contain two weakly coupled three-block cycles that lead to a corresponding pair of large real eigenvalues, providing an anatomical basis for the low-dimensional neural activity observed in this network16,55.”

    From Predicting modular functions and neural coding of behavior from a synaptic wiring diagram (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (Potential mechanism of context-dependent persistent activity; page unavailable) report multiple modes of VPNI activity, and the Experimental Procedures describe a rank-four model connectivity matrix chosen to reproduce them. The paper does not report a measured VPNI connectome, two weakly coupled three-block cycles, or a corresponding pair of large real eigenvalues. It therefore supports the low-dimensional activity premise, but not the claimed anatomical explanation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Low-dimensional attractors have been proposed to underlie a large range of neural computations, from storage of working memory to reduction of noise in sensory and cognitive representations.

    “Low-dimensional attractors have been proposed to underlie a large range of neural computations, from storage of working memory to reduction of noise in sensory and cognitive representations16,17.”

    From Predicting modular functions and neural coding of behavior from a synaptic wiring diagram (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe attractor models of persistent activity in short-term memory circuits, supporting the working-memory part of the claim. They do not propose that attractors reduce noise in sensory or cognitive representations; the mention of noise in Experimental Procedures concerns measurement and analysis, not that proposed function. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The imaged volume includes neurons involved in eye movements.

    “The imaged volume includes neurons involved in eye movements16,21,22,28.”
  • Persistent activity in the oculomotor integrator is thought to be realized by low-dimensional attractor dynamics.

    “Persistent activity in this system is thought to be realized by low-dimensional attractor dynamics15,16.”
  • The model predicted a negative correlation between the decay amplitudes, consistent with experiments and previous findings.

    “the model predicted a negative correlation between the decay amplitudes”

    From Predicting modular functions and neural coding of behavior from a synaptic wiring diagram (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results section on heterogeneity in persistent firing reports that relaxation time constants in two fixation contexts were uncorrelated, but those are not decay amplitudes. The model-simulation passages describe slow and fast activity modes without stating that the model predicted a negative correlation between decay amplitudes. Searches for that prediction and related terms found no passage addressing it; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 42

Authors
Daie, K., Goldman, M. S., & Aksay, E. R. F.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Goldman, Mark S.
  • Aksay, Emre R.F.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
847-860
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052795301
Cited by
42
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1208088)
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069726, R01MH065034)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY021581, T32EY007138, EY007138-16)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
short-term memory, persistent activity, saccades, optokinetic stimulation, contextual memory, memory encoding, network modes, computational modeling
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Computer Simulation, Eye Movements, Larva, Luminescent Proteins, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Mutation, Neurons, Rhombencephalon, Zebrafish, Homeodomain Proteins, Zebrafish Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review