Morphine dosing strategy plays a key role in the generation and duration of the produced antinociceptive tolerance
Open accessAbstract
Antinociceptive tolerance after repetitive administration of morphine severely limits its clinical use. Despite increased mechanistic understanding of morphine tolerance, little is known about the influence of dosing regimens in its development. We hypothesized that the starting dose of morphine, dosing frequency and dose increments, influence antinociception and the manifestation of antinociceptive tolerance in rats. Male rats were randomly divided into four groups with different intermittent starting-doses of daily morphine (b.i.d.) followed by different increments of single-dose morphine upon development of antinociceptive tolerance, for 2-3 weeks: 2.5 (b.i.d.)→5 → 10→15 mg/kg/day, 5 (b.i.d.)→10 mg/kg/day, 5 (b.i.d.)→15 mg/kg/day, 10 (b.i.d.)→20 mg/kg/day. Antinociception was assessed daily pre-treatment and at several time-points over 2 h post-administration, using tail-flick and hot-plate assays. Tolerance was defined as significant antinociceptive desensitization and was presented as significant reduction of the maximum and total antinociceptive efficacy upon morphine administration. Rats commenced on 2.5 mg/kg/day (b.i.d.) morphine developed tolerance faster than those started on 5 or 10 mg/kg/day (b.i.d.). Comparatively, higher starting and maintenance doses of morphine produced prolonged antinociception and delayed tolerance. Whereas, lower starting and maintenance doses of morphine produced less total antinociception during the course of treatment and did not delay…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Innate circadian rhythms and timing factors can affect research outcomes such as behavioural, physiological, and immunological parameters.
“Along with innate circadian rhythms, these can affect research outcomes such as behavioural, physiological, and immunological parameters [132,133].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [133]
Cites
Le Bars, D., Gozariu, M., & Cadden, S. W. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01514-x · Cited by 1,459 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677 · see citing works
Profiling the Effects of Repetitive Morphine Administration on Motor Behavior in Rats
Paul, A. K., Gueven, N., & Dietis, N. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26144355 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Paul, A. K., Gueven, N., & Dietis, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Paul, Alok Kumar
- Venue
- Neuropharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 158-166
- ISSN
- 0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2608557767
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- morphine, antinociceptive tolerance, dosing regimen, starting dose, dosing frequency, opioid tolerance, antinociception, tail flick, hot plate, opioid analgesia
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Interactions, Drug Tolerance, Male, Morphine, Pain Measurement, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pain Threshold, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review