Cited by 368Spatial Cognition and NavigationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation

Abstract

Following the theoretical framework of coordinate and categorical principals for visuo-spatial processing, originally formulated by [Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: AQ computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175], we present data from an fMRI study on mental rotation, using the classic [Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703] task, comparing males and females. Subjects were presented with black-and-white drawings of 3-D shapes taken from the set of 3-D perspective drawings developed by [Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703], alternated with 2-D white bars as control stimuli. The drawings were presented pairwise, as black and white drawings against a black circular background. On half of the trials, the two 3-D shapes were congruent but portrayed with different orientation, in the other half the two shapes were incongruent. Analysis of response accuracy and reaction times did not reveal any significant differences between the sexes. However, clusters of significant neuronal activation were found in the superior parietal lobule (BA 7), more intensely over the right hemisphere, and bilaterally in the inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45). Males showed predominantly parietal activation, while the females, in addition, showed inferior frontal activation. We suggest that males may be biased towards…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Aleman, 2004, A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women, Psychoneuroendocriniology, 29, 612, 10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00089-1 · DOI
  2. Alexander, 2002, Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following intentional learning of object identies, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1516, 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00215-9 · DOI
  3. Alivisatos, 1997, Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation, Neuropsychologia, 35, 111, 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00083-8 · DOI
  4. Astur, 2004, Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation, Brain Behavioral Research, 151, 103, 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.024 · DOI
  5. Baciu, 1999, Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization, Neuroreport, 10, 1373, 10.1097/00001756-199904260-00040 · DOI
  6. Belin, 1998, Role of non-occipital areas in mental rotation: A fMRI Study, NeuroImage, 7, 117, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)30950-9 · DOI
  7. Carpenter, 1999, Time course of fMRI activation in language and spatial networks during sentence comprhension, NeuroImage, 10, 216, 10.1006/nimg.1999.0465 · DOI
  8. Cohen, 1996, Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI, Brain, 119, 89, 10.1093/brain/119.1.89 · DOI
  9. Cohen, 1989, No hemispheric differences for mental rotation of letters or polygons, Bulletin of the Pychonomic Society, 27, 25, 10.3758/BF03329887 · DOI
  10. Colby, 1995, Oculocentric spatial representation in parietal cortex, Cerebral Cortex, 5, 470, 10.1093/cercor/5.5.470 · DOI
  11. Cooper, 1976, Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation, Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 296, 10.3758/BF03204234 · DOI
  12. Corballis, 1988, Imagery in a commissurotomized patient, Neuropsychologia, 26, 13, 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90027-9 · DOI
  13. Crucian, 1998, Sex differences in right hemisphere tasks, Brain and Cognition, 36, 377, 10.1006/brcg.1998.0999 · DOI
  14. Deutsch, 1988, Visuospatial tasks compared via activation of regional cerebral blood flow, Neuropsychologia, 26, 445, 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90097-8 · DOI
  15. Ditunno, 1990, Right hemisphere specilaization for mental rotation in normals and brain damaged subjects, Cortex, 26, 177, 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80349-8 · DOI
  16. Fisher, 1988, Hemisphere differences for components of mental rotation, Brain and Cognition, 7, 1, 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90017-6 · DOI
  17. Francis, 1997, Cerebral asymmetry and decision strategies in mental rotation: A psychophysical analysis, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 225, 10.1080/713752550 · DOI
  18. Harris, 2002, mental-rotation deficits following damage to the right basal ganglia, Neuropsychology, 16, 524, 10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.524 · DOI
  19. Honey, 2000, The representation of objects in the human occipital and temporal cortex, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 35, 10.1162/089892900564055 · DOI
  20. Hooven, 2004, The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation, Neuropsychologia, 42, 782, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.012 · DOI
  21. Jordan, 2003, Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks, Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00076-3 · DOI
  22. Kosslyn, 1985, A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patients, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 311, 10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.311 · DOI
  23. Kosslyn, 1987, Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: AQ computational approach, Psychological Review, 94, 148, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.148 · DOI
  24. Kosslyn, 1998, Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations, Psychobiology, 26, 333, 10.3758/BF03330620 · DOI
  25. Levy, 1978, Variations in cerebral organization as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 119, 10.1037/0096-3445.107.2.119 · DOI
  26. Michel, 1994, Duration of EEG and MEG suppression increases with angle in a mental rotaiton task, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 139, 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.139 · DOI
  27. Morton, 1995, Image transformation dissociated from visuospatial working memory, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 767, 10.1080/02643299508251401 · DOI
  28. Parsons, 2004, Sex differences in mental rotation in a virtual environment, Neuropsychologia, 42, 555, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.014 · DOI
  29. Peters, 1995, A redrawn Vandenberg & Kuse mental rotation test: Different versions and factors that affect performance, Brain & Cognition, 28, 39, 10.1006/brcg.1995.1032 · DOI
  30. Raczkowski, 1974, Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items, Neuropsychologia, 12, 43, 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90025-6 · DOI
  31. Richter, 1997, Time-resolved fMRI of mental rotation, NeuroReport, 8, 3697, 10.1097/00001756-199712010-00008 · DOI
  32. Seurinck, 2004, Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences?, Neuroimage, 23, 1440, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.010 · DOI
  33. Shepard, 1971, Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science, 171, 701, 10.1126/science.171.3972.701 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Steinmetz, 1998, Contributions of posterior parietal cortex to cognitive functions in primates, Pscychobiology, 26, 109, 10.3758/BF03330598 · DOI
  35. Tagaris, 1996, Quantitative relations between parietal activation and performance in mental rotation, NeuroReport, 7, 773, 10.1097/00001756-199602290-00022 · DOI
  36. Tagaris, 1997, Mental rotation studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging at high field (4 Tesla): Performance and cortical activation, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 419, 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.419 · DOI
  37. Tagaris, 1998, Functional magnetic resonance imaging of mental rotation and memory scanning: A multidimensional scaling analysis of brain activation patterns, Brain Research Reviews, 26, 106, 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00060-X · DOI
  38. Taira, 1998, A PET study of axis orientation discrimination, NeuroReport, 9, 283, 10.1097/00001756-199801260-00020 · DOI
  39. Thomsen, 2000, A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task, Medical Science Monitor, 6, 1186
  40. Tomasino, 2004, Effects of strategies on mental rotation and hemispheric lateralization: Neuropsychological evidence, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 878, 10.1162/089892904970753 · DOI
  41. Tranel, 2004, Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 719, 10.1080/02643290342000627 · DOI
  42. Trojano, 2002, Coordinate and categorical judgments in spatial imagery: An fMRI study, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1666, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00021-0 · DOI
  43. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Weiss, 2003, Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers, Neuroscience Letters, 344, 169, 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00406-3 · DOI
  45. Wilson, 1994, Topographical analysis of cortical evoked activity during a variable demand spatial processing task, Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 65, 54

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 337

Metadata

Authors
Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L.
Affiliations
Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
1575-1583
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978753300
Cited by
368
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 23
FWCI
48.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
sex differences, mental rotation, visuospatial processing, superior parietal lobule, inferior frontal gyrus, hemispheric lateralization, brain activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imagination, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review