Comparative analysis of the modulation of perineuronal nets in the prefrontal cortex of rats during protracted withdrawal from cocaine, heroin and sucrose self-administration
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Relapse into drug use is a significant problem for people recovering from addiction. The ability that conditioned cues have to reinstate and reinvigorate drug-seeking is potentiated over time (incubation of seeking), posing an additional difficulty for maintaining abstinence. While the prefrontal cortex has been involved in the incubation phenomenon and the extracellular matrix, perineuronal nets (PNNs) in particular, may play a vital role in brain plasticity associated to drug relapse, there are no comparative analyses between different drug classes and natural reinforcers. Here, we compare the effects of early (1 day) and protracted (30 days) withdrawal from to cocaine, heroin and sucrose self-administration on the total density and density per intensity range of PNNs of different territories of the prefrontal cortex of male Lewis rats. Our results show that cocaine self-administration increases the density of PNNs in the dorsal prelimbic, infralimbic and ventral orbitofrontal cortices, while protracted withdrawal reversesthis effect in the dorsal prelimbic cortex. Also, heroin self-administration increases the density of PNNs in the infralimbic cortex and ventral orbitofrontal cortices, but this effect is lost after 30 days of withdrawal in the infralimbic cortex. Finally, the self-administration of sucrose-sweetened water or the protracted withdrawal from this powerful reinforcer does not affect any of the PNN parameters analysed. Our results show that two different drugs of abuse (but not a natural reward) with specific pharmacological and physiological actions, differentially modulate PNNs in specific areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex with potential implications for the incubation of seeking phenomenon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The impact of PNN removal appears to be specific for plasticity induced by the learning/memory aspects of drugs of abuse.
“Thus, the impact of PNN removal appears to be specific for plasticity induced by the learning/memory aspects of drugs of abuse.”
From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [166]
Cites
Drug addiction: updating actions to habits to compulsions ten years on
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033457 · Cited by 1,225 · see citing works
The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity
Diering, G. H., & Huganir, R. L. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.018 · Cited by 844 · see citing works
Casting a Wide Net: Role of Perineuronal Nets in Neural Plasticity
Sorg, B. A., Berretta, S., Blacktop, J. M., Fawcett, J. W., Kitagawa, H., Kwok, J. C. F., & Miquel, M. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2351-16.2016 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Slaker, M., Churchill, L., Todd, R. P., Blacktop, J. M., Zuloaga, D. G., Raber, J., Darling, R. A., Brown, T. E., & Sorg, B. A. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3592-14.2015 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Coleman, L. G., Liu, W., Oguz, I., Styner, M., & Crews, F. T. (2014) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.11.021 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Releasing Addiction Memories Trapped in Perineuronal Nets
Lasek, A. W., Chen, H., & Chen, W.-Y. (2018) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2017.12.004 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Slaker, M. L., Jorgensen, E. T., Hegarty, D. M., Liu, X., Kong, Y., Zhang, F., Linhardt, R. J., Brown, T. E., Aicher, S. A., & Sorg, B. A. (2018) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0221-18.2018 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory
Fawcett, J. W., Fyhn, M., Jendelova, P., Kwok, J. C. F., Ruzicka, J., & Sorg, B. A. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01634-3 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roura-Martínez, D., Díaz-Bejarano, P., Ucha, M., Paiva, R. R., Ambrosio, E., & Higuera-Matas, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Ambrosio, Emilio
- Venue
- Neuropharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 108290
- ISSN
- 0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082445752
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Espacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I Prehistoria y Arqueología (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
- Justice Programme
- Fundación BBVA
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- perineuronal nets, prefrontal cortex, cocaine withdrawal, heroin withdrawal, sucrose self-administration, drug relapse, infralimbic cortex, extracellular matrix, addiction, conditioned cues
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Cocaine, Heroin, Male, Nerve Net, Peripheral Nerves, Rats, Inbred Lew, Self Administration, Sucrose, Prefrontal Cortex, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review