Cited by 69Diversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and DiversityPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

(In)citing Action to Realize an Equitable Future

Open access
Dworkin, Jordan, Zurn, Perry, Bassett, Danielle S.·2020·Neuron

Abstract

Reference lists of neuroscience articles show marked gender imbalances. To mitigate this disparity, we discuss relevant ethical considerations and offer practical recommendations to scientists of all ages. We envision an equitable future by all scientists for all scientists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.011

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All LLM-generated introductions on a certain topic might sound the same and would contain the same set of ideas and references, thereby missing out on innovations and exacerbating citation injustice.

    “all LLM-generated introductions on a certain topic might sound the same and would contain the same set of ideas and references, thereby missing out on innovations (45) and exacerbating citation injustice (46).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dworkin, J., Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • American University (US)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bassett, Danielle S.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
890-894
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036739736
Cited by
69
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • American University Research Archive
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • ISI Foundation
  • NSF (PHY-1554488)
  • Center for Curiosity
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
gender imbalance, gender equity, research ethics, women in science
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Neurosciences, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Research, Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review