The Cognitive Architecture of Spatial Navigation: Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions
Open accessAbstract
Spatial navigation can serve as a model system in cognitive neuroscience, in which specific neural representations, learning rules, and control strategies can be inferred from the vast experimental literature that exists across many species, including humans. Here, we review this literature, focusing on the contributions of hippocampal and striatal systems, and attempt to outline a minimal cognitive architecture that is consistent with the experimental literature and that synthesizes previous related computational modeling. The resulting architecture includes striatal reinforcement learning based on egocentric representations of sensory states and actions, incidental Hebbian association of sensory information with allocentric state representations in the hippocampus, and arbitration of the outputs of both systems based on confidence/uncertainty in medial prefrontal cortex. We discuss the relationship between this architecture and learning in model-free and model-based systems, episodic memory, imagery, and planning, including some open questions and directions for further experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spatial navigation is influenced by several factors such as age and individual spatial abilities.
“This finding aligns with the notion that spatial navigation is influenced by several factors such as age and individual spatial abilities11,12,36–38.”
From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Memory of navigational episodes emerges from the interaction of multiple parallel spatial representations, each supported by a widespread hippocampal-neocortical network.
“Taken together, our findings suggest that memory of navigational episodes emerges from the interaction of multiple parallel spatial representations, each supported by a widespread hippocampal–neocortical network2,5,38.”
From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 180 · Cited by 240
- Authors
- Chersi, F., & Burgess, N.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Chersi, Fabian
- Burgess, Neil
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-77
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1826231742
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 180
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (091593, 095811)
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- spatial navigation, hippocampus, striatum, cognitive architecture, reinforcement learning, Hebbian learning, allocentric spatial representation, egocentric representation, medial prefrontal cortex, model-free learning, model-based learning, episodic memory, mental imagery, planning
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Hippocampus, Humans, Imagination, Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Neostriatum, Prefrontal Cortex, Memory, Episodic, Spatial Navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review